• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

即将发生骨折的风险因素:FRISBEE 队列的子研究。

Risk factors for imminent fractures: a substudy of the FRISBEE cohort.

机构信息

Department of Endocrinology, CHU Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Place van Gehuchten 4, Laeken, 1020, Brussels, Belgium.

Data Centre, Inst. J. Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Osteoporos Int. 2021 Jun;32(6):1093-1101. doi: 10.1007/s00198-020-05772-8. Epub 2021 Jan 7.

DOI:10.1007/s00198-020-05772-8
PMID:33411010
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Multiple factors increase the risk of an imminent fracture, including a recent fracture, older age, osteoporosis, comorbidities, and the fracture site. These findings could be a first step in the development of a model to predict an imminent fracture and select patients most at need of immediate treatment.

INTRODUCTION

The risk of a recurrent fragility fracture is maximal during the first 2 years following an incident fracture. In this prospective cohort study, we looked at the incidence of recurrent fractures within 2 years after a first incident fracture and we assessed independent clinical risk factors (CRFs) increasing this imminent fracture risk.

METHODS

A total of 3560 postmenopausal women recruited from 2007 to 2013 were surveyed yearly for the occurrence of fragility fractures. We identified patients who sustained a fracture during the first 2 years following a first incident fragility fracture. We quantified the risk of a new fracture and assessed independent CRFs, associated with an imminent fracture at various sites.

RESULTS

A recent fracture was a significant CRF for an imminent fracture (OR (95% CI): 3.7 (2.4-5.7) [p < 0.0001]). The incidence of an imminent fracture was higher in subjects above 80 years (p < 0.001). Other CRFs highly predictive in a multivariate analysis were osteoporosis diagnosis (p < 0.01), a central fracture as the index fracture (p < 0.01), and the presence of comorbidities (p < 0.05), with likelihood ratios of 1.9, 1.9, and 2.2, respectively. An imminent fracture was better predicted by a central fracture (p < 0.01) than by a major osteoporotic fracture. The hazard ratio was the highest for a central fracture.

CONCLUSION

In patients with a recent fracture, older age, osteoporosis, comorbidities, and fracture site were associated with an imminent fracture risk. These findings could be a first step in the development of a model to predict an imminent fracture and select patients most at need of immediate and most appropriate treatment.

摘要

目的

多种因素会增加骨折风险,包括近期骨折、年龄较大、骨质疏松症、合并症和骨折部位。这些发现可能是开发一种预测即将发生骨折并选择最需要立即治疗的患者的模型的第一步。

方法

本前瞻性队列研究共纳入 3560 名 2007 年至 2013 年招募的绝经后女性,每年调查脆性骨折的发生情况。我们确定了在首次脆性骨折后 2 年内发生骨折的患者。我们量化了新发骨折的风险,并评估了与各部位即将发生骨折相关的独立临床危险因素(CRFs)。

结果

近期骨折是即将发生骨折的显著 CRF(OR(95%CI):3.7(2.4-5.7)[p<0.0001])。80 岁以上患者发生即将发生骨折的风险更高(p<0.001)。多变量分析中高度预测的其他 CRFs 包括骨质疏松症诊断(p<0.01)、以中心骨折为索引骨折(p<0.01)和合并症存在(p<0.05),其似然比分别为 1.9、1.9 和 2.2。即将发生骨折的中心骨折(p<0.01)比主要骨质疏松性骨折更好预测。中心骨折的风险比最高。

结论

在近期有骨折的患者中,年龄较大、骨质疏松症、合并症和骨折部位与即将发生骨折的风险相关。这些发现可能是开发一种预测即将发生骨折并选择最需要立即和最合适治疗的患者的模型的第一步。

