• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

流动人口身份与超高危精神病患者群体转变之间的关联。

The association between migrant status and transition in an ultra-high risk for psychosis population.

机构信息

Orygen, Melbourne, Australia.

Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2021 Jun;56(6):943-952. doi: 10.1007/s00127-020-02012-6. Epub 2021 Jan 5.

DOI:10.1007/s00127-020-02012-6
PMID:33399885
Abstract

PURPOSE

Migrant status is one of the most replicated and robust risk factors for developing a psychotic disorder. This study aimed to determine whether migrant status in people identified as Ultra-High Risk for Psychosis (UHR) was associated with risk of transitioning to a full-threshold psychotic disorder.

METHODS

Hazard ratios for the risk of transition were calculated from five large UHR cohorts (n = 2166) and were used to conduct a meta-analysis using the generic inverse-variance method using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

2166 UHR young people, with a mean age of 19.1 years (SD ± 4.5) were included, of whom 221 (10.7%) were first-generation migrants. A total of 357 young people transitioned to psychosis over a median follow-up time of 417 days (I.Q.R.147-756 days), representing 17.0% of the cohort. The risk of transition to a full-threshold disorder was not increased for first-generation migrants, (HR = 1.08, 95% CI 0.62-1.89); however, there was a high level of heterogeneity between studies The hazard ratio for second-generation migrants to transition to a full-threshold psychotic disorder compared to the remainder of the native-born population was 1.03 (95% CI 0.70-1.51).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis did not find a statistically significant association between migrant status and an increased risk for transition to a full-threshold psychotic disorder; however, several methodological issues could explain this finding. Further research should focus on examining the risk of specific migrant groups and also ensuring that migrant populations are adequately represented within UHR clinics.

摘要

目的

移民身份是发展精神病障碍的最具复制性和最强大的风险因素之一。本研究旨在确定在被确定为精神病超高风险(UHR)的人群中,移民身份是否与发展为全面精神病障碍的风险相关。

方法

使用五个大型 UHR 队列(n=2166)计算风险转移的风险比,并使用通用倒数方差法和随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。

结果

共纳入 2166 名 UHR 年轻人,平均年龄为 19.1 岁(SD±4.5),其中 221 人(10.7%)为第一代移民。在中位数随访时间为 417 天(IQR147-756 天)的情况下,共有 357 名年轻人发展为精神病,占队列的 17.0%。第一代移民向全面精神病障碍的转变风险没有增加(HR=1.08,95%CI0.62-1.89);然而,研究之间存在高度异质性。与本地出生人口相比,第二代移民向全面精神病障碍转变的风险比为 1.03(95%CI0.70-1.51)。

结论

本荟萃分析未发现移民身份与全面精神病障碍转变风险增加之间存在统计学显著关联;然而,一些方法学问题可能解释了这一发现。进一步的研究应侧重于检查特定移民群体的风险,并确保 UHR 诊所充分代表移民人口。

