Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia.
School of Social Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Addiction. 2021 Jul;116(7):1882-1891. doi: 10.1111/add.15400. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
To better understand the longstanding inequalities concerning alcohol and tobacco use, we aimed to quantify the effect of household economic security on alcohol and tobacco consumption and expenditure.
Longitudinal analysis using data from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia survey (2001-2018).
Australia PARTICIPANTS: A nationally representative cohort of 24 134 adults aged 25-64 years (187 378 observations).
Tobacco and alcohol use (Yes/No), frequency of use of each per week, household expenditure on each per week, household weekly income (Consumer Price Index [CPI]-adjusted), employment security (based on conditions of employment) and housing affordability (housing costs relative to household income).
At baseline, one-quarter of the sample used tobacco and 87% used alcohol. Annual increases in household income were associated with the increased use of both tobacco and alcohol for people in households in the lowest 40% of the national income distribution (OR = 1.13, 95% CI = 1.03-1.23 and OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.04-1.20, respectively) with no similar income effect observed for higher-income households. In relation to smoking, the odds of a resident's tobacco use increased when their household was unemployed (OR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.07-1.62). In relation to alcohol, the odds of use decreased when households were insecurely employed or unemployed, or housing costs were unaffordable (OR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.77-0.98, OR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.55-0.80 and OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.75-0.93, respectively). This was also reflected in the reduced odds of risky drinking (defined in accordance with Australian guidelines) when housing became unaffordable or households became unemployed (OR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.81-0.99; OR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.69-0.98, respectively).
In Australia, smoking and drinking appear to exhibit different socio-behavioural characteristics and household unemployment appears to be a strong determinant of smoking.
为了更好地理解长期存在的酒精和烟草使用不平等问题,我们旨在量化家庭经济保障对酒精和烟草消费和支出的影响。
利用澳大利亚家庭、收入和劳动力动态调查(2001-2018 年)的数据进行纵向分析。
澳大利亚
一个全国代表性的 25-64 岁成年人队列,共 24134 人(187378 次观察)。
烟草和酒精使用(是/否)、每周每种使用的频率、每周每种的家庭支出、家庭每周收入(经消费者价格指数调整)、就业保障(基于就业条件)和住房负担能力(住房成本相对于家庭收入)。
在基线时,样本中有四分之一的人使用烟草,87%的人使用酒精。家庭收入的年增长率与收入处于全国收入分配最低 40%的家庭中烟草和酒精使用的增加有关(OR=1.13,95%CI=1.03-1.23 和 OR=1.12,95%CI=1.04-1.20),而对于较高收入家庭则没有类似的收入效应。关于吸烟,当居民的家庭失业时,他们吸烟的可能性增加(OR=1.32,95%CI=1.07-1.62)。关于酒精,当家庭就业不稳定或失业,或住房成本不可负担时,使用的可能性降低(OR=0.87,95%CI=0.77-0.98,OR=0.66,95%CI=0.55-0.80 和 OR=0.84,95%CI=0.75-0.93)。当住房变得负担不起或家庭失业时,风险饮酒(根据澳大利亚指南定义)的可能性也降低(OR=0.90,95%CI=0.81-0.99;OR=0.82,95%CI=0.69-0.98)。
在澳大利亚,吸烟和饮酒似乎表现出不同的社会行为特征,家庭失业似乎是吸烟的一个重要决定因素。