相似文献

1
Risk factors for imminent fractures: a substudy of the FRISBEE cohort.即将发生骨折的风险因素:FRISBEE 队列的子研究。
Osteoporos Int. 2021 Jun;32(6):1093-1101. doi: 10.1007/s00198-020-05772-8. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
2
Prediction of an Imminent Fracture After an Index Fracture - Models Derived From the Frisbee Cohort.预测指数骨折后的骨折风险:来自 Frisbee 队列的模型。
J Bone Miner Res. 2022 Jan;37(1):59-67. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.4432. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
3
Risk factors predicting the 'time to first fracture' and its association with imminent fractures: a substudy of the FRISBEE cohort.预测“首次骨折时间”的风险因素及其与即将发生的骨折的关系:FRISBEE 队列的子研究。
Arch Osteoporos. 2023 Jun 28;18(1):88. doi: 10.1007/s11657-023-01296-w.
4
Risk of imminent fracture following a previous fracture in a Swedish database study.在一项瑞典数据库研究中,既往骨折后发生骨折的风险。
Osteoporos Int. 2019 Mar;30(3):601-609. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-04852-8. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
5
Distribution of clinical risk factors for fracture in a Brussels cohort of postmenopausal women: The FRISBEE study and comparison with other major cohort studies.布鲁塞尔绝经后女性骨折临床危险因素分布:FRISBEE 研究及其与其他主要队列研究的比较。
Maturitas. 2017 Dec;106:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2017.08.010. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
6
Fragility fractures and imminent fracture risk in Hong Kong: one of the cities with longest life expectancies.香港的脆性骨折和即将发生的骨折风险:预期寿命最长的城市之一。
Arch Osteoporos. 2019 Oct 29;14(1):104. doi: 10.1007/s11657-019-0648-4.
7
The imminent risk of a fracture-existing worldwide data: a systematic review and meta-analysis.存在于全球范围内的数据:骨折的即将发生的风险——一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
Osteoporos Int. 2022 Dec;33(12):2453-2466. doi: 10.1007/s00198-022-06473-0. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
8
Osteoporotic fractures and subsequent fractures: imminent fracture risk from an analysis of German real-world claims data.骨质疏松性骨折和随后的骨折:从德国真实世界理赔数据分析得出的即将发生的骨折风险。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021 Sep;304(3):703-712. doi: 10.1007/s00404-021-06123-6. Epub 2021 Jul 11.
9
Risk of major osteoporotic fracture after first, second and third fracture in Swedish women aged 50 years and older.50 岁及以上瑞典女性首次、第二次和第三次骨折后的主要骨质疏松性骨折风险。
Bone. 2020 May;134:115286. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2020.115286. Epub 2020 Feb 15.
10
Does the Prediction Accuracy of Osteoporotic Fractures by BMD and Clinical Risk Factors Vary With Fracture Site?基于骨密度和临床风险因素对骨质疏松性骨折的预测准确性是否因骨折部位而异?
JBMR Plus. 2019 Oct 29;3(12):e10238. doi: 10.1002/jbm4.10238. eCollection 2019 Dec.

引用本文的文献

1
A multivariate analysis of the impact of HIV infection on the risk of osteoporosis based on the NHANES database.基于美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)数据库对HIV感染对骨质疏松风险影响的多变量分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Sep 5;104(36):e44459. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000044459.
2
External validation of FRISBEE 2-year and 5-year fracture prediction models in a fracture liaison service cohort.骨折联络服务队列中FRISBEE 2年和5年骨折预测模型的外部验证
Arch Osteoporos. 2025 Aug 2;20(1):107. doi: 10.1007/s11657-025-01516-5.
3
Similarities in distribution pattern between acute multiple osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures and vertebral fractures cascades.

