From the Department of Health Behavior and Health Education (V.H.L.), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Epidemiology (V.H.L., E.G., A.H., F.P.R., A.R.-R.), School of Public Health, Firearm Injury and Policy Research Program, Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center (V.H.L., A.S.F., J.W., L.K.W., K.P.H., F.P.R., A.R.-R.), Alcohol and Drug Abuse Institute (A.S.F.), and Department of Biostatistics (M.C.), University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics (D.B.), Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia; Department of Emergency Medicine (L.K.W.), School of Social Work (K.P.H.), Social Development Research Group (K.P.H.), and Department of Pediatrics (F.P.R.), School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021 Apr 1;90(4):722-730. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003056.
Patients with firearm injuries are at high risk of subsequent arrest and injury following hospital discharge. We sought to evaluate the effect of a 6-month joint hospital- and community-based low-intensity intervention on risk of arrest and injury among patients with firearm injuries.
We conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial, enrolling patients with firearm injuries who received treatment at Harborview Medical Center, the level 1 trauma center in Seattle, Washington, were 18 years or older at the time of injury, spoke English, were able to provide consent and a method of contact, and lived in one of the five study counties. The intervention consisted of hospital-based motivational interviewing, followed by a 6-month community-based intervention, and multiagency support. The primary outcome was the risk of subsequent arrest. The main secondary outcome was the risk of death or subsequent injury requiring treatment in the emergency department or hospitalization.
Neither assignment to or engagement with the intervention, defined as having at least 1 contact point with the support specialist, was associated with risk of arrest at 2 years post-hospital discharge (relative risk for intervention assignment, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 0.90-1.48; relative risk for intervention engagement, 1.07; 95% confidence interval, 0.74-2.19). There was similarly no association observed for subsequent injury.
This study represents one of the first randomized controlled trials of a joint hospital- and community-based intervention delivered exclusively among patients with firearm injuries. The intervention was not associated with changes in risk of arrest or injury, a finding most likely due to the low intensity of the program.
Care management, level II.
枪支伤害患者在出院后有很高的再次被捕和受伤的风险。我们试图评估一项为期 6 个月的医院和社区联合的低强度干预对枪支伤害患者被捕和受伤风险的影响。
我们进行了一项集群随机对照试验,招募了在华盛顿州西雅图市的 1 级创伤中心 Harborview Medical Center 接受治疗、受伤时年龄在 18 岁或以上、会说英语、能够提供同意和联系方式、且居住在研究的五个县之一的枪支伤害患者。干预措施包括医院内的动机访谈,随后是为期 6 个月的社区干预和多机构支持。主要结局是随后被捕的风险。主要次要结局是死亡或需要在急诊科或住院治疗的后续伤害的风险。
无论是分配到干预组还是参与干预组,即与支持专家至少有 1 个接触点,与出院后 2 年的被捕风险均无关(干预分配的相对风险,1.15;95%置信区间,0.90-1.48;干预参与的相对风险,1.07;95%置信区间,0.74-2.19)。对于随后的伤害也没有观察到类似的关联。
这项研究代表了首批专门针对枪支伤害患者的医院和社区联合干预的随机对照试验之一。该干预措施与被捕或受伤风险的变化无关,这一发现最有可能是由于该项目的低强度所致。
护理管理,II 级。