Wilson G J, Rebeyka I M, Coles J G, Desrosiers A J, Dasmahapatra H K, Adler S, Feitler D A, Sherret H, Kielmanowicz S, Ikonomidis J
Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont, Canada.
Ann Thorac Surg. 1988 Feb;45(2):206-9. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)62439-3.
We assessed somatosensory evoked response (SSER) as a monitor of cerebral protection during nonpulsatile, hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). In 13 dogs under CPB, extracorporeal flow rate (EFR) thresholds for loss of SSER were determined by stepwise reduction of the EFR from 2.0 to 0.25 L/min/m2 at perfusion temperatures of 35 degrees C, 30 degrees C, 25 degrees C, and 20 degrees C. Testing began at 35 degrees C in Group 1 (N = 6) and at 20 degrees C in Group 2 (N = 7). Immediately on loss of SSER (denoted as a decrease of 80% or more in the amplitude of the somatosensory evoked potentials), EFR was restored to 2.0 L/min/m. Thresholds for loss of SSER ranged between 0.75 and 0.25 L/min/m2. SSER was always restored on return of EFR to 2.0 L/min/m2; thus loss of SSER was a reversible ischemic change. Both groups had similar threshold values at 35 degrees C, but at lower temperatures, Group 1 thresholds were significantly higher than those in Group 2. Since 35 degrees C was the first test temperature for Group 1 but the last for Group 2, EFR reduction at 35 degrees C apparently caused neurophysiological changes (depletion of cortical energy reserves), which diminished subsequent tolerance to ischemia, but EFR reduction at 20 degrees C did not. Our findings show that loss of SSER warns of reversible cerebral ischemia, and support SSER monitoring as a useful measure of cerebral function during low-flow, hypothermic CPB.
我们评估了体感诱发电位(SSER)作为非搏动性低温体外循环(CPB)期间脑保护监测指标的作用。在13只接受CPB的犬中,分别于35℃、30℃、25℃和20℃的灌注温度下,通过将体外循环血流量(EFR)从2.0逐步降至0.25L/min/m²,确定SSER消失时的EFR阈值。第1组(N = 6)在35℃开始测试,第2组(N = 7)在20℃开始测试。一旦SSER消失(体感诱发电位幅度下降80%或更多),EFR立即恢复至2.0L/min/m²。SSER消失时的阈值在0.75至0.25L/min/m²之间。当EFR恢复至2.0L/min/m²时,SSER总能恢复;因此,SSER消失是一种可逆的缺血性改变。两组在35℃时的阈值相似,但在较低温度下,第1组的阈值显著高于第2组。由于35℃是第1组的首个测试温度,却是第2组的最后一个测试温度,因此35℃时EFR的降低显然引起了神经生理变化(皮质能量储备耗竭),这降低了随后对缺血的耐受性,但20℃时EFR的降低并未产生这种影响。我们的研究结果表明,SSER消失提示可逆性脑缺血,并支持将SSER监测作为低流量低温CPB期间脑功能的一项有用指标。