Kamarajah Sivesh K, Naffouje Samer A, Salti George I, Dahdaleh Fadi S
Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, The Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK.
Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Newcastle, UK.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Apr;28(4):1896-1905. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-09470-x. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
Despite neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) being increasingly utilized and possibly associated with improved oncological outcomes, the impact of NAC on textbook outcomes following pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains debated.
A retrospective review of the National Cancer Database of patients undergoing resection of non-metastatic PDAC from 2004 to 2016 was performed. Propensity score matching was used to account for treatment selection bias in patients with and without NAC (noNAC). A multivariable binary logistic regression model was used to analyze the association of NAC with length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmission, and 30- and 90-day mortality.
Of 7975 (11%) NAC patients and 65,338 (89%) noNAC patients, 2911 NAC and 2911 noNAC patients remained in the cohort after matching. Clinicopathologic and demographic variables were well-balanced after matching. After matching, NAC was associated with significantly lower rates of 30-day readmission (5.5% vs. 7.4%; p = 0.006), which remained after multivariable adjustment (odds ratio [OR] 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60-0.92; p = 0.006). There were no significant differences in LOS and 30- and 90-day mortality in patients receiving NAC and noNAC. Stratified analyses by surgery type (i.e. pancreaticoduodenectomy [PD] and distal pancreatectomy [DP]) demonstrated consistent results.
Receipt of NAC in PDAC patients undergoing DP or PD is associated with lower readmission rates and does not otherwise compromise short-term outcomes. These data reaffirm the safety of strategies incorporating NAC and is important to consider when devising policies aimed at quality improvement in achieving textbook outcomes.
尽管新辅助化疗(NAC)的应用越来越广泛,并且可能与改善肿瘤学结局相关,但NAC对胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)胰腺切除术后教科书式结局的影响仍存在争议。
对2004年至2016年接受非转移性PDAC切除术的患者的国家癌症数据库进行回顾性分析。采用倾向评分匹配法来消除接受和未接受NAC(未接受NAC)患者的治疗选择偏倚。使用多变量二元逻辑回归模型分析NAC与住院时间(LOS)、30天再入院率以及30天和90天死亡率之间的关联。
在7975例(11%)接受NAC的患者和65338例(89%)未接受NAC的患者中,匹配后队列中分别有2911例接受NAC的患者和2911例未接受NAC的患者。匹配后临床病理和人口统计学变量得到了很好的平衡。匹配后,NAC与显著更低的30天再入院率相关(5.5%对7.4%;p = 0.006),多变量调整后该结果仍然存在(优势比[OR] 0.74,95%置信区间[CI] 0.60 - 0.92;p = 0.006)。接受NAC和未接受NAC的患者在LOS以及30天和90天死亡率方面没有显著差异。按手术类型(即胰十二指肠切除术[PD]和胰体尾切除术[DP])进行的分层分析显示了一致的结果。
接受DP或PD的PDAC患者接受NAC与较低的再入院率相关,且不会对短期结局造成其他不良影响。这些数据再次证实了纳入NAC策略的安全性,并且在制定旨在提高质量以实现教科书式结局并改善预后的政策时,考虑这一点很重要。