相似文献

1
The association between migrant status and transition in an ultra-high risk for psychosis population.流动人口身份与超高危精神病患者群体转变之间的关联。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2021 Jun;56(6):943-952. doi: 10.1007/s00127-020-02012-6. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
2
Migrant status and identification as ultra-high risk for psychosis and transitioning to a psychotic disorder.移民身份和被认定为精神病超高危状态,以及向精神病障碍的转变。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2020 Jan;141(1):52-59. doi: 10.1111/acps.13099. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
3
The associations between migrant status and ethnicity and the identification of individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis and transition to psychosis: a systematic review.移民身份和族裔与超高风险个体识别和精神病转化之间的关联:系统评价。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2021 Nov;56(11):1923-1941. doi: 10.1007/s00127-021-02047-3. Epub 2021 Feb 28.
4
Social environmental risk factors for transition to psychosis in an Ultra-High Risk population.超高风险人群中向精神病转变的社会环境风险因素。
Schizophr Res. 2015 Feb;161(2-3):150-5. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2014.10.050. Epub 2014 Nov 28.
5
Young migrants to Australia identified as being at ultra-high risk for psychosis: Pathways to care and clinical characteristics.年轻移民到澳大利亚被认为患有精神病的超高风险:护理途径和临床特征。
Schizophr Res. 2022 Mar;241:156-160. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2022.01.036. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
6
Association of neighbourhood migrant density and risk of non-affective psychosis: a national, longitudinal cohort study.邻里移民密度与非情感性精神病风险的关联:一项全国性纵向队列研究。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Apr;7(4):327-336. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30059-6. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
7
The association between social deprivation and the rate of identification of individuals at Ultra-High Risk for psychosis and transition to psychosis.社会剥夺与超高危个体识别率及向精神病转化之间的关联。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2023 Mar;69(2):294-303. doi: 10.1177/00207640221087608. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
8
Risk of psychotic disorders in migrants to Australia.移民澳大利亚人群患精神病障碍的风险。
Psychol Med. 2021 May;51(7):1192-1200. doi: 10.1017/S0033291719004100. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
9
Mapping the onset of psychosis: the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States.绘制精神病发作轨迹:高危精神状态综合评估
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2005 Nov-Dec;39(11-12):964-71. doi: 10.1080/j.1440-1614.2005.01714.x.
10
Impaired mismatch negativity to frequency deviants in individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis, and preliminary evidence for further impairment with transition to psychosis.超精神病高危个体对频率偏差的失匹配负波受损,且向精神病转化时进一步受损的初步证据。
Schizophr Res. 2018 Jan;191:95-100. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2017.11.005. Epub 2017 Nov 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Review of factors resulting in systemic biases in the screening, assessment, and treatment of individuals at clinical high-risk for psychosis in the United States.美国临床高危精神病个体筛查、评估和治疗中导致系统性偏差的因素综述。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Mar 13;14:1117022. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1117022. eCollection 2023.
2
Migrant status, clinical symptoms and functional outcome in youth at clinical high risk for psychosis: findings from the NAPLS-3 study.处于临床精神病高风险的青少年的移民身份、临床症状和功能结局:来自NAPLS-3研究的结果
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2023 Apr;58(4):559-568. doi: 10.1007/s00127-022-02383-y. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Risk of psychotic disorders in migrants to Australia.移民澳大利亚人群患精神病障碍的风险。
Psychol Med. 2021 May;51(7):1192-1200. doi: 10.1017/S0033291719004100. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
2
Age at migration and the risk of psychotic disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.移民年龄与精神障碍风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2020 May;141(5):410-420. doi: 10.1111/acps.13147. Epub 2020 Jan 20.
3
Migrant status and identification as ultra-high risk for psychosis and transitioning to a psychotic disorder.移民身份和被认定为精神病超高危状态,以及向精神病障碍的转变。
Equity in Mental Health Services for Youth at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis: Considering Marginalized Identities and Stressors.
为处于精神病临床高危状态的青少年提供心理健康服务的公平性:考虑边缘化身份和压力源
Evid Based Pract Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2022;7(2):176-197. doi: 10.1080/23794925.2022.2042874. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
4
Comparing Risk Factors for Non-affective Psychotic Disorders With Common Mental Disorders Among Migrant Groups: A 25-Year Retrospective Cohort Study of 2 Million Migrants.比较移民群体中非情感性精神病障碍与常见精神障碍的风险因素:一项对 200 万移民进行的 25 年回顾性队列研究。
Schizophr Bull. 2022 Sep 1;48(5):1011-1020. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbac021.
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2020 Jan;141(1):52-59. doi: 10.1111/acps.13099. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
4
Predictors of Transition to Psychosis in Individuals at Clinical High Risk.临床高风险个体向精神病转化的预测因素。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2019 Apr 29;21(6):39. doi: 10.1007/s11920-019-1027-y.
5
Migration and psychosis: a meta-analysis of incidence studies.迁移与精神病:发病率研究的荟萃分析。
Psychol Med. 2020 Jan;50(2):303-313. doi: 10.1017/S0033291719000035. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
6
Psychoses sans Frontieres: towards an interdisciplinary understanding of psychosis risk amongst migrants and their descendants.跨边界精神病学:对移民及其后代精神疾病风险的跨学科理解。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2019 Apr;28(2):146-152. doi: 10.1017/S2045796018000501. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
7
Risk of psychosis in refugees: a literature review.难民患精神病的风险:文献综述
Transl Psychiatry. 2017 Jun 13;7(6):e1149. doi: 10.1038/tp.2017.119.
8
Effect of ω-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids in Young People at Ultrahigh Risk for Psychotic Disorders: The NEURAPRO Randomized Clinical Trial.ω-3 多不饱和脂肪酸对超高精神病风险青年的影响:NEURAPRO 随机临床试验。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Jan 1;74(1):19-27. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.2902.
9
Four-Year Follow-up of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Persons at Ultra-High Risk for Developing Psychosis: The Dutch Early Detection Intervention Evaluation (EDIE-NL) Trial.对超高精神病发病风险人群进行认知行为疗法的四年随访:荷兰早期检测干预评估(EDIE-NL)试验
Schizophr Bull. 2016 Sep;42(5):1243-52. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbw018. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
10
North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study (NAPLS 2): The Prodromal Symptoms.北美前驱期纵向研究(NAPLS 2):前驱症状
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2015 May;203(5):328-35. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000290.