Walter S D, Marrett L D, Mishkel N
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Am J Epidemiol. 1988 Mar;127(3):691-4. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114844.
Our analysis of response rates for community controls approached in a retrospective study of melanoma indicates that there was an 11 per cent improvement in response rate when the contact letter was changed from inviting participation in a "healthy study" with no mention of cancer to a format which explicitly explained that the study concerned cancer. This improvement was observed for all age-sex groups except younger males. The result suggest that higher response rates may be achieved in studies of cancer if fuller disclosure of the study purposes is made.
我们在一项黑色素瘤回顾性研究中对社区对照的回应率进行分析,结果表明,当联系信函从邀请参与一项未提及癌症的“健康研究”改为明确解释该研究与癌症相关的格式时,回应率提高了11%。除年轻男性外,所有年龄性别组均观察到这种改善。结果表明,如果更充分地披露研究目的,在癌症研究中可能会获得更高的回应率。