• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

水平骨切开位置对下颌升支矢状劈开截骨术后并发症发生率和神经感觉缺失的影响。

Effect of Horizontal Osteotomy Level on Complication Rates and Neurosensory Deficits After Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy.

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

J Craniofac Surg. 2021;32(5):1712-1715. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000007404.

DOI:10.1097/SCS.0000000000007404
PMID:33405452
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Horizontal osteotomy is one of the most critical step at sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) and determination of the ideal height of this horizontal osteotomy is essential to avoid nerve and vessel injury.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the level of the medial horizontal ramus cut as a risk factor for unfavorable outcomes in the SSRO.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty-four patients with dentofacial deformity who applied to Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery Department between August 2018 and August 2019 and undergone orthognathic surgery were evaluated. Out of 64, 49 patients had SSRO with or without maxillary surgery and genioplasty. Twenty-six patient had postoperative computed tomography scan with 6-months follow-up. Finally, 26 patient with 52 SSRO sides were included in this study. Computed tomography scans were evaluated and classification according to osteotomy levels was made. Postoperative neurosensory deficit, bleeding, and intraoperative complications such as bad split, visible damage to inferior alveolar bundle were assessed. Age, gender, neurosensory deficit, bad splits were analyzed and correlated with the level of the osteotomies.

RESULTS

Fifteen osteotomies were above lingula, 24 between apex and base of lingula, and 14 below lingula. One bad split occurred, and no visible damage to the inferior alveolar bundle was seen. There was no significant difference between osteotomy groups in terms of visual analogue scale (VAS) scores (P > 0.05) but in all groups; women's VAS scores are statistically significantly higher than men. (P: 0.036).

CONCLUSION

There is no correlation between the horizontal osteotomy level and intraoperative or postoperative complications. The low medial horizontal osteotomy can be safely performed in SSRO.

摘要

未加标签

水平截骨术是矢状劈开下颌支骨切开术(SSRO)中最关键的步骤之一,确定这种水平截骨术的理想高度对于避免神经和血管损伤至关重要。

目的

本研究旨在评估内侧水平支骨切开的水平作为 SSRO 不良结果的危险因素。

材料和方法

评估了 2018 年 8 月至 2019 年 8 月期间向口腔颌面外科就诊并接受正颌手术的 64 例牙颌面畸形患者。在 64 例患者中,49 例行 SSRO 联合或不联合上颌手术和颏成形术。26 例患者术后行 CT 扫描并随访 6 个月。最终,本研究纳入了 26 例患者的 52 侧 SSRO。对 CT 扫描进行评估,并根据截骨水平进行分类。评估术后神经感觉缺陷、出血以及术中并发症,如劈裂不良、下牙槽束可见损伤。分析年龄、性别、神经感觉缺陷、劈裂不良与截骨水平的关系。

结果

15 例截骨位于 Lingula 上方,24 例位于 Lingula 根尖和基底部之间,14 例位于 Lingula 下方。发生 1 例劈裂不良,未见下牙槽束明显损伤。各截骨组之间的视觉模拟评分(VAS)无显著差异(P>0.05),但在所有组中,女性的 VAS 评分均显著高于男性(P:0.036)。

结论

水平截骨位置与术中或术后并发症之间无相关性。在 SSRO 中可以安全地进行低位内侧水平截骨。

相似文献

1
Effect of Horizontal Osteotomy Level on Complication Rates and Neurosensory Deficits After Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy.水平骨切开位置对下颌升支矢状劈开截骨术后并发症发生率和神经感觉缺失的影响。
J Craniofac Surg. 2021;32(5):1712-1715. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000007404.
2
The Low Medial Horizontal Osteotomy in Patients With Atypical Ramus Morphology Undergoing Sagittal Split Osteotomy.非典型下颌支形态患者行矢状劈开截骨术时的低位内侧水平截骨术
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Oct;78(10):1813-1819. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2020.05.005. Epub 2020 May 12.
3
Evaluation of Mandibular Anatomy Associated With Bad Splits in Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy of Mandible.下颌矢状劈开截骨术中与不良劈开相关的下颌骨解剖结构评估
J Craniofac Surg. 2016 Jul;27(5):e500-4. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002798.
4
Neurosensory alterations of the inferior alveolar and mental nerve after genioplasty alone or associated with sagittal osteotomy of the mandibular ramus.单纯颏成形术或联合下颌支矢状骨切开术后下牙槽神经和颏神经的神经感觉改变
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2002 Oct;30(5):295-303. doi: 10.1016/s1010-5182(02)90311-2.
5
Surgical morbidities of sagittal split ramus osteotomy versus intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy for the correction of mandibular prognathism: a randomized clinical trial.矢状劈开下颌支骨切开术与口内垂直下颌支骨切开术治疗下颌前突的手术并发症:一项随机临床试验。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Jul;50(7):933-939. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2020.06.023. Epub 2020 Nov 6.
6
Is injury to the inferior alveolar nerve still common during orthognathic surgery? Manual twist technique for sagittal split ramus osteotomy.在正颌外科手术中,下牙槽神经损伤仍然常见吗?矢状劈开下颌支截骨术的手动扭转技术。
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Dec;56(10):946-951. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2018.10.279. Epub 2018 Nov 10.
7
Ambulatory sagittal split ramus osteotomy: strategy for enhanced recovery after surgery.门诊矢状劈开下颌支截骨术:术后加速康复策略
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023 Apr;52(4):476-480. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2022.08.015. Epub 2022 Sep 10.
8
Avoiding Inferior Alveolar Nerve Injury During Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy.避免下颌升支矢状劈开截骨术中的下牙槽神经损伤。
J Craniofac Surg. 2023 Oct 1;34(7):e706-e708. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000009688. Epub 2023 Aug 25.
9
Neurosensory alteration in the lower lip and chin area after orthognathic surgery: bilateral sagittal split osteotomy versus inverted L ramus osteotomy.正颌外科手术后下唇和颏部区域的神经感觉改变:双侧矢状劈开截骨术与倒L形升支截骨术对比
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006 May;64(5):778-84. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2006.01.009.
10
Infralingular Versus Supralingular Medial Osteotomy in Sagittal Split Osteotomy of the Mandible: A Randomized Control Study.下颌矢状劈开截骨术中舌下与舌上内侧截骨术的比较:一项随机对照研究。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023 Mar;81(3):280-286. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2022.12.008. Epub 2022 Dec 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of positions of four lingula shapes for mandibular ramus surgery.下颌升支手术中四种舌形位置的评估。
Front Oral Health. 2025 Jan 7;5:1521227. doi: 10.3389/froh.2024.1521227. eCollection 2024.
2
Computed tomography evaluation of risk factors for an undesirable buccal split during sagittal split ramus osteotomy.矢状劈开下颌支截骨术中不良颊侧裂开危险因素的计算机断层扫描评估
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 2;18(3):e0279850. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279850. eCollection 2023.