Suppr超能文献

法国全科医生对动脉高血压的诊断和监测中的家庭血压测量:奥弗涅地区的一项横断面调查。

Home blood-pressure measurement for the diagnosis and monitoring of arterial hypertension by French general practitioners: a cross-sectional survey in the Auvergne region.

机构信息

Department of General Medicine, UFR Medicine, Clermont Auvergne University, 28, place Henri Dunant, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France.

Université Clermont Auvergne, Unité de recherche ACCePPT, Clermont-Ferrand, France.

出版信息

BMC Fam Pract. 2021 Jan 4;22(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01358-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Home blood-pressure measurement (HBPM) is recommended for the diagnosis of hypertension and monitoring of patients with hypertension. Since 2013, the French National Health Insurance Body (FNHIB) has promoted HBPM to general practitioners (GPs). The objective of the study was to evaluate the practice of HBPM by French GPs to diagnose and monitor hypertension, 3 years after the beginning of the FNHIB campaign.

METHODS

We conducted a postal survey from 7 March to 31 May 2016. All of the 1040 GPs practising in the Auvergne region in France were invited to participate, using a self-reporting questionnaire. We obtained information on the characteristics of the GPs, and their practice regarding the use of HBPM. Use of HBPM was reported as "never, occasionally, regularly and systematically". Frequency of HBMP use was analysed using multivariate ordered logistic regression model.

RESULTS

A total of 569 (54.7%) GPs responded to the survey. They were 50.3 (± 11.5) years old, 241 (43.0%) were female, and 352 (62.7%) worked in urban areas. Among them, 530 (94.5%) reported the use of HBPM for diagnosis and 519 (92.5%) for monitoring hypertension. To diagnose hypertension, younger GPs (OR = 0.97; 95% CI: 0.95-0.98), GPs practising in a group (OR = 1.45; 95% CI: 1.00-2.10) and in an MHC (OR = 2.09; 95% CI: 1.15-3.78), as compared to GPs with individual practices, and Clinical Tutors, as compared to non-Clinical Tutors, (OR = 1.92; 95% CI: 1.33-2.79) reported more frequent use of HBPM. To manage hypertension, female GPs, as compared to male GPs, (OR=1.47; 95% CI: 1.04-2.06), younger GPs (OR = 0.98; 95% CI: 0.97-0.99), and Clinical Tutors (OR = 1.90; 95% CI: 1.31-2.75) reported more frequent use of HBPM.

CONCLUSIONS

Our survey reveals that 3 years after the introduction of the FNHIB incentives, the use of HBPM by participating GPs to diagnose and manage hypertension is well established. A larger survey of GPs from other regions would make it possible to verify whether our results can be extrapolated to France as a whole.

摘要

背景

家庭血压测量(HBPM)被推荐用于高血压的诊断和高血压患者的监测。自 2013 年以来,法国国家健康保险局(FNHIB)已经向全科医生(GPs)推广 HBPM。本研究的目的是评估法国全科医生在 FNHIB 活动开始 3 年后进行 HBPM 诊断和监测高血压的情况。

方法

我们于 2016 年 3 月 7 日至 5 月 31 日进行了一项邮寄调查。邀请了在法国奥弗涅地区执业的 1040 名全科医生参加,采用自我报告的问卷。我们获得了全科医生特征和使用 HBPM 情况的信息。HBPM 的使用情况报告为“从不、偶尔、经常和系统”。使用多变量有序逻辑回归模型分析 HBPM 使用频率。

结果

共有 569 名(54.7%)全科医生对调查做出了回应。他们的年龄为 50.3(±11.5)岁,241 名(43.0%)为女性,352 名(62.7%)在城市地区工作。其中,530 名(94.5%)报告使用 HBPM 进行诊断,519 名(92.5%)用于监测高血压。在诊断高血压方面,年轻的全科医生(OR=0.97;95%CI:0.95-0.98)、在小组中执业的全科医生(OR=1.45;95%CI:1.00-2.10)和在 MHC 中执业的全科医生(OR=2.09;95%CI:1.15-3.78),与个体执业的全科医生相比,以及临床导师(OR=1.92;95%CI:1.33-2.79),报告了更频繁地使用 HBPM。在管理高血压方面,女性全科医生(OR=1.47;95%CI:1.04-2.06),年轻的全科医生(OR=0.98;95%CI:0.97-0.99)和临床导师(OR=1.90;95%CI:1.31-2.75)报告了更频繁地使用 HBPM。

结论

我们的调查显示,在 FNHIB 激励措施推出 3 年后,参与调查的全科医生使用 HBPM 进行高血压的诊断和治疗已得到广泛应用。对来自其他地区的全科医生进行更大规模的调查,将有助于验证我们的研究结果是否可以推广到法国整体。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8359/7780393/9705f910f864/12875_2020_1358_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验