Papuga Jan, Cízová Eva, Karolczuk Aleksander
Department of Instrumentation and Control Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Center of Advanced Aerospace Technology, Czech Technical University in Prague, Technická 4, 16607 Prague 6, Czech Republic.
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Technická 4, 16607 Prague 6, Czech Republic.
Materials (Basel). 2021 Jan 4;14(1):206. doi: 10.3390/ma14010206.
The paper discusses one of the key features in the multiaxial fatigue strength evaluation-the procedure in which the stress path is analyzed to provide relevant measures of parameters required by multiaxial criteria. The selection of this procedure affects the complete equivalent stress derived for any multiaxial load combinations. Three major concepts-the minimum circumscribed circle, minimum circumscribed ellipse, and moment of inertia methods-are described. Analytical solutions of their evaluation for multiaxial stress state with components described by harmonic functions are provided. The concepts are validated on available experimental data when included into six different multiaxial fatigue strength criteria. The results show that the moment of inertia results in too conservative results. Differences between both methods of circumscribed entities are much smaller. There are indications however that the minimum circumscribed ellipse solution works better for critical plane criteria and for the criteria based on stress tensor transformation into the Ilyushin deviatoric space. On the other hand, the minimum circumscribed ellipse solution tends to shift integral criteria to the conservative side.
本文讨论了多轴疲劳强度评估中的一个关键特征——分析应力路径以提供多轴准则所需参数相关度量的过程。该过程的选择会影响为任何多轴载荷组合得出的完全等效应力。描述了三个主要概念——最小外接圆、最小外接椭圆和惯性矩方法。给出了用调和函数描述分量的多轴应力状态下它们评估的解析解。将这些概念纳入六个不同的多轴疲劳强度准则时,根据现有实验数据对其进行了验证。结果表明,惯性矩得出的结果过于保守。两种外接实体方法之间的差异要小得多。然而,有迹象表明,最小外接椭圆解对于临界平面准则以及基于应力张量变换到伊留申偏量空间的准则效果更好。另一方面,最小外接椭圆解往往会使积分准则偏向保守一侧。