Şımşek Neslihan, Keleş Ali, Ahmetoğlu Fuat, Akinci Levent, Er Kürşat
Department of Endodontics, İnönü University School of Dentistry, Malatya, Turkey.
Department of Endodontics, Ondokuz Mayıs University School of Dentistry, Samsun, Turkey.
Eur Endod J. 2017 Sep 6;2(1):1-5. doi: 10.14744/eej.2017.17004. eCollection 2017.
This study used microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) to compare the volumes of voids and gaps in curved root canals instrumented and filled using various techniques.
Twenty extracted mandibular first molars with two curved mesial root canals were used. Root canals were instrumented using a self-adjusting file (SAF) or Revo-S file system. For standardization, mesiobuccal canals were instrumented with SAF and mesiolingual canals were instrumented with Revo-S in each root. The canals were divided into four experimental groups (n=10 in each). The canals were then filled via cold lateral compaction (CLC) or a thermoplasticized injectable technique (TT) using gutta-percha and AH Plus root canal sealer. The roots were scanned with a micro-CT, and the volumes of the voids and gaps were calculated using three-dimensional (3D) micro-CT images. Data were analyzed using unpaired t- and Kruskal-Wallis tests. A value of P<0.05 was considered significant.
None of the tested techniques provided void- or gap-free fillings. Nevertheless, the SAF showed more gap formation than the Revo-S, and TT showed higher gap formation in all experimental groups. These differences, however, were not statistically significant (P>0.05).
The SAF and Revo-S rotary file systems yielded comparable results. No statistically significant difference was found between the results of the various instrumentation and filling techniques.
本研究使用微型计算机断层扫描(micro-CT)比较采用各种技术进行预备和充填的弯曲根管中的空隙和间隙体积。
使用20颗拔除的下颌第一磨牙,其具有两条弯曲的近中根管。根管采用自调式锉(SAF)或Revo-S锉系统进行预备。为了标准化,每颗牙根的近中颊侧根管采用SAF预备,近中舌侧根管采用Revo-S预备。根管被分为四个实验组(每组n = 10)。然后使用牙胶尖和AH Plus根管封闭剂通过冷侧向加压充填(CLC)或热塑注射技术(TT)对根管进行充填。使用微型计算机断层扫描对牙根进行扫描,并使用三维(3D)微型计算机断层扫描图像计算空隙和间隙的体积。数据采用非配对t检验和Kruskal-Wallis检验进行分析。P<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
所测试的技术均未提供无空隙或无间隙的充填。然而,SAF比Revo-S显示出更多的间隙形成,并且TT在所有实验组中均显示出更高的间隙形成。然而,这些差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。
SAF和Revo-S旋转锉系统产生了可比的结果。各种预备和充填技术的结果之间未发现统计学上的显著差异。