Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Howard University College of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Addiction. 2021 Aug;116(8):2135-2149. doi: 10.1111/add.15399. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
To address the widespread severe problems with opioid use disorder, buprenorphine-naloxone treatment provided by primary care physicians has greatly expanded treatment access; however, treatment is often provided with minimal or no behavioral interventions. Whether or which behavioral interventions are feasible to implement in various settings and improve treatment outcomes has not been established. This study aimed to evaluate two behavioral interventions to improve buprenorphine-naloxone treatment.
A 2 × 2 factorial, repeated-measures, open-label, randomized clinical trial.
General medical practice offices in Muar, Malaysia.
Opioid-dependent individuals (n = 234).
Participants were randomly assigned to one of four treatment conditions and received study interventions for 24 weeks: (1) physician management with or without behavioral counseling and (2) physician management with or without abstinence-contingent buprenorphine-naloxone (ACB) take-home doses.
The primary outcomes were proportions of opioid-negative urine tests and HIV risk behaviors [assessed by audio computer-assisted AIDS risk inventory (ACASI-ARI)].
The rates of opioid-negative urine tests over 24 weeks of treatment were significantly higher with [68.2%, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 65-71] than without behavioral counseling (59.2%, 95% CI = 56-62, P < 0.001) and with (71.0%, 95% CI = 68-74) than without ACB (56.4%, 95% CI = 53-59, P < 0.001); interaction effects between and among behavioral interventions and time were not statistically significant. Scores on ACASI-ARI decreased significantly from baseline across all treatment groups (P < 0.001) and did not differ significantly with or without behavioral counseling (P = 0.099) or with or without ACB (P = 0.339).
Providing opioid-dependent patients in Muar, Malaysia with buprenorphine-naloxone and physician management plus behavioral counseling or abstinence-contingent buprenorphine-naloxone (ACB) resulted in greater reductions of opioid use compared with providing buprenorphine-naloxone and physician management without behavioral counseling or ACB.
为了解决阿片类药物使用障碍的普遍严重问题,初级保健医生提供的丁丙诺啡-纳洛酮治疗大大增加了治疗机会;然而,治疗通常是在没有或很少有行为干预的情况下进行的。在各种环境中实施哪些行为干预措施以及这些措施是否可行,以改善治疗效果,目前还没有确定。本研究旨在评估两种行为干预措施以改善丁丙诺啡-纳洛酮治疗。
一项 2×2 析因、重复测量、开放标签、随机临床试验。
马来西亚马鲁尔的普通医疗诊所。
阿片类药物依赖者(n=234)。
参与者被随机分配到四种治疗条件之一,并接受为期 24 周的研究干预:(1)有或没有行为咨询的医生管理,和(2)有或没有条件性丁丙诺啡-纳洛酮(ACB)带回家剂量的医生管理。
主要结局是阿片类药物阴性尿液检测的比例和艾滋病毒风险行为[通过音频计算机辅助艾滋病风险问卷(ACASI-ARI)评估]。
治疗 24 周时,接受行为咨询的阿片类药物阴性尿液检测率(68.2%,95%置信区间[CI] = 65-71)明显高于未接受行为咨询的(59.2%,95% CI = 56-62,P < 0.001),接受 ACB 的(71.0%,95% CI = 68-74)明显高于未接受 ACB 的(56.4%,95% CI = 53-59,P < 0.001);行为干预和时间之间的交互效应没有统计学意义。所有治疗组的 ACASI-ARI 评分从基线显著下降(P<0.001),并且与是否接受行为咨询(P=0.099)或是否接受 ACB(P=0.339)无关。
在马来西亚马鲁尔为阿片类药物依赖者提供丁丙诺啡-纳洛酮和医生管理加行为咨询或条件性丁丙诺啡-纳洛酮(ACB)治疗,与仅提供丁丙诺啡-纳洛酮和医生管理而不提供行为咨询或 ACB 治疗相比,阿片类药物的使用减少更大。