McGuire Sarayna S, Klassen Aaron B, Heywood John, Sztajnkrycer Matthew D
Department of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MinnesotaUSA.
Division of Prehospital Care, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MinnesotaUSA.
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2021 Apr;36(2):131-134. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X2000151X. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
Although first responders (FRs) represent a high-risk group for exposure, little information is available regarding their risk of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. The purpose of the current study was to determine the serological prevalence of past COVID-19 infection in a cohort of municipal law enforcement (LE) and firefighters (FFs).
Descriptive analysis of a de-identified data reporting Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) immunoglobulin G (IgG), or COR2G, serology results for municipal FRs. As part of the serology process, FRs were surveyed for COVID-19-like symptoms since February 2020 and asked to report any prior COVID-19 nasal swab testing. Descriptive statistics and two-sided Chi Square tests with Yates correction were used to compare groups.
Of 318 FRs, 225 (80.2%) underwent serology testing (LE: 163/207 [78.7%]; FF: 92/111 [82.9%]). The prevalence of positive serology for all FRs tested was 3/255 (1.2%). Two LE (1.2%) and one FF (1.1%) had positive serology (P = 1.0). Two hundred and twenty-four FRs responded to a survey regarding prior symptoms and testing. Fifty-eight (25.9%) FRs (44 LE; 14 FFs) reported the presence of COVID-19-like symptoms. Of these, only nine (15.5%) received reverse transcriptase - polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing; none were positive. Two of the three FRs with positive serology reported no COVID-19-like symptoms and none of these responders had received prior nasal RT-PCR swabs. The overall community positive RT-PCR rate was 0.36%, representing a three-fold higher rate of positive seroprevalence amongst FRs compared with the general population (P = .07).
Amongst a cohort of municipal FRs with low community COVID-19 prevalence, the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-19 IgG Ab was three-fold greater than the general community. Two-thirds of positive FRs reported a lack of symptoms. Only 15.5% of FRs with COVID-19-like symptoms received RT-PCR testing. In addition to workplace control measures, increased testing availability to FRs is critical in limiting infection spread and ensuring response capability.
尽管急救人员是高暴露风险群体,但关于他们感染2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的风险信息却很少。本研究的目的是确定一组市政执法人员(LE)和消防员(FF)中既往COVID-19感染的血清学流行率。
对一份去识别化数据进行描述性分析,该数据报告了市政急救人员的严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)免疫球蛋白G(IgG),即COR2G的血清学结果。作为血清学检测过程的一部分,自2020年2月以来对急救人员进行了COVID-19样症状调查,并要求他们报告之前的任何COVID-19鼻拭子检测情况。使用描述性统计和带有耶茨校正的双侧卡方检验来比较各组。
在318名急救人员中,225人(80.2%)接受了血清学检测(执法人员:163/207 [78.7%];消防员:92/111 [82.9%])。所有接受检测的急救人员中血清学阳性率为3/255(1.2%)。两名执法人员(1.2%)和一名消防员(1.1%)血清学呈阳性(P = 1.0)。224名急救人员回复了关于既往症状和检测的调查。58名(25.9%)急救人员(44名执法人员;14名消防员)报告有COVID-19样症状。其中,只有9人(15.5%)接受了逆转录 - 聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)检测;均为阴性。三名血清学阳性的急救人员中有两人报告没有COVID-19样症状,且这些回复者中没有人之前接受过鼻拭子RT-PCR检测。总体社区RT-PCR阳性率为0.36%,这表明急救人员的血清学阳性率是普通人群的三倍(P = 0.07)。
在社区COVID-19患病率较低的一组市政急救人员中,SARS-CoV-19 IgG抗体的血清学阳性率比普通社区高三倍。三分之二血清学阳性的急救人员报告没有症状。只有15.5%有COVID-19样症状的急救人员接受了RT-PCR检测。除了工作场所控制措施外,增加急救人员的检测机会对于限制感染传播和确保应对能力至关重要。