Laboratory of Animal Reproduction, Faculty of Bioscience and Bioindustry, Tokushima University, 2272-1 Ishii, Myozai-gun, Tokushima, 779-3233, Japan.
Faculty of Veterinary Science, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.
BMC Res Notes. 2021 Jan 6;14(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13104-020-05412-8.
Cytoplasmic microinjection and electroporation of the CRISPR/Cas9 system into zygotes are used for generating genetically modified pigs. However, these methods create mosaic mutations in embryos. In this study, we evaluated whether the gene editing method and embryonic stage for gene editing affect the gene editing efficiency of porcine embryos.
First, we designed five guide RNAs (gRNAs) targeting the B4GALNT2 gene and evaluated mutation efficiency by introducing each gRNA with Cas9 protein into zygotes by electroporation. Next, the optimized gRNA with Cas9 protein was introduced into 1-cell and 2-cell stage embryos by either microinjection or electroporation. The sequence of gRNA affected the bi-allelic mutation rate and mutation efficiency of blastocysts derived from electroporated embryos. Microinjection significantly decreased the cleavage rates in each embryonic stage and blastocyst formation rates in 2-cell stage embryos compared with electroporation (p < 0.05). However, the bi-allelic mutation rate and mutation efficiency of blastocysts from the 1-cell stage embryos edited using microinjection were significantly higher (p < 0.05) than those of blastocysts from the 2-cell stage embryos edited by both methods. These results indicate that the gene editing method and embryonic stage for gene editing may affect the genotype and mutation efficiency of the resulting embryos.
将 CRISPR/Cas9 系统的细胞质微注射和电穿孔导入受精卵用于产生基因修饰猪。然而,这些方法会在胚胎中产生嵌合突变。本研究评估了基因编辑方法和胚胎阶段对猪胚胎基因编辑效率的影响。
首先,我们设计了 5 种针对 B4GALNT2 基因的向导 RNA(gRNA),并通过电穿孔将每种 gRNA 与 Cas9 蛋白导入受精卵来评估突变效率。接下来,通过微注射或电穿孔将优化后的 gRNA 与 Cas9 蛋白导入 1 细胞和 2 细胞期胚胎。gRNA 的序列影响电穿孔胚胎来源的囊胚的双等位基因突变率和突变效率。与电穿孔相比,微注射显著降低了每个胚胎阶段的分裂率和 2 细胞期胚胎的囊胚形成率(p<0.05)。然而,与两种方法编辑的 2 细胞期胚胎的囊胚相比,使用微注射编辑的 1 细胞期胚胎的双等位基因突变率和突变效率显著更高(p<0.05)。这些结果表明,基因编辑方法和基因编辑的胚胎阶段可能会影响产生的胚胎的基因型和突变效率。