• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应用新型体力活动问卷评估慢性肾脏病患者的能量消耗。

Energy expenditure estimates in chronic kidney disease using a novel physical activity questionnaire.

机构信息

Renal Unit, Lister Hospital, Corey's Mill Lane, Stevenage, UK.

Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.

出版信息

Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2022 Feb 25;37(3):515-521. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfaa377.

DOI:10.1093/ndt/gfaa377
PMID:33416874
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Physical activity (PA) levels are low in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD), and associate with increased morbidity and mortality. Reliable tools to assess PA in CKD are scarce. We aimed to develop and validate a novel PA questionnaire for use in CKD (CKD-PAQ).

METHODS

In Phase 1, a prototype questionnaire was developed based on the validated recent PAQ (RPAQ). Structured feedback on item relevance and clarity was obtained from 40 CKD patients. In Phase 2, the questionnaire was refined in three iterations in a total of 226 CKD patients against 7-day accelerometer and RPAQ measurements. In Phase 3, the definitive CKD-PAQ was compared with RPAQ in 523 CKD patients.

RESULTS

In the final iteration of Phase 2, CKD-PAQ data were compared with accelerometer-derived and RPAQ data in 60 patients. Mean daily metabolic equivalent of task (MET) and total energy expenditure (TEE) levels were similar by all methods. Intraclass correlation coefficients showed fair (MET) and good (TEE) agreement between accelerometry and both CKD-PAQ and RPAQ. Agreement between questionnaires was excellent. The mean [standard deviation (SD)] daily MET bias was 0.035 (0.312) for CKD-PAQ and 0.018 (0.326) for RPAQ. The mean (SD) TEE bias was 91 (518) for CKD-PAQ and 44 (548) kcal for RPAQ. Limits of agreement (LOA) were wide for both parameters, with less dispersion of CKD-PAQ values. In Phase 3, agreement between questionnaires was good (MET) and excellent (TEE). Bias of CKD-PAQ-derived mean (SD) daily MET from RPAQ-derived values was 0.031 (0.193), with 95% LOA -0.346 to 0.409. Corresponding mean (SD) values for TEE were 48 (325) and -588 to 685 kcal/day. CKD-PAQ appeared to improve discrimination between low activity groups.

CONCLUSIONS

CKD-PAQ performs comparably to the RPAQ though it is shorter, easier to complete, and may better capture low-level activity and improve discrimination between low activity groups.

摘要

背景

在晚期慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者中,体力活动(PA)水平较低,与发病率和死亡率增加有关。可靠的工具来评估 CKD 中的 PA 是稀缺的。我们旨在开发和验证一种用于 CKD 的新型 PA 问卷(CKD-PAQ)。

方法

在第 1 阶段,根据经过验证的近期 PAQ(RPAQ)开发了原型问卷。从 40 名 CKD 患者那里获得了关于项目相关性和清晰度的结构化反馈。在第 2 阶段,在总共 226 名 CKD 患者中,对问卷进行了 3 次迭代,同时还对 7 天加速度计和 RPAQ 测量进行了评估。在第 3 阶段,在 523 名 CKD 患者中,将确定的 CKD-PAQ 与 RPAQ 进行了比较。

结果

在第 2 阶段的最后一次迭代中,在 60 名患者中比较了 CKD-PAQ 数据与加速度计衍生数据和 RPAQ 数据。所有方法的平均每日代谢当量任务(MET)和总能量消耗(TEE)水平相似。组内相关系数表明,加速度计与 CKD-PAQ 和 RPAQ 之间的一致性为中等(MET)和良好(TEE)。问卷之间的一致性非常好。CKD-PAQ 的平均(标准偏差(SD))每日 MET 偏差为 0.035(0.312),RPAQ 的平均(SD)为 0.018(0.326)。CKD-PAQ 的平均(SD)TEE 偏差为 91(518),RPAQ 的平均(SD)为 44(548)千卡。两个参数的 LOA 都很宽,CKD-PAQ 值的分散度较小。在第 3 阶段,问卷之间的一致性很好(MET)和非常好(TEE)。CKD-PAQ 衍生的平均(SD)每日 MET 与 RPAQ 衍生值的偏差为 0.031(0.193),95%LOA 为 -0.346 至 0.409。相应的 TEE 平均值(SD)为 48(325)和 -588 至 685 千卡/天。CKD-PAQ 似乎改善了低活动组之间的区分度。

