Department of Anesthesiology, Hamamatsu Rosai Hospital, Japan Organization of Occupational Health and Safety, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Department of Anesthesiology, Hamamatsu Rosai Hospital, Japan Organization of Occupational Health and Safety, Hamamatsu, Japan.
J Surg Res. 2021 May;261:43-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.12.008. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
Monitoring of decrease in fibrinogen levels with surgical blood loss is crucial for timely transfusion of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) to avoid coagulopathic bleeding. Here, we validated a simulation model to predict hemorrhagic reductions in fibrinogen levels during major noncardiac surgery.
We retrospectively performed exponential regression analysis of intraoperative blood loss and fibrinogen levels to develop a simulation model in the initial 50 patients and applied the model to another 59 patients to compare the measured and simulated fibrinogen levels. We examined the relationship between FFP transfusion and the measured fibrinogen levels or blood loss. The fibrinogen trigger level of FFP transfusion was below 130 mg/dL, although the decision of a perioperative blood transfusion was at the discretion of the anesthesiologists and surgeons.
Application of the simulation model based on the initial 50 patients to another 59 patients showed no difference between the measured and estimated fibrinogen levels (189 ± 61 versus 186 ± 62, P = 0.60, mean difference: -2.28, limits of agreement: -69.42 to 64.84). The estimated fibrinogen level (mg/dL) = preoperative fibrinogen × exp (-1.90 × [blood loss/estimated circulation volume]), in which the estimated circulation volume = (70 [mL/kg] × body weight [kg]). FFP transfusion was significantly related to the measured fibrinogen level (cutoff: 145; 95% confidence intervals: 124-168; P = 0.0003) but not blood loss (P = 0.12).
Fibrinogen level simulation predicted a hemorrhagic fibrinogen decline, thereby guiding FFP transfusion during active surgical bleeding. Further studies on the usefulness of fibrinogen level simulation are warranted.
监测手术失血过程中纤维蛋白原水平的下降对于及时输注新鲜冷冻血浆(FFP)以避免出血性凝血功能障碍至关重要。在此,我们验证了一种预测非心脏大手术期间出血性纤维蛋白原水平下降的模拟模型。
我们对 50 例患者的术中失血量和纤维蛋白原水平进行指数回归分析,以建立模拟模型,并将模型应用于另外 59 例患者,比较测量值和模拟值的纤维蛋白原水平。我们检查了 FFP 输注与测量纤维蛋白原水平或失血之间的关系。FFP 输注的纤维蛋白原触发水平低于 130mg/dL,尽管围手术期输血的决定由麻醉师和外科医生决定。
将基于初始 50 例患者的模拟模型应用于另外 59 例患者,测量值和估计值的纤维蛋白原水平之间无差异(189±61 与 186±62,P=0.60,平均差异:-2.28,一致性界限:-69.42 至 64.84)。估计的纤维蛋白原水平(mg/dL)=术前纤维蛋白原×exp(-1.90×[失血量/估计循环量]),其中估计的循环量=(70[mL/kg]×体重[kg])。FFP 输注与测量的纤维蛋白原水平显著相关(临界值:145;95%置信区间:124-168;P=0.0003),但与失血量无关(P=0.12)。
纤维蛋白原水平模拟预测了出血性纤维蛋白原下降,从而指导了积极手术出血期间的 FFP 输注。有必要进一步研究纤维蛋白原水平模拟的有用性。