Suppr超能文献

胸腔手术后术后心房颤动(POAF)管理的变化。

Variation in management of post-operative atrial fibrillation (POAF) after thoracic surgery.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.

Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, 725 Parkdale Ave, Ottawa, ON, K1Y4E9, Canada.

出版信息

Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Aug;69(8):1230-1235. doi: 10.1007/s11748-020-01574-1. Epub 2021 Jan 5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

New-onset post-operative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is a frequent adverse event following major thoracic surgery and is associated with increased risk of perioperative morbidity, length of stay and stroke. It is managed initially with rate and rhythm control therapy; however, optimal duration and the need for anticoagulation are poorly understood. This study aims to assess practice variation regarding POAF management and duration.

METHODS

This retrospective, single-center cohort study included patients who underwent major thoracic surgery and developed POAF between 2008 and 2017, managed with rate and rhythm control therapy alone. Demographic, clinical, and surgical variables/outcomes, POAF management, and incidence of POAF recurrence in the 30-day post-operative period were collected. Chi-square and T-tests determined significance.

RESULTS

Of 2054 patients undergoing thoracic surgery, 155 (75%) patients developed POAF. Different rate and rhythm control agents were used, most commonly metoprolol. 107 (69%) continued rate and rhythm control therapy upon hospital discharge for a mean of 56 days. Among the 48 patients with discontinuation of rate and rhythm control therapy on discharge, none demonstrated recurrence of POAF; in contrast to 3 of 107 patients who continued on therapy. Among patients with CHADS-VASc score ≥ 2, 15% were prescribed anticoagulation on discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of rate and rhythm control therapy and anticoagulation for POAF is significantly varied in practice. Many patients are not continued on rate and rhythm control after hospital discharge, which does not appear to impact risk of POAF recurrence. Further research to inform guidelines for POAF management, including therapy duration and indications for anticoagulation is warranted.

摘要

目的

新发术后心房颤动(POAF)是心胸大手术后常见的不良事件,与围手术期发病率、住院时间和中风风险增加相关。其初始治疗为控制心率和节律,然而,目前对于最佳持续时间和抗凝需求仍知之甚少。本研究旨在评估 POAF 管理和持续时间的实践差异。

方法

本回顾性、单中心队列研究纳入了 2008 年至 2017 年间接受心胸大手术且术后发生 POAF 的患者,单独采用控制心率和节律的治疗方法。收集人口统计学、临床和手术变量/结果、POAF 管理以及术后 30 天内 POAF 复发的发生率。使用卡方检验和 T 检验确定差异的显著性。

结果

在 2054 例行心胸手术的患者中,155 例(75%)发生 POAF。使用了不同的控制心率和节律的药物,最常用的是美托洛尔。107 例(69%)患者在出院时继续接受控制心率和节律的治疗,平均持续 56 天。在 48 例出院时停止控制心率和节律治疗的患者中,无一例 POAF 复发;而在继续治疗的 107 例患者中,有 3 例复发。在 CHADS-VASc 评分≥2 的患者中,15%在出院时被开具抗凝药物。

结论

POAF 的控制心率和节律治疗及抗凝的使用在实践中存在显著差异。许多患者在出院后未继续接受控制心率和节律的治疗,但这似乎并不影响 POAF 复发的风险。需要进一步研究以制定 POAF 管理的指南,包括治疗持续时间和抗凝的适应证。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验