结论

尽管 CKD-PAQ 比 RPAQ 更短、更容易完成,并且可能更好地捕获低水平活动并改善低活动组之间的区分度,但它的性能与 RPAQ 相当。

相似文献

1
Energy expenditure estimates in chronic kidney disease using a novel physical activity questionnaire.应用新型体力活动问卷评估慢性肾脏病患者的能量消耗。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2022 Feb 25;37(3):515-521. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfaa377.
2
Comparison of energy estimates in chronic kidney disease using doubly-labelled water.使用双标记水对慢性肾病患者能量估计值的比较。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2016 Feb;29(1):59-66. doi: 10.1111/jhn.12326. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
3
Simultaneous Validation of Seven Physical Activity Questionnaires Used in Japanese Cohorts for Estimating Energy Expenditure: A Doubly Labeled Water Study.同时验证七种用于估算能量消耗的日本队列体力活动问卷:双标记水研究。
J Epidemiol. 2018 Oct 5;28(10):437-442. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20170129. Epub 2018 Apr 28.
4
Comparison of total and activity energy expenditure estimates from physical activity questionnaires and doubly labelled water: a systematic review and meta-analysis.比较体力活动问卷和双标水法估计的总能量和活性能量消耗:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Nutr. 2021 May 14;125(9):983-997. doi: 10.1017/S0007114520003049. Epub 2020 Jul 28.
5
Estimating activity energy expenditure: how valid are physical activity questionnaires?估算活动能量消耗:体力活动问卷的有效性如何?
Am J Clin Nutr. 2008 Feb;87(2):279-91. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/87.2.279.
6
Validity of electronically administered Recent Physical Activity Questionnaire (RPAQ) in ten European countries.电子管理的近期身体活动问卷(RPAQ)在十个欧洲国家的有效性。
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 25;9(3):e92829. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092829. eCollection 2014.
7
Validity of the Use of a Triaxial Accelerometer and a Physical Activity Questionnaire for Estimating Total Energy Expenditure and Physical Activity Level among Elderly Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: CLEVER-DM Study.使用三轴加速度计和体力活动问卷评估 2 型糖尿病老年患者总能量消耗和体力活动水平的有效性:CLEVER-DM 研究。
Ann Nutr Metab. 2020;76(1):62-72. doi: 10.1159/000506223. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
8
Validity of a physical activity questionnaire in Shanghai.上海体力活动问卷的有效性。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010 Dec;42(12):2222-30. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181e1fcd5.
9
Estimating physical activity energy expenditure, sedentary time, and physical activity intensity by self-report in adults.利用自我报告估计成年人的体力活动能量消耗、久坐时间和体力活动强度。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2010 Jan;91(1):106-14. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.28432. Epub 2009 Nov 4.
10
Are Self-report Measures Able to Define Individuals as Physically Active or Inactive?自我报告测量方法能否将个体定义为活跃或不活跃?
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016 Feb;48(2):235-44. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000760.

引用本文的文献

1
Properties of Measurements of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Physical Activity Assessment in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review.慢性肾脏病患者报告结局测量中身体活动评估的测量属性:一项系统评价
Physiother Res Int. 2025 Jul;30(3):e70076. doi: 10.1002/pri.70076.
2
Osteosarcopenia in Chronic Kidney Disease: An Overlooked Syndrome?慢性肾脏病中的骨少肌少症:一种被忽视的综合征?
J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2025 Apr;16(2):e13787. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.13787.
3
Frailty, appendicular lean mass, osteoporosis and osteosarcopenia in peritoneal dialysis patients.
腹膜透析患者的虚弱、四肢瘦体组织、骨质疏松症和肌少骨量症。
J Nephrol. 2022 Dec;35(9):2333-2340. doi: 10.1007/s40620-022-01390-1. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
4
Characteristics of Frailty in Haemodialysis Patients.血液透析患者的衰弱特征
Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2022 May 6;8:23337214221098889. doi: 10.1177/23337214221098889. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.