• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用电子即时评估技术研究伴发惊恐障碍的肠易激综合征的症状网络动力学:依西酞普兰与安慰剂的随机对照试验。

Symptom-network dynamics in irritable bowel syndrome with comorbid panic disorder using electronic momentary assessment: A randomized controlled trial of escitalopram vs. placebo.

机构信息

Faculty of Health, Medicine & Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, School of Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

J Psychosom Res. 2021 Feb;141:110351. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.110351. Epub 2020 Dec 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.110351
PMID:33412422
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Momentary ecological assessment indicated alleviated abdominal pain in escitalopram treatment of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) with comorbid panic disorder. Hitherto, little is known about symptom formation, i.e., how psychological impact physical symptoms, and vice versa, and about the effect of SSRI-treatment on symptom formation.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate how psychological and somatic symptoms co-vary over time in IBS patients with comorbid panic disorder and how they are affected by escitalopram treatment.

METHODS

Experience sampling data from 14 IBS patients with panic disorder were obtained from a single-centre, double-blind, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial on escitalopram versus placebo. At baseline, after three and six months, multilevel time-lagged linear regression analysis was used to construct symptom networks. Network connections represented coefficients between various affect and gastrointestinal items.

RESULTS

Connectivity increased up to 3 months in both groups. Between 3 and 6 months, connectivity decreased for placebo and further increased in the escitalopram group. Additionally, a steep increase in node strength for negative affect nodes was observed in the escitalopram network and the opposite for positive affect nodes. Over time, group symptom networks became increasingly different from each other. Anxious-anxious and enthusiastic-relaxed became significantly different between groups at 6 months. The connection that changed significantly in all analyses was anxious-anxious.

CONCLUSIONS

Escitalopram treatment was associated with changes in the symptom networks in IBS patients with panic disorder. While mood and physical symptoms improve over time, mainly connectivity between mood nodes changed, possibly pointing towards a healthier emotion regulation resulting in alleviation of physical symptoms.

摘要

简介

瞬间生态学评估表明,在伴有惊恐障碍的肠易激综合征(IBS)中,艾司西酞普兰治疗可缓解腹痛。迄今为止,人们对症状的形成知之甚少,即心理影响身体症状的方式,反之亦然,以及 SSRI 治疗对症状形成的影响。

目的

研究伴有惊恐障碍的 IBS 患者的心理和躯体症状如何随时间变化,以及艾司西酞普兰治疗如何影响这些症状。

方法

从一项关于艾司西酞普兰与安慰剂治疗的单中心、双盲、平行组、随机对照试验中获得了 14 例伴有惊恐障碍的 IBS 患者的经验抽样数据。在基线、治疗 3 个月和 6 个月时,采用多层次时间滞后线性回归分析构建症状网络。网络连接代表了各种情感和胃肠道项目之间的系数。

结果

两组的连接性在 3 个月内增加。在 3 至 6 个月期间,安慰剂组的连接性下降,而艾司西酞普兰组的连接性进一步增加。此外,在艾司西酞普兰网络中观察到负性情绪节点的节点强度急剧增加,而正性情绪节点的节点强度则相反。随着时间的推移,两组的症状网络变得越来越不同。在 6 个月时,焦虑-焦虑和热情-放松两组之间变得明显不同。在所有分析中变化显著的连接是焦虑-焦虑。

结论

艾司西酞普兰治疗与惊恐障碍伴发 IBS 患者的症状网络变化有关。随着时间的推移,情绪和身体症状有所改善,主要是情绪节点之间的连接性发生了变化,这可能表明情绪调节更为健康,从而减轻了身体症状。

