• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

南非威特沃特斯兰德大学唐纳德·戈登医学中心结肠镜检查的“内幕”:门诊内镜科室的实践审核。

The 'ins and outs' of colonoscopy at Wits Donald Gordon Medical Centre, South Africa: A practice audit of the outpatient endoscopy unit.

机构信息

Wits Donald Gordon Medical Centre, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.

出版信息

S Afr Med J. 2020 Nov 27;110(12):1186-1190. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2020.v110i12.14419.

DOI:10.7196/SAMJ.2020.v110i12.14419
PMID:33403963
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In South Africa, there are no national guidelines for the conduct or quality assessment of colonoscopy, the gold standard for investigation and diagnosis of bowel pathology.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the clinical profile of patients and evaluate the practice of colonoscopy using procedural quality indicators at the Wits Donald Gordon Medical Centre (WDGMC) outpatient endoscopy unit (OEU).

METHODS

We conducted a prospective, clinical practice audit of colonoscopies performed on adults (≥18 years of age). A total of 1 643 patients were included in the study and variables that were collected enabled the assessment of adequacy of bowel preparation, length of withdrawal time and calculation of caecal intubation rate (CIR), polyp detection rate (PDR) and adenoma detection rate (ADR). We stratified PDR and ADR by sex, age, population group, withdrawal time and bowel preparation. CIR, PDR and ADR estimates were compared between patient groups by the χ2 test; Fisher's exact test was used for 2 × 2 tables. A p-value <0.05 was used. Benchmark recommendations by the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE)/American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) Task Force on Colorectal Cancer (CRC) were used in this audit to assess individual endoscopist performance and that of the endoscopy unit as a whole.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients was 55.7 (standard deviation (SD) 14.4; range 18 - 91) years, ~60% were female, and the majority (75.5%) were white. Of the outpatients, 77.6% had adequate bowel preparation (ASGE/ACG benchmark ≥85%). The CIR was 97.0% overall, and screening colonoscopy was 96.3% (ASGE/ACG benchmark ≥90% overall and ≥95% for screening colonoscopies). The median withdrawal time for negative-result screening colonoscopies was 5.7 minutes (interquartile range (IQR) 4.2 - 9.3; range 1.1 - 20.6) (ASGE/ACG benchmark ≥ 6minutes), and PDR and ADR were 27.6% and 15.6%, respectively (ASGE/ACG benchmark ADR ≥25%). We demonstrated a 23.7% increase in PDR and 14.1% increase in ADR between scopes that had mean withdrawal times of ≥6 minutes and <6 minutes, respectively. Although the number of black Africans in the study was relatively small, our results showed that they have similar ADRs and PDRs to the white population group, contradicting popular belief.

CONCLUSIONS

The WDGMC OEU performed reasonably well against the international guidelines, despite some inadequacy in bowel preparation and lower than recommended median withdrawal times on negative-result colonoscopy. Annual auditing of clinical practice and availability of these data in the public domain will become standard of care, making this audit a baseline for longitudinal observation, assessing the impact of interventions, and contributing to the development of local guidelines.

摘要

背景

在南非,尚无针对结肠镜检查(调查和诊断肠道病理的金标准)开展或进行质量评估的国家指南。

目的

描述威特沃特斯兰德大学唐纳德·戈登医学中心(Wits Donald Gordon Medical Centre,WDGMC)门诊内镜科(outpatient endoscopy unit,OEU)行结肠镜检查患者的临床特征,并使用程序质量指标评估其操作实践。

方法

我们对在成年人(≥18 岁)中进行的结肠镜检查进行了前瞻性临床实践审核。共纳入 1643 例患者,收集的变量可评估肠道准备的充分性、退镜时间和盲肠插管率(cecal intubation rate,CIR)、息肉检出率(polyp detection rate,PDR)和腺瘤检出率(adenoma detection rate,ADR)的计算。我们根据性别、年龄、人群组、退镜时间和肠道准备情况对 PDR 和 ADR 进行分层。通过卡方检验比较不同患者组的 CIR、PDR 和 ADR 估计值;2×2 表使用 Fisher 确切检验。p 值<0.05 被认为具有统计学意义。该审核使用美国胃肠内镜学会(American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy,ASGE)/美国胃肠病学会(American College of Gastroenterology,ACG)结直肠癌(colorectal cancer,CRC)工作组的推荐基准来评估个体内镜医师的表现和内镜科的整体表现。

