• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

神经外科与骨科手术:谁能更好地使用微创脊柱技术?

Neurosurgery versus orthopedic surgery: Who has better access to minimally invasive spinal technology?

作者信息

Guiroy Alfredo José, Duarte Matias Pereira, Cabrera Juan Pablo, Coombes Nicolás, Gagliardi Martin, Gotfryd Alberto, Carazzo Charles, Taboada Nestor, Falavigna Asdrubal

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Hospital Español, Mendoza, Argentina.

Department of Orthopedic, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

出版信息

Surg Neurol Int. 2020 Nov 11;11:385. doi: 10.25259/SNI_600_2020. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.25259/SNI_600_2020
PMID:33408919
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7771484/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Our aim was to evaluate differences in neurosurgeons versus orthopedists access to technologies needed to perform minimally invasive spine surgeries (MISS) in Latin America.

METHODS

We sent a survey to members of AO Spine Latin America (January 2020), and assessed the following variables; nationality, level of hospital (primary, secondary, and tertiary), number of spinal operations performed per year, spinal pathologies addressed, the number of minimally invasive spine operations performed/year, and differences in access to MISS spinal technology between neurosurgeons and orthopedists.

RESULTS

Responses were returned from 306 (25.6) members of AO Spine Latin America representing 20 different countries; 57.8% of respondents were orthopedic surgeons and 42.4% had over 10 years of experience. Although both specialties reported a lack of access to most of the technologies, the main difference between the two was greater utilization/access of neurosurgeons to operating microscope (e.g., 84% of the neurosurgeons vs. 39% of orthopedic spine surgeons).

CONCLUSION

Although both specialties have limited access to MISS spinal technologies, orthopedic spine surgeons reported significantly lower access to operating microscopes versus neurosurgeons ( < 0.01).

摘要

背景

我们的目的是评估拉丁美洲神经外科医生与骨科医生在获取进行微创脊柱手术(MISS)所需技术方面的差异。

方法

我们向拉丁美洲AO脊柱协会成员发送了一份调查问卷(2020年1月),并评估了以下变量:国籍、医院级别(初级、二级和三级)、每年进行的脊柱手术数量、处理的脊柱病变、每年进行的微创脊柱手术数量,以及神经外科医生和骨科医生在获取MISS脊柱技术方面的差异。

结果

来自拉丁美洲AO脊柱协会的306名(25.6%)成员回复了问卷,他们代表20个不同国家;57.8%的受访者为骨科医生,42.4%有超过10年的经验。尽管两个专业都报告难以获取大多数技术,但两者之间的主要差异在于神经外科医生对手术显微镜的利用率/获取率更高(例如,84%的神经外科医生使用,而骨科脊柱外科医生为39%)。

