• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根治性膀胱切除术加回肠导管尿流改道术的结果和并发症:开放式、半机器人和全机器人手术的比较。

Outcomes and complications of radical cystectomy with ileal conduit urinary diversion: A comparison between open, semi-robotic and totally robotic surgery.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Int J Med Robot. 2021 Jun;17(3):e2221. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2221. Epub 2021 Jan 25.

DOI:10.1002/rcs.2221
PMID:33400828
Abstract

BACKGROUND

It was aimed to compare open versus robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal ileal conduit (ICIC), versus RARC with extracorporeal ileal conduit (ECIC) formation for bladder cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Open, RARC-ECIC and RARC-ICIC groups were compared in terms of patient demographics, operative and postoperative parameters, pathological parameters, complications and functional outcomes.

RESULTS

Mean operative times were lower in the RARC-ECIC group (p = 0.004). Mean estimated blood loss was significantly lower (p < 0.01) in the robotic groups. The blood transfusion was lower in RARC-ICIC groups (p < 0.001). Rates of stage pT3-4 disease were the highest in the RARC-ICIC group (p = 0.004). LOS was significantly shorter in the RARC-ICIC group (p = 0.01). Numbers of Clavien 3-5 complications were lower in the robotic groups (p = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

RARC and ICIC is a complex procedure involving an increased operation time but with the advantages of lower estimated blood loss, transfusion rates, complications and hospital stays compared with open surgery.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在比较膀胱癌患者行开放式根治性膀胱切除术(ORC)+经体腔回肠导管(ICIC)、机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术(RARC)+经体腔回肠导管(ICIC)与 RARC+经腔外回肠导管(ECIC)的效果。

材料和方法

比较 ORC、RARC-ECIC 和 RARC-ICIC 组患者的人口统计学、手术和术后参数、病理参数、并发症和功能结果。

结果

RARC-ECIC 组的平均手术时间较短(p=0.004)。机器人组的平均估计失血量显著较低(p<0.01)。RARC-ICIC 组的输血率较低(p<0.001)。RARC-ICIC 组的 pT3-4 期疾病比例最高(p=0.004)。RARC-ICIC 组的 LOS 显著缩短(p=0.01)。机器人组的 Clavien 3-5 级并发症发生率较低(p=0.012)。

结论

RARC 和 ICIC 是一种复杂的手术,操作时间较长,但与开放式手术相比,具有较低的估计失血量、输血率、并发症和住院时间的优势。

相似文献

1
Outcomes and complications of radical cystectomy with ileal conduit urinary diversion: A comparison between open, semi-robotic and totally robotic surgery.根治性膀胱切除术加回肠导管尿流改道术的结果和并发症:开放式、半机器人和全机器人手术的比较。
Int J Med Robot. 2021 Jun;17(3):e2221. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2221. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
2
Surgical outcomes and learning curve of totally intracorporeal ileal conduit urinary diversion following laparoscopic radical cystectomy at a single institution.单中心腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术后全内脏层回肠导管尿流改道术的手术结果和学习曲线。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2020 Oct;13(4):532-538. doi: 10.1111/ases.12793. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
3
Robotic versus open cystectomy with ileal conduit for the management of neurogenic bladder: a comparative study.机器人辅助与开放性膀胱切除术加回肠膀胱术治疗神经源性膀胱的比较研究
World J Urol. 2022 Dec;40(12):2963-2970. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04190-1. Epub 2022 Oct 25.
4
Systematic review and cumulative analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical cystectomy.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术围手术期结局和并发症的系统评价和累积分析。
Eur Urol. 2015 Mar;67(3):376-401. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.007. Epub 2015 Jan 2.
5
A propensity score matching study on robot-assisted radical cystectomy for older patients: comparison of intracorporeal ileal conduit and cutaneous ureterostomy.一项关于机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术治疗老年患者的倾向评分匹配研究:比较腔内回肠导管和皮肤造口术。
BMC Urol. 2022 Nov 7;22(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12894-022-01123-3.
6
A Retrospective Study Comparing Surgical and Early Oncological Outcomes between Intracorporeal and Extracorporeal Ileal Conduit after Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy from a Single Center.单中心腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术后回肠内外通道的回顾性比较手术和早期肿瘤学结果的研究。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2018 Apr 5;131(7):784-789. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.228236.
7
Surgical proficiency in laparoscopic radical cystectomy with extracorporeal urinary diversion and its adequacy for the execution of robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion.腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术联合体外尿流改道术的手术熟练程度及其在机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术联合体内尿流改道术中的应用。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2024 Apr;17(2):e13289. doi: 10.1111/ases.13289.
8
Robotic Assisted Radical Cystectomy with Extracorporeal Urinary Diversion Does Not Show a Benefit over Open Radical Cystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术联合体外尿流改道术相较于开放性根治性膀胱切除术并无优势:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 7;11(11):e0166221. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166221. eCollection 2016.
9
Robot-assisted radical cystectomy and urinary diversion: technical recommendations from the Pasadena Consensus Panel.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术和尿流改道术:帕萨迪纳共识小组的技术建议。
Eur Urol. 2015 Mar;67(3):423-31. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.027. Epub 2015 Jan 14.
10
Safe transition from extracorporeal to intracorporeal urinary diversion following robot-assisted cystectomy: a recipe for reducing operative time, blood loss and complication rates.机器人辅助膀胱切除术后从体外到体内尿流改道的安全过渡:降低手术时间、出血量和并发症发生率的秘诀。
World J Urol. 2019 Feb;37(2):367-372. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2386-4. Epub 2018 Jun 22.