Michopoulos Spyridon, Axiaris Georgios, Baxevanis Panagiotis, Stoupaki Maria, Gkagkari Vassiliki, Leonidakis Georgios, Zampeli Evanthia, Sotiropoulou Maria, Petraki Kalliopi
Gastroenterology Department, "Alexandra" Hospital, Athens (Spyridon Michopoulos, Georgios Axiaris, Panagiotis Baxevanis, Maria Stoupaki, Vassiliki Gkagkari, Georgios Leoniakis, Evanthia Zampeli).
Pathology Department, "Alexandra" Hospital, Athens (Maria Sotiropoulou).
Ann Gastroenterol. 2021;34(1):53-60. doi: 10.20524/aog.2020.0549. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
Missed polyps during colonoscopy are considered an important factor for interval cancer appearance, especially in the ascending colon (AC). We evaluated the contribution of retroflexion to polyp and adenoma detection in the AC.
This prospective observational study included consecutive patients who underwent a complete colonoscopy between 06/2017 and 06/2018. The AC was examined in 2 phases: the first included 2 forward views from the hepatic flexure to the cecum; the second involved a retroflexion in the cecum, inspection up to the hepatic flexure and reinsertion to the cecum.
The study included 655 patients, 628 (95.88%) with successful retroflexion (mean age: 62.5±10.8 years, 332 male). Indications for colonoscopy were screening in 33.28%, follow up in 36.03%, and diagnostic assessment in 30.69%. In total, 286 polyps and 220 adenomas were detected in the AC. Phase 1 identified 119 adenomas, yielding an adenoma detection rate (ADR) in the AC of 14.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.52-16.84%) while phase 2 identified 86 additional adenomas, improving the ADR in the AC to 22.75% (95%CI 19.54-25.96%; P<0.01). Adenoma miss rate was 39.1% (86/225) and per-patient adenoma miss rate was 11.15% (73/655). Retroflexion proved beneficial mainly in the upper third of the AC (odds ratio [OR] 4.29, 95%CI 1.84-11.56; P<0.01) and for small (<5 mm) adenomas (OR 1.61, 95%CI 1.02-2.56; P=0.04). Multivariate analysis showed that age >60 years, detection of adenomas in forward views and the indication "follow up" influenced ADR during retroflexion.
Retroflexion is a simple and safe maneuver that increases the ADR in the AC and should complete a second forward view.
结肠镜检查时漏诊息肉被认为是间隔期癌症出现的一个重要因素,尤其是在升结肠(AC)。我们评估了反转技术对AC中息肉和腺瘤检测的作用。
这项前瞻性观察性研究纳入了2017年6月至2018年6月期间连续接受全结肠镜检查的患者。AC分两个阶段进行检查:第一阶段包括从肝曲到盲肠的2次直视检查;第二阶段包括在盲肠进行反转,检查至肝曲并重新插入盲肠。
该研究纳入了655例患者,628例(95.88%)成功进行了反转(平均年龄:62.5±10.8岁,男性332例)。结肠镜检查的适应证为筛查占33.28%,随访占36.03%,诊断评估占30.69%。AC中总共检测到286个息肉和220个腺瘤。第一阶段发现119个腺瘤,AC中的腺瘤检出率(ADR)为14.2%(95%置信区间[CI]11.52 - 16.84%),而第二阶段又发现86个腺瘤,使AC中的ADR提高到22.75%(95%CI 19.54 - 25.96%;P<0.01)。腺瘤漏诊率为39.1%(86/225),每位患者的腺瘤漏诊率为11.15%(73/655)。反转技术主要在AC的上三分之一部位显示出益处(优势比[OR]4.29,95%CI 1.84 - 11.56;P<0.01),对于小(<5 mm)腺瘤也有益处(OR 1.61,95%CI 1.02 - 2.56;P = 0.04)。多因素分析显示,年龄>60岁、直视检查中腺瘤的检出以及“随访”适应证会影响反转检查时的ADR。
反转技术是一种简单且安全的操作,可提高AC中的ADR,并且应在完成第二次直视检查后进行。