Department of Animal Science, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2021 Jan 7;53(1):85. doi: 10.1007/s11250-020-02531-z.
The objective was to evaluate the use of wet brewery residue (WBR) silage additives on carcass characteristics and sheep meat quality. Thirty-two Santa Inês male sheep uncastrated with initial body weight of 22.61 ± 7.2 kg were allocated to a completely randomized design with four treatments: (1) WBR silage without additive (WBRS), (2) WBR silage with milled corn (WBRS + MC), (3) WBR silage with wheat bran (WBRS + WB), and (4) WBR silage with cassava flour (WBRS + CF) and eight replicates. WBRS + WB resulted in lower cold carcass weight than WBRS + CF; however, this reduction was not sufficient to alter the carcass commercial yield or loin-eye area. The leg cut of animals fed WBRS + WB showed less value than those animals fed with WBRS + CS. The meat lightness of WBRS was higher that of WBRS + MC, WBRS + WB, and WBRS + CF. The cooking loss for WBRS + WB was less than those animals fed with WBRS + CS. However, meat protein, meat cholesterol, and shear force were similar among treatments (17.69%, 42.46 mg/100 g of meat, and 2.48 kgf/cm, respectively). The use of additives in wet brewery residue silage does not improve carcass characteristics or the quality of sheep meat, and it is therefore recommended to use WBR silage without additives.
本研究旨在评估湿啤酒糟(WBR)青贮添加剂对胴体特征和羊肉品质的影响。32 只初始体重为 22.61±7.2kg 的未去势雄性 Santa Inês 绵羊被随机分为 4 个处理组,每个处理组 8 个重复:(1)无添加剂的 WBR 青贮(WBRS),(2)添加玉米粉的 WBR 青贮(WBRS+MC),(3)添加麦麸的 WBR 青贮(WBRS+WB),和(4)添加木薯粉的 WBR 青贮(WBRS+CF)。与 WBRS+CF 相比,WBRS+WB 的冷胴体重较低,但这种降低不足以改变胴体商业产量或腰眼面积。饲喂 WBRS+WB 的羊的腿部切割值低于饲喂 WBRS+CS 的羊。与 WBRS+MC、WBRS+WB 和 WBRS+CF 相比,WBRS 的肉色亮度较高。WBRS+WB 的蒸煮损失小于饲喂 WBRS+CS 的羊。然而,肉蛋白、肉胆固醇和剪切力在处理组之间相似(分别为 17.69%、42.46mg/100g 肉和 2.48kgf/cm)。在湿啤酒糟青贮中使用添加剂不能改善胴体特征或羊肉品质,因此建议使用无添加剂的 WBR 青贮。