Sheffield Alcohol Research Group, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Addiction. 2021 Sep;116(9):2538-2547. doi: 10.1111/add.15430. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
Dual purchasers of alcohol and tobacco are at increased health risk from the interacting health impacts of alcohol and tobacco use. They are also at financial risk from exposure to the dual financial cost of policies that increase alcohol and tobacco prices. Understanding whose alcohol and tobacco use exposes them to these health and financial risks is important for understanding the inequality impacts of control policies. This study explores the extent to which household spending on alcohol and tobacco combined varies between socio-economic groups and compares this with results for households which purchase only one of the commodities.
Cross-sectional analysis of household-level alcohol and tobacco purchasing data.
United Kingdom, 2012-17.
PARTICIPANTS/CASES: A total of 26 021 households.
We analysed transaction-level data from individual 14-day spending diaries in the Living Cost and Food Survey (LCFS). We used this to calculate expenditure, volumes of alcohol and tobacco purchased, and the price paid per unit of alcohol (1 unit = 8 g) and per stick of tobacco. This was compared with equivalized total expenditure and quintiles of equivalized household income. Prices were calibrated and pack sizes were imputed using empirical sales data from Nielsen/CGA to correct for reporting bias.
Dual purchasing households spent [95% confidence interval] more on alcohol and more on tobacco than their single-purchasing counterparts. In general, lower-income households spent less on both alcohol and tobacco than higher-income households. Furthermore, dual purchasing households in the lowest income group were most exposed to potential increases in price than were other income groups, with (CI = 12.41-13.15%) of their total household budget spent on alcohol and tobacco.
Dual purchasers of alcohol and tobacco in the United Kingdom appear to be concentrated evenly among income groups. However, dual purchasers may experience particularly large effects from pricing policies, as they spend a substantially higher proportion of their overall household expenditure on alcohol and tobacco than do households that purchase only one of the commodities.
同时购买烟酒的双重消费者,其烟酒使用行为会对健康产生交互影响,健康风险也随之增加。同时,由于政策提高烟酒价格而导致的双重经济成本,他们也面临着经济风险。了解哪些人的烟酒使用行为使他们面临这些健康和经济风险,对于理解控制政策的不平等影响很重要。本研究探讨了家庭烟酒消费支出在社会经济群体之间的差异程度,并将其与仅购买其中一种商品的家庭进行了比较。
家庭烟酒购买数据的横断面分析。
英国,2012-17 年。
参与者/病例:共 26021 户家庭。
我们分析了来自生活成本和食品调查(LCFS)中个人 14 天消费日记的交易级数据。我们用这些数据来计算支出、烟酒购买量以及每单位酒精(1 单位=8 克)和每支烟的价格。这与等价总收入和等价家庭收入五分位数进行了比较。我们使用尼尔森/CGA 的经验销售数据来校准价格并推断包装尺寸,以纠正报告偏差。
同时购买烟酒的家庭比只购买一种商品的家庭在烟酒上的支出更多。一般来说,低收入家庭在烟酒上的支出都低于高收入家庭。此外,收入最低组的双重购买家庭比其他收入群体更容易受到价格上涨的影响,他们将(CI=12.41-13.15%)的家庭总预算用于烟酒。
在英国,同时购买烟酒的双重消费者似乎在收入群体中均匀分布。然而,由于他们在烟酒上的支出占家庭总支出的比例远远高于只购买其中一种商品的家庭,因此他们可能会受到定价政策的特别大的影响。