• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提高伤后随访调查的回复率:纳入自动化方式。

Improving Post-Injury Follow-up Survey Response: Incorporating Automated Modalities.

作者信息

Scheuer Hannah, Conrick Kelsey M, Mills Brianna, Solano Esther, Arbabi Saman, Bulger Eileen M, Dotolo Danae, Vil Christopher St, Vavilala Monica S, Rowhani-Rahbar Ali, Moore Megan

机构信息

University of Washington.

University at Buffalo, State University of New York.

出版信息

Res Sq. 2024 Apr 22:rs.3.rs-4248769. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4248769/v1.

DOI:10.21203/rs.3.rs-4248769/v1
PMID:38746358
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11092863/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Incorporating post-discharge data into trauma registries would allow for better research on patient outcomes, including disparities in outcomes. This pilot study tested a follow-up data collection process to be incorporated into existing trauma care systems, prioritizing low-cost automated response modalities.

METHODS

This investigation was part of a larger study that consisted of two protocols with two distinct cohorts of participants who experienced traumatic injury. Participants in both protocols were asked to provide phone, email, text, and mail contact information to complete follow-up surveys assessing patient-reported outcomes six months after injury. To increase follow-up response rates between protocol 1 and protocol 2, the study team modified the contact procedures for the protocol 2 cohort. Frequency distributions were utilized to report the frequency of follow-up response modalities and overall response rates in both protocols.

RESULTS

A total of 178 individuals responded to the 6-month follow-up survey: 88 in protocol 1 and 90 in protocol 2. After implementing new follow-up contact procedures in protocol 2 that relied more heavily on the use of automated modalities (e.g., email and text messages), the response rate increased by 17.9 percentage points. The primary response modality shifted from phone (72.7%) in protocol 1 to the combination of email (47.8%) and text (14.4%) in protocol 2.

CONCLUSIONS

Results from this investigation suggest that follow-up data can feasibly be collected from trauma patients. Use of automated follow-up methods holds promise to expand longitudinal data in the national trauma registry and broaden the understanding of disparities in patient experiences.

摘要

背景

将出院后的数据纳入创伤登记系统,有助于更好地研究患者的治疗结果,包括结果的差异。这项试点研究测试了一种后续数据收集流程,以纳入现有的创伤护理系统,优先考虑低成本的自动回复方式。

方法

本调查是一项更大规模研究的一部分,该研究由两个方案组成,涉及两组不同的创伤患者队列。两个方案的参与者都被要求提供电话、电子邮件、短信和邮寄联系方式,以完成受伤六个月后的随访调查,评估患者报告的结果。为了提高方案1和方案2之间的随访回复率,研究团队修改了方案2队列的联系程序。使用频率分布来报告两个方案中随访回复方式的频率和总体回复率。

结果

共有178人回复了6个月的随访调查:方案1中有88人,方案2中有90人。在方案2中实施了更多依赖自动方式(如电子邮件和短信)的新随访联系程序后,回复率提高了17.9个百分点。主要回复方式从方案1中的电话(72.7%)转变为方案2中的电子邮件(47.8%)和短信(14.4%)的组合。

