Bradley Alys E, Cary Maurice G, Isobe Kaori, Naylor Stuart, Drew Stephen
57146Charles River Laboratories Edinburgh Ltd, Tranent, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Pathology Experts GmbH, Witterswil, Switzerland.
Toxicol Pathol. 2021 Jun;49(4):750-754. doi: 10.1177/0192623320983252. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
This Proof of Concept (POC) study was to assess whether assessment of whole slide images (WSI) of the 2 target tissues for a contemporaneous peer review can elicit concordant results to the findings generated by the Study Pathologist from the glass slides. Well-focused WSI of liver and spleen from 4 groups of mice, that had previously been diagnosed to be the target tissues by an experienced veterinary toxicologic pathologist examining glass slides, were independently reviewed by 3 veterinary pathologists with varying experience in assessment of WSIs. Diagnostic discrepancies were then reviewed by an experienced adjudicating pathologist. Assessment of microscopic findings using WSI showed concordance with the glass slides, with only slight discrepancy in severity grades noted. None of the lesions recorded by the Study pathologist were "missed" and no lesions were added by the pathologists evaluating WSIs, thus demonstrating equivalence of the WSI to glass slides for this study.
本概念验证(POC)研究旨在评估对两种目标组织的全切片图像(WSI)进行同期同行评审所得到的结果,是否与研究病理学家从玻璃切片得出的结果一致。对四组小鼠的肝脏和脾脏进行聚焦良好的WSI,这些组织先前已由一位经验丰富的兽医毒理病理学家通过检查玻璃切片诊断为目标组织,由三位在WSI评估方面经验各异的兽医病理学家独立进行评审。然后由一位经验丰富的裁决病理学家对诊断差异进行评审。使用WSI对微观发现的评估与玻璃切片结果一致,仅在严重程度分级上有轻微差异。研究病理学家记录的病变无一“遗漏”,评估WSI的病理学家也未添加任何病变,因此证明在本研究中WSI与玻璃切片等效。