结果

患者的平均年龄为 55.7 岁(标准差(standard deviation,SD)为 14.4;范围 18-91),约 60%为女性,多数(75.5%)为白人。在门诊患者中,77.6%肠道准备充分(ASGE/ACG 基准≥85%)。总体 CIR 为 97.0%,筛查结肠镜检查为 96.3%(ASGE/ACG 基准总体≥90%,筛查结肠镜检查≥95%)。阴性结果筛查结肠镜检查的中位退镜时间为 5.7 分钟(四分位距(interquartile range,IQR)为 4.2-9.3;范围为 1.1-20.6)(ASGE/ACG 基准≥6 分钟),PDR 和 ADR 分别为 27.6%和 15.6%(ASGE/ACG 基准 ADR≥25%)。我们发现,退镜时间≥6 分钟和<6 分钟的结肠镜检查的 PDR 和 ADR 分别增加了 23.7%和 14.1%。尽管研究中黑人非洲人的数量相对较少,但我们的结果表明,他们与白人人群的 ADR 和 PDR 相似,这与普遍看法相矛盾。

结论

尽管肠道准备存在一定不足,阴性结果结肠镜检查的退镜时间低于推荐中位数,但 WDGMC OEU 的操作基本符合国际指南。对临床实践进行年度审核,并将这些数据公开提供,将成为标准护理,使本次审核成为纵向观察的基准,评估干预措施的影响,并为当地指南的制定做出贡献。

相似文献

1
The 'ins and outs' of colonoscopy at Wits Donald Gordon Medical Centre, South Africa: A practice audit of the outpatient endoscopy unit.南非威特沃特斯兰德大学唐纳德·戈登医学中心结肠镜检查的“内幕”:门诊内镜科室的实践审核。
S Afr Med J. 2020 Nov 27;110(12):1186-1190. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2020.v110i12.14419.
2
Prevalence and characteristics of incidental colorectal polyps in patients undergoing colonoscopy at a South African tertiary institution.南非一家三级医疗机构行结肠镜检查患者中偶然发现的结直肠息肉的流行情况和特征。
S Afr Med J. 2020 Nov 27;110(12):1191-1194. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2020.v110i12.14582.
3
The conversion factor for predicting adenoma detection rate from polyp detection rate varies according to colonoscopy indication and patient sex.预测腺瘤检出率的转换因子因结肠镜检查适应证和患者性别而异。
Eur J Cancer Prev. 2020 Jul;29(4):294-302. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000558.
4
Data quality and colonoscopy performance indicators in the prevalent round of a FIT-based colorectal cancer screening program.基于粪便免疫化学检测的结直肠癌筛查项目现患轮次中的数据质量和结肠镜检查性能指标
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2019 Apr;54(4):471-477. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2019.1597158. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
5
Quality indicators for screening colonoscopy and colonoscopist performance and the subsequent risk of interval colorectal cancer: a systematic review.筛查结肠镜检查的质量指标、结肠镜检查医师的表现及随后发生间隔期结直肠癌的风险:一项系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2019 Nov;17(11):2265-2300. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003927.
6
Quality of colonoscopy in an organised colorectal cancer screening programme with immunochemical faecal occult blood test: the EQuIPE study (Evaluating Quality Indicators of the Performance of Endoscopy).免疫化学粪便潜血试验在结直肠癌筛查项目中结肠镜检查的质量:EQuIPE 研究(评估内镜性能质量指标)。
Gut. 2015 Sep;64(9):1389-96. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307954. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
7
Retrograde inspection standard forward view for the detection of colorectal adenomas during colonoscopy: A back-to-back randomized clinical trial.结肠镜检查中逆行观察标准前视图检测结直肠腺瘤:一项背靠背随机临床试验。
World J Gastroenterol. 2020 Apr 28;26(16):1962-1970. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i16.1962.
8
Adenoma detection rates in an opportunistic screening colonoscopy program in Iran, a country with rising colorectal cancer incidence.在伊朗这个结直肠癌发病率不断上升的国家,一项机会性筛查结肠镜检查项目中的腺瘤检出率。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2014 Nov 18;14:196. doi: 10.1186/s12876-014-0196-8.
9
Defining and Applying Locally Relevant Benchmarks for the Adenoma Detection Rate.定义和应用具有本地相关性的腺瘤检出率基准。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2019 Aug;114(8):1315-1321. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000120.
10
Good is better than excellent: bowel preparation quality and adenoma detection rates.良好优于优秀:肠道准备质量与腺瘤检出率。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Mar;81(3):691-699.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.10.032.

引用本文的文献

1
Self-adherence to post-colonoscopy consults in patients undergoing diagnostic colonoscopy: Findings from a cross-sectional, quantitative survey at a South African quaternary hospital.接受诊断性结肠镜检查的患者对结肠镜检查后咨询的依从性:南非四级医院横断面定量调查的结果。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 18;18(7):e0288752. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288752. eCollection 2023.