结论

本次调查结果表明,可以切实从创伤患者中收集随访数据。使用自动随访方法有望扩展国家创伤登记系统中的纵向数据,并拓宽对患者经历差异的理解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78b6/11092863/3ebd3ea5049d/nihpp-rs4248769v1-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78b6/11092863/3ebd3ea5049d/nihpp-rs4248769v1-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78b6/11092863/3ebd3ea5049d/nihpp-rs4248769v1-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Improving Post-Injury Follow-up Survey Response: Incorporating Automated Modalities.提高伤后随访调查的回复率:纳入自动化方式。
Res Sq. 2024 Apr 22:rs.3.rs-4248769. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4248769/v1.
2
Improving post-injury follow-up survey response: incorporating automated modalities.提高受伤后随访调查的回复率:纳入自动化方式。
Inj Epidemiol. 2024 Sep 5;11(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s40621-024-00531-3.
3
Differences in Mode Preferences, Response Rates, and Mode Effect Between Automated Email and Phone Survey Systems for Patients of Primary Care Practices: Cross-Sectional Study.在初级保健实践患者中,自动化电子邮件和电话调查系统的模式偏好、响应率和模式效果差异:横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 11;23(1):e21240. doi: 10.2196/21240.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
6
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of four different strategies for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in the general population (CoV-Surv Study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a cluster-randomised, two-factorial controlled trial.在普通人群中进行 SARS-CoV-2 监测的四种不同策略的有效性和成本效益(CoV-Surv 研究):一项关于集群随机、双因素对照试验的研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Jan 8;22(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04982-z.
7
Use of email, cell phone and text message between patients and primary-care physicians: cross-sectional study in a French-speaking part of Switzerland.患者与初级保健医生之间电子邮件、手机和短信的使用:瑞士法语区的横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Oct 5;16(1):549. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1776-9.
8
Erratum: Eyestalk Ablation to Increase Ovarian Maturation in Mud Crabs.勘误:切除眼柄以增加泥蟹的卵巢成熟度。
J Vis Exp. 2023 May 26(195). doi: 10.3791/6561.
9
Centering patient perspectives to achieve injury-related health equity in trauma care systems: Improving trauma registry data.以患者为中心,实现创伤护理系统中与伤害相关的健康公平:改善创伤登记数据。
Injury. 2023 Sep;54(9):110847. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.110847. Epub 2023 Jun 2.
10
Survey Protocols, Response Rates, and Representation of Underserved Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.调查方案、应答率和服务不足患者的代表性:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Jan 5;5(1):e234929. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.4929.

本文引用的文献

1
Does patient preference for online or telephone follow-up impact on response rates and data completeness following injury?患者对在线或电话随访的偏好是否会影响损伤后的应答率和数据完整性?
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2022 Nov 1;93(5):679-685. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003592. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
2
Improving Data Collection and Abstraction to Assess Health Equity in Trauma Care.改善数据收集和提取,以评估创伤护理中的健康公平性。
J Med Syst. 2022 Mar 9;46(4):21. doi: 10.1007/s10916-022-01804-4.
3
Core outcome measures for research in traumatic injury survivors: The National Trauma Research Action Plan modified Delphi consensus study.
创伤损伤幸存者研究的核心结局指标:国家创伤研究行动计划改良德尔菲共识研究
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2022 May 1;92(5):916-923. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003546. Epub 2022 Jan 25.
4
Helping individuals with firearm injuries: A cluster randomized trial.帮助枪支伤害个体:一项整群随机试验。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021 Apr 1;90(4):722-730. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003056.
5
Research on Injury Disparities: A Scoping Review.伤害差异研究:一项范围综述
Health Equity. 2019 Oct 17;3(1):504-511. doi: 10.1089/heq.2019.0044. eCollection 2019.
6
Routine incorporation of longer-term patient-reported outcomes into a Dutch trauma registry.常规纳入更长期的患者报告结局至荷兰创伤登记处。
Qual Life Res. 2019 Oct;28(10):2731-2739. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02211-y. Epub 2019 May 16.
7
The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners.REDCap 联盟:构建软件平台合作伙伴的国际社区。
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208. Epub 2019 May 9.
8
PROMIS-29 v2.0 profile physical and mental health summary scores.PROMIS-29 v2.0 概况身心健康综合评分。
Qual Life Res. 2018 Jul;27(7):1885-1891. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1842-3. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
9
The lost to trauma patient follow-up: a system or patient problem.创伤后失访患者的随访:是系统问题还是患者问题。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Dec;73(6):1507-11. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31826fc928.
10
Population-based capture of long-term functional and quality of life outcomes after major trauma: the experiences of the Victorian State Trauma Registry.基于人群的重大创伤后长期功能和生活质量结局的记录:维多利亚州创伤登记处的经验
J Trauma. 2010 Sep;69(3):532-6; discussion 536. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181e5125b.