Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Linkou Medical Center and Chang-Gung University, School of Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Gold Coast University Hospital, Queensland, Australia.
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2021 Jul;37(6):503-513. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1722183. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
Robotic-assisted techniques are a tremendous revolution in modern surgery, and the advantages and indications were well discussed in different specialties. However, the use of robotic technique in plastic and reconstructive surgery is still very limited, especially in the field of peripheral nerve reconstruction. This study aims to identify current clinical applications for peripheral nerve reconstruction, and to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages to establish potential uses in the future.
A review was conducted in the literatures from PubMed focusing on currently published robotic peripheral nerve intervention techniques. Eligible studies included related animal model, cadaveric and human studies. Reviews on robotic microsurgical technique unrelated to peripheral nerve intervention and non-English articles were excluded. The differences of wound assessment and nerve management between robotic-assisted and conventional approach were compared.
Total 19 studies including preclinical experimental researches and clinical reports were listed and classified into brachial plexus reconstruction, peripheral nerve tumors management, peripheral nerve decompression or repair, peripheral nerve harvesting, and sympathetic trunk reconstruction. There were three animal studies, four cadaveric studies, eight clinical series, and four studies demonstrating clinical, animal, or cadaveric studies simultaneously. In total 53 clinical cases, only 20 (37.7%) cases were successfully approached with minimal invasive and intervened robotically; 17 (32.1%) cases underwent conventional approach and the nerves were intervened robotically; 12 (22.6%) cases converted to open approach but still intervened the nerve by robot; and 4 (7.5%) cases failed to approach robotically and converted to open surgery entirely.
Robotic-assisted surgery is still in the early stage in peripheral nerve surgery. We believe the use of the robotic system in this field will develop to become popular in the future, especially in the fields that need cooperation with other specialties to provide the solutions for challenging circumstances.
机器人辅助技术是现代外科的巨大革命,不同专业已经充分讨论了其优势和适应证。然而,机器人技术在整形和重建外科中的应用仍然非常有限,特别是在外周神经重建领域。本研究旨在确定目前在外周神经重建中的临床应用,并评估其优缺点,以确定未来的潜在用途。
我们在 PubMed 文献中进行了综述,重点关注目前已发表的机器人外周神经介入技术。合格的研究包括相关的动物模型、尸体和人体研究。综述机器人显微外科技术与外周神经介入无关的和非英语文章被排除在外。比较了机器人辅助和常规方法在伤口评估和神经管理方面的差异。
共列出并分类了 19 项研究,包括临床前实验研究和临床报告,分为臂丛神经重建、周围神经肿瘤的管理、周围神经减压或修复、周围神经采集和交感干重建。有 3 项动物研究、4 项尸体研究、8 项临床系列研究和 4 项同时展示临床、动物或尸体研究的研究。在总共 53 例临床病例中,只有 20 例(37.7%)成功地采用微创和机器人辅助方法进行了治疗;17 例(32.1%)采用常规方法和机器人干预神经;12 例(22.6%)转为开放手术,但仍通过机器人干预神经;4 例(7.5%)未能进行机器人辅助治疗,完全转为开放手术。
机器人辅助手术在外周神经外科中仍处于早期阶段。我们相信,在未来,机器人系统在该领域的应用将得到发展和普及,特别是在需要与其他专业合作以提供复杂情况下解决方案的领域。