Mazzillo Vega Liliana, Cabrera Bravo Nancy
Hospital Infantil Los Ángeles, Nariño, Colombia.
Rev Chil Pediatr. 2020 Aug;91(4):553-560. doi: 10.32641/rchped.vi91i4.1458. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
Severe infections are the leading cause of admission to pediatric intensive care. The FilmArray BCID panel quickly identifies microorganisms that cause bacteremia.
To evaluate if the rapid identification of the microorganisms that cause bacteremia, along with a Rational Use of Antibio tics (RUA) Program, allows optimizing the time of antibiotic therapy in a pediatric hospital. Pa tients and Method: Retrospective study which included 100 patients presenting their first episode of bacteremia, divided into 2 groups of 50 each. The first one was Intervention (FilmArray BCID and RUA program) and the second one was Historical Controls (conventional automated ID/AST). The variables evaluated were the time required for microbial identification, duration of appropriate therapy, and antibiotic de-escalation.
The groups were comparable in terms of demographic characteristics, focus of infection, and etiology of bacteremia. The average time of microorganisms' identification of the control group was 70.5 hours (IC 95% 65.2-78.6) and 23.0 hours (IC 95% 12.4 -26.7) in the intervention one (p < 0.05). The average time of targeted therapy onset was shorter in the intervention group (27.9 h [IC 95% 22.3-32.8]) than that of the control one (71.9 h [IC 95% 63.2-77.8]) (p < 0.05). Finally, the time to de-escalate or discontinue antibiotics in the intervention group and the control one was 6.4 hours (IC 95% 2.76-9.49) hours and 22.0 hours (IC 95% 6.74-35.6 h) respectively (p > 0.05).
The FilmArray panel along with the RUA Program allows the identification of the microorganisms causing bacteremia faster than conventional methods, which positions it as a tool that optimizes antibiotic therapy of critical patients.
严重感染是儿童重症监护病房收治患者的主要原因。FilmArray BCID检测板可快速鉴定引起菌血症的微生物。
评估快速鉴定引起菌血症的微生物以及合理使用抗生素(RUA)计划是否能优化儿科医院的抗生素治疗时间。患者与方法:回顾性研究,纳入100例首次发生菌血症的患者,分为两组,每组50例。第一组为干预组(FilmArray BCID和RUA计划),第二组为历史对照组(传统自动鉴定/药敏试验)。评估的变量包括微生物鉴定所需时间、适当治疗的持续时间以及抗生素降阶梯使用情况。
两组在人口统计学特征、感染部位和菌血症病因方面具有可比性。对照组微生物鉴定的平均时间为70.5小时(95%置信区间65.2 - 78.6),干预组为23.0小时(95%置信区间12.4 - 26.7)(p < 0.05)。干预组靶向治疗开始的平均时间(27.9小时[95%置信区间22.3 - 32.8])短于对照组(71.9小时[95%置信区间63.2 - 77.8])(p < 0.05)。最后,干预组和对照组抗生素降阶梯或停用的时间分别为6.4小时(95%置信区间2.76 - 9.49)和22.0小时(95%置信区间6.74 - 35.6小时)(p > 0.05)。
FilmArray检测板与RUA计划相比传统方法能更快地鉴定引起菌血症的微生物,这使其成为优化重症患者抗生素治疗的一种工具。