Hafiz MhdAmmar, Hawari Alaa H, Alfahel Radwan, Hassan Mohammad K, Altaee Ali
Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar.
Center for Advanced Materials, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar.
Membranes (Basel). 2021 Jan 2;11(1):32. doi: 10.3390/membranes11010032.
This study compares the performance of nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO) for the reclamation of ultrafiltered municipal wastewater for irrigation of food crops. RO and NF technologies were evaluated at different applied pressures; the performance of each technology was evaluated in terms of water flux, recovery rate, specific energy consumption and quality of permeate. It was found that the permeate from the reverse osmosis (RO) process complied with Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) standards at pressures applied between 10 and 18 bar. At an applied pressure of 20 bar, the permeate quality did not comply with irrigation water standards in terms of chloride, sodium and calcium concentration. It was found that nanofiltration process was not suitable for the reclamation of wastewater as the concentration of chloride, sodium and calcium exceeded the allowable limits at all applied pressures. In the reverse osmosis process, the highest recovery rate was 36%, which was achieved at a pressure of 16 bar. The specific energy consumption at this applied pressure was 0.56 kWh/m. The lowest specific energy of 0.46 kWh/m was achieved at an applied pressure of 12 bar with a water recovery rate of 32.7%.
本研究比较了纳滤(NF)和反渗透(RO)用于回收超滤后的城市废水以灌溉粮食作物的性能。在不同的施加压力下对RO和NF技术进行了评估;根据水通量、回收率、比能耗和渗透液质量对每种技术的性能进行了评估。结果发现,在10至18巴的施加压力下,反渗透(RO)过程的渗透液符合联合国粮食及农业组织(FAO)标准。在20巴的施加压力下,就氯化物、钠和钙的浓度而言,渗透液质量不符合灌溉水标准。结果发现,纳滤过程不适用于废水回收,因为在所有施加压力下,氯化物、钠和钙的浓度均超过了允许限值。在反渗透过程中,最高回收率为36%,这是在16巴的压力下实现的。该施加压力下的比能耗为0.56千瓦时/立方米。在12巴的施加压力和32.7%的水回收率下,实现了最低比能耗0.46千瓦时/立方米。