结论

尽管两个专业在获取MISS脊柱技术方面都有限,但骨科脊柱外科医生报告称,与神经外科医生相比,他们使用手术显微镜的机会显著更低(<0.01)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b98a/7771484/0c8fd8015c50/SNI-11-385-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b98a/7771484/36f83c27c824/SNI-11-385-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b98a/7771484/7e1acb044e1b/SNI-11-385-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b98a/7771484/0c8fd8015c50/SNI-11-385-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b98a/7771484/36f83c27c824/SNI-11-385-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b98a/7771484/7e1acb044e1b/SNI-11-385-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b98a/7771484/0c8fd8015c50/SNI-11-385-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Neurosurgery versus orthopedic surgery: Who has better access to minimally invasive spinal technology?神经外科与骨科手术:谁能更好地使用微创脊柱技术?
Surg Neurol Int. 2020 Nov 11;11:385. doi: 10.25259/SNI_600_2020. eCollection 2020.
2
Access to Technology and Education for the Development of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery Techniques in Latin America.获取技术和教育资源,以推动拉丁美洲微创脊柱外科技术的发展。
World Neurosurg. 2020 Oct;142:e203-e209. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.06.174. Epub 2020 Jun 27.
3
Barriers of neurophysiology monitoring in spine surgery: Latin America experience.脊柱手术中神经生理学监测的障碍:拉丁美洲的经验
Surg Neurol Int. 2020 May 30;11:130. doi: 10.25259/SNI_44_2020. eCollection 2020.
4
Does specialty matter? A survey on 176 Italian neurosurgeons and orthopedic spine surgeons confirms similar competency for common spinal conditions and supports multidisciplinary teams in comprehensive and complex spinal care.专业是否重要?对 176 名意大利神经外科医生和骨科脊柱外科医生的调查证实,他们在常见脊柱疾病方面具有相似的能力,并支持多学科团队提供全面和复杂的脊柱护理。
Spine J. 2018 Aug;18(8):1498-1503. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.10.004. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
5
Review of Physician Referrals to Orthopedic Spine versus Neurosurgery.对骨科脊柱医师转诊至骨科与神经外科的回顾。
Clin Orthop Surg. 2020 Mar;12(1):55-59. doi: 10.4055/cios.2020.12.1.55. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
6
Training and Credentialing Standards for Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery Techniques: Results of a Survey.微创脊柱手术技术的培训和认证标准:调查结果。
Pain Physician. 2023 Jan;26(1):29-37.
7
The First Years of Practice of Young Spine Surgeons in Latin America.拉丁美洲青年脊柱外科医生的早期实践。
World Neurosurg. 2024 Oct;190:e450-e458. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.07.156. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
8
Workforce Trends in Spinal Surgery: Geographic Distribution and Primary Specialty Characteristics from 2012 to 2017.脊柱外科劳动力趋势:2012年至2017年的地理分布和主要专业特征
World Neurosurg. 2021 Dec;156:e392-e397. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.09.073. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
9
Regional variations in acceptance, and utilization of minimally invasive spinal surgery techniques among spine surgeons: results of a global survey.脊柱外科医生对微创脊柱手术技术的接受程度和应用情况的地区差异:一项全球调查结果
J Spine Surg. 2020 Jan;6(Suppl 1):S260-S274. doi: 10.21037/jss.2019.09.31.
10
Knowledge and Attitude Regarding Radiation Exposure Among Spine Surgeons in Latin America.拉丁美洲脊柱外科医生对辐射暴露的认知与态度
World Neurosurg. 2018 Apr;112:e823-e829. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.01.166. Epub 2018 Feb 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Evolving Paradigms in Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Learning Curves in Minimally Invasive Spine Techniques.脊柱外科不断演变的范式:微创脊柱技术学习曲线的系统评价
Neurospine. 2024 Dec;21(4):1251-1275. doi: 10.14245/ns.2448838.419. Epub 2024 Dec 31.
2
Prevalence of spine surgery navigation techniques and availability in Africa: A cross-sectional study.非洲脊柱手术导航技术的普及率及可及性:一项横断面研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Jul 29;68:102637. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102637. eCollection 2021 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
Access to Technology and Education for the Development of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery Techniques in Latin America.获取技术和教育资源,以推动拉丁美洲微创脊柱外科技术的发展。
World Neurosurg. 2020 Oct;142:e203-e209. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.06.174. Epub 2020 Jun 27.
2
A Systematic Review of Complications Following Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery Including Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.包括经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术在内的微创脊柱手术后并发症的系统评价。
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2019 Jul 13;12(3):328-339. doi: 10.1007/s12178-019-09574-2.
3
A 1-Year Cost Analysis of Spinal Surgical Procedures in Spain: Neurosurgeons Versus Orthopedic Surgeons.
西班牙脊柱外科手术的1年成本分析:神经外科医生与骨科医生的对比
Neurospine. 2019 Jun;16(2):354-359. doi: 10.14245/ns.1836170.085. Epub 2019 Jun 30.
4
Does specialty matter? A survey on 176 Italian neurosurgeons and orthopedic spine surgeons confirms similar competency for common spinal conditions and supports multidisciplinary teams in comprehensive and complex spinal care.专业是否重要?对 176 名意大利神经外科医生和骨科脊柱外科医生的调查证实,他们在常见脊柱疾病方面具有相似的能力,并支持多学科团队提供全面和复杂的脊柱护理。
Spine J. 2018 Aug;18(8):1498-1503. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.10.004. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
5
Extreme lateral lumbar interbody fusion: Do the cons outweigh the pros?极外侧腰椎椎间融合术:弊端是否大于益处?
Surg Neurol Int. 2016 Sep 22;7(Suppl 25):S692-S700. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.191079. eCollection 2016.