• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

髋关节翻修术中的模块化锥形改型柄:中期结果。

Modular tapered conical revision stem in hip revision surgery: mid- term results.

机构信息

Sezione di Chirurgia Protesica ad Indirizzo Robotico - Unità di Traumatologia dello Sport, U.O. Ortopedia e Traumatologia Fondazione Poliambulanza, Via Bissolati 57, 25124, Brescia, Italy.

Dipartimento dell'Anca e Traumatologico, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Jan 6;22(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03886-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12891-020-03886-y
PMID:33407327
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7786466/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this paper is to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of a fluted tapered modular distal-fixation stem at medium to long-term follow-up. The hypothesis of this investigation was to verify if the use of this implant design may have provided potential advantages in femoral revisions and post-traumatic instances where the restoration of the anatomy was the prime concern.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 62 cases of femoral revision surgeries, performed in Paprosky type IIIA and IIIB bone defects between January 2001 and December 2011 with a mean follow-up of 8.5 ± 1.5 years (range 5.1-15.9 years) where a modular fluted stem was used. The clinical assessment was performed with the Harris Hip Score (HHS), and the radiographic evaluation was carried in order to assess the stability of the femoral component. Intra-operative and postoperative complications were recorded, and the rates of complications and revisions for any cause were determined.

RESULTS

Mean HHS improved 35.4 points from the preoperative assessment. Radiographic evaluation showed a stable stem anchorage in 90.3% of the cases at the last follow-up. Five (8%) implants required additional surgery. Neither breakage of the stem nor loosening of the taper junction were recorded. Kaplan-Meier survivorship was 89.4% (CI: 88.8-90%) for any complication and 92.3% (CI: 91.8-92.7%) according to revision for any causes at 81 months follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that this stem design is a reliable option in cases of complex femoral bone defects, as well as in cases with high functional deficiencies, with promising survivorship.

摘要

背景

本文旨在评估一种带螺纹锥形模块化远端固定股骨柄在中至长期随访时的临床和影像学结果。本研究的假设是验证这种植入物设计是否可能在股骨翻修和创伤后病例中具有潜在优势,在这些病例中,恢复解剖结构是首要关注点。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 2001 年 1 月至 2011 年 12 月期间 62 例 Paprosky Ⅲ A 和 Ⅲ B 型骨缺损的股骨翻修手术,平均随访 8.5±1.5 年(5.1-15.9 年),其中使用了模块化带螺纹股骨柄。临床评估采用 Harris 髋关节评分(HHS),影像学评估用于评估股骨部件的稳定性。记录术中及术后并发症,并确定并发症和任何原因的翻修率。