本文引用的文献

1
Adjusting conventional FRAX estimates of fracture probability according to the recency of sentinel fractures.根据最近发生的哨兵骨折调整常规 FRAX 骨折概率估算。
Osteoporos Int. 2020 Oct;31(10):1817-1828. doi: 10.1007/s00198-020-05517-7. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
2
Efficacy of teriparatide compared with risedronate on FRAX-defined major osteoporotic fractures: results of the VERO clinical trial.特立帕肽与利塞膦酸盐对 FRACTURE 定义的主要骨质疏松性骨折疗效的比较:VERO 临床试验结果。
Osteoporos Int. 2020 Oct;31(10):1935-1942. doi: 10.1007/s00198-020-05463-4. Epub 2020 May 30.
3
Underevaluation of fractures by self-report: an analysis from the FRISBEE cohort.
急性多发性骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折与椎体骨折链在分布模式上的相似性。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Dec 19;19(1):844. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05337-z.
4
Fracture severity dependence of bone and muscle performance in patients following single or multiple vertebral fractures.单发或多发椎体骨折患者骨折严重程度对骨和肌肉性能的影响。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Nov 6;15:1423650. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1423650. eCollection 2024.
5
The "Can Do, Do Do" Framework Applied to Assess the Association between Physical Capacity, Physical Activity and Prospective Falls, Subsequent Fractures, and Mortality in Patients Visiting the Fracture Liaison Service.应用“能做,就做”框架评估骨折联络服务门诊患者的身体能力、身体活动与预期跌倒、随后骨折及死亡率之间的关联。
J Pers Med. 2024 Mar 23;14(4):337. doi: 10.3390/jpm14040337.
6
Opportunistic Identification of Vertebral Compression Fractures on CT Scans of the Chest and Abdomen, Using an AI Algorithm, in a Real-Life Setting.利用人工智能算法在真实环境中对胸部和腹部 CT 扫描进行椎体压缩性骨折的机会性识别。
Calcif Tissue Int. 2024 May;114(5):468-479. doi: 10.1007/s00223-024-01196-2. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
7
Osteoporosis: Molecular Pathology, Diagnostics, and Therapeutics.骨质疏松症:分子病理学、诊断与治疗
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Sep 26;24(19):14583. doi: 10.3390/ijms241914583.
8
Osteoporosis: Spotlight on current approaches to pharmacological treatment.骨质疏松症:聚焦当前药物治疗方法
Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2023 May 15;69(2):140-152. doi: 10.5606/tftrd.2023.13054. eCollection 2023 Jun.
9
Risk factors predicting the 'time to first fracture' and its association with imminent fractures: a substudy of the FRISBEE cohort.预测“首次骨折时间”的风险因素及其与即将发生的骨折的关系:FRISBEE 队列的子研究。
Arch Osteoporos. 2023 Jun 28;18(1):88. doi: 10.1007/s11657-023-01296-w.
10
Selection for treatment of patients at high risk of fracture by the short versus long term prediction models - data from the Belgian FRISBEE cohort.选择使用短期预测模型或长期预测模型治疗骨折高风险患者 - 来自比利时 FRISBEE 队列的数据。
Osteoporos Int. 2023 Jun;34(6):1119-1125. doi: 10.1007/s00198-023-06737-3. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
自我报告中骨折的低估:来自 FRISBEE 队列的分析。
Arch Osteoporos. 2020 Apr 22;15(1):61. doi: 10.1007/s11657-020-00739-y.
4
Osteoporosis treatment gap in a prospective cohort of volunteer women.志愿者女性前瞻性队列中的骨质疏松治疗差距。
Osteoporos Int. 2020 Jul;31(7):1377-1382. doi: 10.1007/s00198-020-05339-7. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
5
A decade of FRAX: how has it changed the management of osteoporosis?十年 FRAX:它如何改变了骨质疏松症的管理?
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2020 Feb;32(2):187-196. doi: 10.1007/s40520-019-01432-y. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
6
Postfracture Risk Assessment: Target the Centrally Sited Fractures First! A Substudy of NoFRACT.骨折后风险评估:首先针对位于身体中心部位的骨折!NoFRACT研究的一项子研究。
J Bone Miner Res. 2020 Apr;35(4):827-828. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3960. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
7
History of Previous Fracture and Imminent Fracture Risk in Swedish Women Aged 55 to 90 Years Presenting With a Fragility Fracture.瑞典55至90岁因脆性骨折就诊的女性既往骨折史及近期骨折风险
J Bone Miner Res. 2020 May;35(5):861-868. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3953. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
8
Does the Prediction Accuracy of Osteoporotic Fractures by BMD and Clinical Risk Factors Vary With Fracture Site?基于骨密度和临床风险因素对骨质疏松性骨折的预测准确性是否因骨折部位而异?
JBMR Plus. 2019 Oct 29;3(12):e10238. doi: 10.1002/jbm4.10238. eCollection 2019 Dec.
9
Algorithm for the management of patients at low, high and very high risk of osteoporotic fractures.骨质疏松性骨折低、高和极高风险患者的管理算法。
Osteoporos Int. 2020 Jan;31(1):1-12. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-05176-3. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
10
Post-fracture Risk Assessment: Target the Centrally Sited Fractures First! A Substudy of NoFRACT.骨折后风险评估:首先针对中央部位骨折!NoFRACT 的一项子研究。
J Bone Miner Res. 2019 Nov;34(11):2036-2044. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3827. Epub 2019 Aug 16.