Suppr超能文献

模块化带槽锥形柄在无菌翻修全髋关节置换术中的应用。

Modular Fluted Tapered Stems in Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.

机构信息

1Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery (M.P.A., U.C., A.D.H., D.G.L., and D.J.B.) and Health Sciences Research (D.R.L.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 May 17;99(10):873-881. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00423.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Modular fluted tapered stems have become the most commonly employed category of femoral component in revision hip arthroplasty in North America as a result of favorable early results and simplicity of use. Despite wide adoption, the majority of published data are limited to relatively small series with modest follow-up. The goal of the current study was to determine the success rate and factors associated with success, failure, and complications of the use of modular fluted tapered stems in aseptic revision total hip arthroplasties (THAs) in a large patient cohort.

METHODS

We identified 519 aseptic femoral revisions during which a modular fluted tapered stem was utilized. Clinical outcomes, Kaplan-Meier survivorship, radiographic outcomes, and complications were assessed. The mean age at revision arthroplasty was 70 years, the mean body mass index (BMI) was 29 kg/m, and the mean duration of follow-up was 4.5 years (range, 2 to 14 years).

RESULTS

The mean Harris hip score (HHS) improved significantly from 51 points preoperatively to 76 points at 2 years (p < 0.001). This improvement was maintained at the last follow-up evaluation (mean HHS = 75 points). At the time of the most recent follow-up, 16 femoral revisions had been performed: 6 because of aseptic loosening, 4 because of infection, 3 because of instability, 2 because of periprosthetic fracture, and 1 because of stem fracture. The 10-year survivorship was 96% with revision for any reason as the end point and 90% with any reoperation as the end point. Of the patients who were alive and had not undergone revision at the time of final follow-up, 12 had stem subsidence but all but 1 of these stems had stabilized after subsiding. Postoperative complications were noted in 12% of the cases. Repeat revision due to femoral component loosening was not correlated with the preoperative bone-loss category or patient demographic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large series, femoral revision with a modular fluted tapered stem provided a high rate of osseointegration and sustained improvement in clinical scores at the time of the last follow-up. There was also a high rate of successful implant fixation across all categories of preoperative bone loss and an acceptable rate of complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

摘要

背景

由于早期结果良好且使用简便,模块化带槽锥形柄已成为北美翻修全髋关节置换术(THA)中最常用的股骨假体类别。尽管应用广泛,但大多数已发表的数据仅限于相对较小的系列且随访时间较短。本研究的目的是在大型患者队列中确定使用模块化带槽锥形柄进行无菌性翻修全髋关节置换术(THA)的成功率以及与成功、失败和并发症相关的因素。

方法

我们在 519 例无菌性股骨翻修术中使用了模块化带槽锥形柄,评估了临床结果、Kaplan-Meier 生存率、影像学结果和并发症。翻修时的平均年龄为 70 岁,平均体重指数(BMI)为 29kg/m2,平均随访时间为 4.5 年(2 至 14 年)。

结果

术前平均 Harris 髋关节评分(HHS)为 51 分,术后 2 年时显著改善至 76 分(p<0.001)。在最后一次随访评估时仍保持这一改善(平均 HHS=75 分)。在最近一次随访时,有 16 例股骨翻修:6 例因无菌性松动,4 例因感染,3 例因不稳定,2 例因假体周围骨折,1 例因柄骨折。以任何原因翻修为终点时,10 年生存率为 96%,以任何再手术为终点时为 90%。在最终随访时存活且未翻修的患者中,12 例有柄下沉,但除 1 例外,所有下沉的柄都在稳定后停止下沉。术后并发症发生率为 12%。因股骨组件松动而再次翻修与术前骨丢失类别或患者人口统计学因素无关。

结论

在这项大型研究中,使用模块化带槽锥形柄进行股骨翻修可实现高骨整合率,并在最后一次随访时持续改善临床评分。在所有术前骨丢失类别中,都有很高的成功固定率,且并发症发生率可以接受。

证据水平

治疗性 IV 级。有关证据水平的完整说明,请参见作者说明。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验