结果

HHS 平均从术前评估提高了 35.4 分。在最后一次随访时,90.3%的病例显示股骨柄稳定固定。有 5 例(8%)需要进一步手术。未记录到柄的断裂或锥形连接松动。Kaplan-Meier 生存率为 89.4%(CI:88.8-90%),任何并发症的 81 个月随访时为 92.3%(CI:91.8-92.7%)。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,这种柄设计是复杂股骨骨缺损病例以及功能严重不足病例的可靠选择,具有良好的生存率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/955b/7786466/33663e034a29/12891_2020_3886_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/955b/7786466/6ba2dc026465/12891_2020_3886_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/955b/7786466/0fb2580919d2/12891_2020_3886_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/955b/7786466/426471df9875/12891_2020_3886_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/955b/7786466/33663e034a29/12891_2020_3886_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/955b/7786466/6ba2dc026465/12891_2020_3886_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/955b/7786466/0fb2580919d2/12891_2020_3886_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/955b/7786466/426471df9875/12891_2020_3886_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/955b/7786466/33663e034a29/12891_2020_3886_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Modular tapered conical revision stem in hip revision surgery: mid- term results.髋关节翻修术中的模块化锥形改型柄:中期结果。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Jan 6;22(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03886-y.
2
Modular Fluted Tapered Stems in Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.模块化带槽锥形柄在无菌翻修全髋关节置换术中的应用。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 May 17;99(10):873-881. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00423.
3
Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes of Modular Tapered Fluted Stems for Femoral Revision for Paprosky III and IV Femoral Defects or Vancouver B2 and B3 Femoral Fractures.模块化锥形开槽柄在治疗 Paprosky III 和 IV 型股骨缺损或 Vancouver B2 和 B3 型股骨骨折的股骨翻修中的影像学和临床结果。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Apr;35(4):1069-1073. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.11.039. Epub 2019 Nov 30.
4
Femoral revision in total hip arthroplasty using a cementless modular stem: clinical and radiological results with a 8-year follow-up.全髋关节置换术中使用非骨水泥模块化柄进行股骨翻修:8 年随访的临床和影像学结果。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Mar;144(3):1369-1377. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-05066-8. Epub 2023 Oct 24.
5
Long-Term Outcomes of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Tapered and Fluted Modular Stem: A Mean Follow-Up of 16 Years.使用锥形和开槽模块化柄的翻修全髋关节置换术的长期结果:平均随访 16 年。
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Dec;37(12):2420-2426. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.06.017. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
6
Uncemented femoral revision arthroplasty using a modular tapered, fluted titanium stem: 5- to 16-year results of 163 cases.非骨水泥股骨翻修关节置换术采用模块化锥形、开槽钛合金柄:163 例 5 至 16 年的结果。
Acta Orthop. 2014 Dec;85(6):562-9. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2014.958809. Epub 2014 Sep 1.
7
High Survivorship With Cementless Stems and Cortical Strut Allografts for Large Femoral Bone Defects in Revision THA.非骨水泥型股骨柄与皮质支撑异体骨移植用于翻修全髋关节置换术中大股骨骨缺损的高生存率
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Sep;473(9):2990-3000. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4358-y. Epub 2015 May 27.
8
Nonmodular Tapered Fluted Titanium Stems Osseointegrate Reliably at Short Term in Revision THAs.非模块化锥形带槽钛柄在翻修全髋关节置换术中短期内能可靠地实现骨整合。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Jan;475(1):186-192. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5091-x. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
9
Mid- to Long-Term Outcomes of Cementless Modular, Fluted, Tapered Stem for Massive Femoral Bone Loss in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.非骨水泥模块化、开槽、锥形柄在翻修全髋关节置换术中治疗大块股骨骨缺损的中期至长期疗效。
Orthop Surg. 2021 May;13(3):989-1000. doi: 10.1111/os.12936. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
10
Implant breakage and revision factors for modular fluted tapered stems in revision total hip arthroplasty.翻修全髋关节置换术中模块化带槽锥形柄的植入物断裂及翻修因素
Hip Int. 2024 Mar;34(2):207-214. doi: 10.1177/11207000231180065. Epub 2023 Jun 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of femoral stem alignment on periprosthetic bone density in THA: a study of the Avenir Complete stem.股骨柄对线对全髋关节置换术中假体周围骨密度的影响:一项关于Avenir Complete柄的研究。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Dec 21;145(1):74. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05617-7.
2
Clinical and functional outcomes of a modular fluted titanium stem in complex hip surgery with femoral bone loss.模块化带槽钛柄在伴有股骨骨丢失的复杂髋关节手术中的临床及功能结果
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2024 Nov 26;59:102843. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102843. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Implant Survival of an Uncemented Modular Femoral Implant in Patients With Severe Femoral Bone Loss and 2-Stage Hip Revision.

