Koduah Adwoa Owusuaa, Amoah Padmore Adusei, Nkansah Jacob Oppong, Leung Angela Y M
Center of Gerontological Nursing, School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Institute of Policy Studies, Asia Pacific Institute of Ageing Studies, and School of Graduate Studies, Lingnan University, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Jan 4;9(1):38. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9010038.
This study examined student and practising nurses' health literacy knowledge, and its correlates in Ghana. It was underpinned by an adapted version of the Institute of Medicine's (IOM) conceptual framework of health literacy. We used convenience and snowball sampling techniques to collect data from 876 nurses (477 student nurses and 399 practising nurses) in a cross-sectional survey from February 2019 to June 2019. The respondents were drawn from all the former ten administrative regions of Ghana. Approximately 75.4% of the respondents had heard of health literacy. However, health literacy knowledge was generally low (average score of 6.6 out of 20) among both groups, with student nurses (average score of 5.8 out of 20) having significantly lower scores than practising nurses (average score of 7.4 out of 20). Factors associated with health literacy knowledge among student nurses included gender (male, B = -0.499, < 0.01), trust in others (B = -0.874, < 0.001), cultural values (B = 0.276, < 0.001), year of study (B = 0.244, < 0.05), and frequency of curative care use (B = -0.236, < 0.05). For practising nurses, trust (B = -1.252, < 0.01), cultural values (B = 0.357, < 0.01), and working experience (B = 0.612, < 0.01) were associated with their health literacy knowledge. Thus, responses targeted at gaps in health literacy knowledge of student and practising nurses must be sensitive to personal characteristics (e.g., gender), social values (e.g., issues of trust, and cultural beliefs and practices), as well as factors relating to nursing education and experience.
本研究调查了加纳学生护士和在职护士的健康素养知识及其相关因素。该研究以美国医学研究所(IOM)健康素养概念框架的改编版为基础。在2019年2月至2019年6月的横断面调查中,我们采用便利抽样和滚雪球抽样技术,从876名护士(477名学生护士和399名在职护士)中收集数据。受访者来自加纳之前的所有十个行政区。约75.4%的受访者听说过健康素养。然而,两组的健康素养知识普遍较低(20分制的平均分为6.6分),其中学生护士(20分制的平均分为5.8分)的得分显著低于在职护士(20分制的平均分为7.4分)。与学生护士健康素养知识相关的因素包括性别(男性,B = -0.499,<0.01)、对他人的信任(B = -0.874,<0.001)、文化价值观(B = 0.276,<0.001)、学习年份(B = 0.244,<0.05)以及使用治疗性护理的频率(B = -0.236,<0.05)。对于在职护士,信任(B = -1.252,<0.01)、文化价值观(B = 0.357,<0.01)和工作经验(B = 0.612,<0.01)与他们的健康素养知识相关。因此,针对学生护士和在职护士健康素养知识差距的应对措施必须考虑到个人特征(如性别)、社会价值观(如信任问题、文化信仰和习俗)以及与护理教育和经验相关的因素。