• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

持续性臀位与外倒转术成功率的关系。

Association of Persistent Breech Presentation With External Cephalic Version Success.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rambam Health Care Campus, and the Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Feb 1;137(2):258-262. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004231.

DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000004231
PMID:33416280
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate a possible correlation between a new variable-persistent breech presentation-and the success rate of external cephalic version (ECV).

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of ECVs performed from January 2008 through January 2019 in an Israeli tertiary care hospital. The study group included all pregnant women who underwent an ECV at or beyond 37 weeks of gestation. Persistent breech presentation was defined as persistent breech presentation during all ultrasound examinations performed between the anatomy scan at mid-pregnancy and the gestational week when ECV was attempted. Women in whom cephalic presentation was documented at least once on these ultrasound examinations were defined as not having persistent breech presentation. The primary outcome was defined as the success rate of ECV, and the secondary outcome was defined as the mode of delivery after a successful ECV.

RESULTS

We identified 1,271 women with breech presentation during the study period. They had undergone median of five (range 2-7) ultrasound examinations. External cephalic version was attempted in 684 women (53.8%), with a success rate of 61.5%. External cephalic version succeeded in 19.6% of those with persistent breech presentation (44/224) compared with 82.0% (377/460) of those without persistent breech presentation (P<.001). Ultimately, women with persistent breech presentation and successful ECV experienced a lower rate of vaginal delivery (27.3% vs 79%, P<.001), and a higher rate of instrumental (29% vs 13%, P<.001) and cesarean deliveries (43% vs 7%, P<.001) compared with the nonpersistent breech presentation group. The rate of noninstrumental vaginal delivery among women with persistent breech presentation, regardless of ECV, was 5.4%.

CONCLUSION

Women with persistent breech presentation experienced a high rate of ECV failure and a low rate of spontaneous vaginal delivery.

摘要

目的

评估一种新的可变持续性臀位分娩与外部胎儿头位倒转术(ECV)成功率之间可能存在的相关性。

方法

这是一项回顾性研究,纳入了 2008 年 1 月至 2019 年 1 月期间在以色列一家三级保健医院进行的 ECV。研究组包括所有在妊娠 37 周及以上进行 ECV 的孕妇。持续性臀位分娩的定义为中孕期的解剖扫描至尝试 ECV 的妊娠周期间所有超声检查中持续性臀位分娩。至少一次在这些超声检查中记录为头位分娩的孕妇被定义为没有持续性臀位分娩。主要结局定义为 ECV 的成功率,次要结局定义为成功 ECV 后的分娩方式。

结果

我们在研究期间确定了 1271 例臀位分娩的孕妇。她们进行了中位数为 5 次(范围 2-7 次)的超声检查。684 例孕妇(53.8%)尝试了 ECV,成功率为 61.5%。持续性臀位分娩的孕妇中 ECV 成功的比例为 19.6%(44/224),而无持续性臀位分娩的孕妇中 ECV 成功的比例为 82.0%(377/460)(P<.001)。最终,持续性臀位分娩且 ECV 成功的孕妇阴道分娩率较低(27.3%对 79%,P<.001),器械助产(29%对 13%,P<.001)和剖宫产(43%对 7%,P<.001)率较高。无论 ECV 结果如何,持续性臀位分娩的孕妇非器械性阴道分娩率为 5.4%。

结论

持续性臀位分娩的孕妇 ECV 失败率高,自然阴道分娩率低。

相似文献

1
Association of Persistent Breech Presentation With External Cephalic Version Success.持续性臀位与外倒转术成功率的关系。
Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Feb 1;137(2):258-262. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004231.
2
Value of routine ultrasound examination at 35-37 weeks' gestation in diagnosis of non-cephalic presentation.35-37 孕周常规超声检查在诊断非头位中的价值。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Feb;55(2):248-256. doi: 10.1002/uog.21902.
3
Comparison of Fetomaternal Outcome between 47 Deliveries Following Successful External Cephalic Version for Breech Presentation and 7456 Deliveries Following Spontaneous Cephalic Presentation.臀位外倒转术成功后47例分娩与头先露自然分娩7456例的母儿结局比较。
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2018;83(5):477-481. doi: 10.1159/000480013. Epub 2017 Aug 25.
4
Efficacy of a second external cephalic version (ECV) after a successful first external cephalic version with subsequent spontaneous reinversion to breech presentation: a retrospective cohort study.第一 次 外 转 术(ECV) 成 功 后 再 进 行 一 次 ECV 以 防 胎 儿 自 然 复 位 至 臀 位:回 顾 性 队 列 研 究。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021 Apr;303(4):911-916. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05819-5. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
5
Association between hospitals' cesarean delivery rates for breech presentation and their success rates for external cephalic version.医院臀位剖宫产率与其外倒转术成功率之间的关联。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022 Mar;270:156-163. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.01.007. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
6
Delivery mode and neonatal outcome after a trial of external cephalic version (ECV): a prospective trial of vaginal breech versus cephalic delivery.外倒转术(ECV)试验后的分娩方式和新生儿结局:阴道臀位与头位分娩的前瞻性试验。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013 Apr;287(4):663-8. doi: 10.1007/s00404-012-2639-1. Epub 2012 Nov 25.
7
[Impact of the external cephalic version on the obstetrical prognosis in a team with a high success rate of vaginal delivery in breech presentation].[外倒转术对臀位阴道分娩成功率高的团队中产科预后的影响]
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2016 Oct;45(8):859-865. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2016.03.007. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
8
External cephalic version at term: a cohort study of 18 years' experience.足月时经阴道外倒转术:18 年经验的队列研究。
BJOG. 2019 Mar;126(4):493-499. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15475. Epub 2018 Oct 23.
9
Successful external cephalic version is an independent factor for caesarean section during trial of labor - a matched controlled study.成功的外倒转术是试产期间剖宫产的独立因素——一项配对对照研究。
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2017 Dec;46(10):737-742. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2017.09.001. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
10
Uptake of external cephalic version for term breech presentation: an Australian population study, 2002-2012.2002-2012 年澳大利亚人群研究:足月臀位行外倒转术的情况。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Jul 26;17(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1430-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors influencing the effect of external cephalic version: a retrospective nationwide cohort analysis.影响外倒转术效果的因素:一项回顾性全国队列分析。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Oct;308(4):1127-1137. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06763-2. Epub 2022 Sep 7.