本文引用的文献

1
Is There a Benefit to Modularity for Femoral Revisions When Using a Splined, Tapered Titanium Stem?使用带花键、锥形钛合金柄时,股骨翻修的模块化是否有益?
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Jun;35(6S):S278-S283. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.12.041. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
2
Classifications In Brief: The Paprosky Classification of Femoral Bone Loss.简要分类:股骨骨丢失的帕罗斯基分类法
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Mar;475(3):917-921. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5012-z. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
3
Trunnionosis in total hip arthroplasty: a review.全髋关节置换术中的股骨柄松动:综述
严重股骨骨量丢失患者二期髋关节翻修中使用的非骨水泥型模块化股骨假体的植入物存活率
Adv Orthop. 2024 Oct 25;2024:6158822. doi: 10.1155/2024/6158822. eCollection 2024.
4
Last generation fluted modular titanium stem in revision hip arthroplasty: a narrative review of mid- and long-term outcomes.翻修髋关节置换术中的上一代带槽模块化钛柄:中长期结果的叙述性综述
Ann Jt. 2024 Jan 18;9:5. doi: 10.21037/aoj-23-35. eCollection 2024.
5
Reconstruction intramedullary nailing for a failed subtrochanteric Seinsheimer type IIB fracture: a case report.重建髓内钉治疗股骨转子下Seinsheimer IIB型骨折失败病例报告
Front Surg. 2023 May 12;10:1172971. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1172971. eCollection 2023.
6
KNEE PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURES IN THE ELDERLY: CURRENT CONCEPT.老年人膝关节假体周围骨折:当前概念
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2022 Oct 13;14(6):38566. doi: 10.52965/001c.38566. eCollection 2022.
7
Extracapsular femoral neck fractures treated with total hip arthroplasty: identification of a population with better outcomes.采用全髋关节置换术治疗的股骨颈囊外骨折:确定预后较好的人群。
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2022 Oct 13;14(6):38576. doi: 10.52965/001c.38576. eCollection 2022.
8
Interprosthetic and interimplant femoral fractures: is bone strut allograft augmentation with ORIF a validity alternative solution in elderly?人工关节间和植入物间股骨骨折:对于老年人,切开复位内固定术联合异体骨支柱移植是否是一种有效的替代解决方案?
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2022 Oct 13;14(6):38558. doi: 10.52965/001c.38558. eCollection 2022.
9
Subtrochanteric femoral fractures: A case series of 194 patients treated with long and short intramedullary nails.股骨转子下骨折:194例采用长短髓内钉治疗的病例系列
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2022 Oct 13;14(6):38613. doi: 10.52965/001c.38613. eCollection 2022.
10
Distal femur complex fractures in elderly patients treated with megaprosthesis: Results in a case series of 11 patients.采用大型假体治疗老年患者股骨远端复杂骨折:11例病例系列研究结果
World J Orthop. 2022 May 18;13(5):454-464. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v13.i5.454.
J Orthop Traumatol. 2016 Mar;17(1):1-6. doi: 10.1007/s10195-016-0391-1. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
4
Osteointegration of an uncemented modular revision stem implanted during revision hip surgery.髋关节翻修手术中植入的非骨水泥型模块化翻修柄的骨整合情况。
Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove). 2014;57(3):105-11. doi: 10.14712/18059694.2014.48.
5
Uncemented femoral revision arthroplasty using a modular tapered, fluted titanium stem: 5- to 16-year results of 163 cases.非骨水泥股骨翻修关节置换术采用模块化锥形、开槽钛合金柄:163 例 5 至 16 年的结果。
Acta Orthop. 2014 Dec;85(6):562-9. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2014.958809. Epub 2014 Sep 1.
6
Massive bone loss: allograft-prosthetic composites and beyond.大量骨质流失:同种异体移植假体复合物及其他
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Nov;94(11 Suppl A):61-4. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B11.30791.
7
Femoral revision with the Wagner tapered stem: a ten- to 15-year follow-up study.使用瓦格纳锥形柄进行股骨翻修:一项10至15年的随访研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 Oct;93(10):1320-6. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B10.25927.
8
Minimum 5-year follow-up of a cementless, modular, tapered stem in hip revision arthroplasty.髋关节翻修术中非骨水泥、模块化、锥形柄的最少 5 年随访。
J Arthroplasty. 2011 Jan;26(1):16-23. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.11.009. Epub 2010 Feb 9.
9
Stem modularity alone is not effective in reducing dislocation rate in hip revision surgery.单纯的干骺端模块并不能有效降低髋关节翻修手术中的脱位率。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2009 Dec;10(4):167-71. doi: 10.1007/s10195-009-0076-0. Epub 2009 Nov 18.
10
The epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States.美国翻修全髋关节置换术的流行病学
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Jan;91(1):128-33. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00155.