相似文献

1
Symptom-network dynamics in irritable bowel syndrome with comorbid panic disorder using electronic momentary assessment: A randomized controlled trial of escitalopram vs. placebo.使用电子即时评估技术研究伴发惊恐障碍的肠易激综合征的症状网络动力学:依西酞普兰与安慰剂的随机对照试验。
J Psychosom Res. 2021 Feb;141:110351. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.110351. Epub 2020 Dec 24.
2
The Experience Sampling Method-Evaluation of treatment effect of escitalopram in IBS with comorbid panic disorder.经验采样法-评价艾司西酞普兰治疗伴发惊恐障碍的 IBS 患者的疗效。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2019 Jan;31(1):e13515. doi: 10.1111/nmo.13515. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
3
Network approach of mood and functional gastrointestinal symptom dynamics in relation to childhood trauma in patients with irritable bowel syndrome and comorbid panic disorder.网络方法研究情绪和功能性胃肠症状动力学与儿童期创伤的关系在伴有惊恐障碍的肠易激综合征患者中。
J Psychosom Res. 2020 Dec;139:110261. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.110261. Epub 2020 Oct 2.
4
[Efficacy and tolerability of escitalopram in anxiety disorders: a review].艾司西酞普兰治疗焦虑症的疗效与耐受性:综述
Encephale. 2008 Sep;34(4):400-8. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2008.04.004. Epub 2008 Aug 15.
5
Escitalopram in the treatment of panic disorder: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.艾司西酞普兰治疗惊恐障碍:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2003 Nov;64(11):1322-7. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v64n1107.
6
A controlled crossover study of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor citalopram in irritable bowel syndrome.一项关于选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂西酞普兰治疗肠易激综合征的对照交叉研究。
Gut. 2006 Aug;55(8):1095-103. doi: 10.1136/gut.2005.077503. Epub 2006 Jan 9.
7
Escitalopram : a review of its use in the management of major depressive and anxiety disorders.艾司西酞普兰:其在重度抑郁和焦虑症管理中的应用综述
CNS Drugs. 2003;17(5):343-62. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200317050-00004.
8
Improvement of quality of life in panic disorder with escitalopram, citalopram, or placebo.艾司西酞普兰、西酞普兰或安慰剂对惊恐障碍患者生活质量的改善作用。
Pharmacopsychiatry. 2007 Jul;40(4):152-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-984398.
9
Effects of escitalopram on anxiety and respiratory responses to carbon dioxide inhalation in subjects at high risk for panic disorder: a placebo-controlled, crossover study.艾司西酞普兰对惊恐障碍高危受试者焦虑及吸入二氧化碳后呼吸反应的影响:一项安慰剂对照交叉研究。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2009 Apr;29(2):174-8. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e31819a8d96.
10
The selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor escitalopram modulates the panic response to cholecystokinin tetrapeptide in healthy men depending on 5-HTTLPR genotype.选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂艾司西酞普兰根据5-羟色胺转运体基因连锁多态性区域(5-HTTLPR)基因型,调节健康男性对胆囊收缩素四肽的惊恐反应。
J Psychiatr Res. 2009 Mar;43(6):642-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2008.09.001. Epub 2008 Oct 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Electroconvulsive therapy modulates the interplay between depressive symptoms in difficult-to-treat depression: A longitudinal network analysis.电休克治疗对难治性抑郁症患者抑郁症状之间的相互作用具有调节作用:一项纵向网络分析。
Eur Psychiatry. 2025 Jun 16;68(1):e84. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.10052.
2
Antidepressants in irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.抗抑郁药治疗肠易激综合征:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Ann Gastroenterol. 2025 May-Jun;38(3):284-293. doi: 10.20524/aog.2025.0962. Epub 2025 Apr 23.
3
Results From a Psychometric Validation Study: Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome Report Higher Symptom Burden Using End-of-Day Vs Real-Time Assessment.
一项心理测量学验证研究的结果:肠易激综合征患者使用日终评估与实时评估报告的症状负担更高。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2025 May 1;120(5):1098-1107. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000003091. Epub 2024 Sep 23.
4
Implications of the Network Theory for the Treatment of Mental Disorders: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.网络理论对精神障碍治疗的启示:一项随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2023 Nov 1;80(11):1160-1168. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2023.2823.
5
Serum BDNF levels and state anxiety are associated with somatic symptoms in patients with panic disorder.惊恐障碍患者的血清脑源性神经营养因子水平和状态焦虑与躯体症状相关。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jul 18;14:1168771. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1168771. eCollection 2023.
6
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药治疗成人慢性疼痛的疼痛管理:一项网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 10;5(5):CD014682. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014682.pub2.
7
Real-time Symptom Assessment in Patients With Endometriosis: Psychometric Evaluation of an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measure, Based on the Experience Sampling Method.子宫内膜异位症患者的实时症状评估:基于经验抽样法的电子患者报告结局指标的心理测量学评价
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Mar 3;7:e29480. doi: 10.2196/29480.
8
Anxiety and depression in small fiber neuropathy.小纤维神经病中的焦虑和抑郁。
J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2022 Dec;27(4):291-301. doi: 10.1111/jns.12514. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
9
A Systematic Review on the Efficacy and Safety of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors in Gastrointestinal Motility Disorders: More Control, Less Risk.选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂在胃肠动力障碍中的疗效与安全性的系统评价:更多控制,更低风险
Cureus. 2022 Aug 4;14(8):e27691. doi: 10.7759/cureus.27691. eCollection 2022 Aug.
10
Auditing the research practices and statistical analyses of the group-level temporal network approach to psychological constructs: A systematic scoping review.对心理构念的群体层面时间网络方法的研究实践与统计分析进行审计:一项系统的范围综述。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Feb;55(2):767-787. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01839-y. Epub 2022 Apr 25.