Suppr超能文献

DSM-5 混合特征的患病率:荟萃分析和系统评价。

Prevalence of DSM-5 mixed features: A meta-analysis and systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Gachon University College of Medicine, Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea.

Department of Psychiatry, Gachon University College of Medicine, Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2021 Mar 1;282:203-210. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.12.149. Epub 2020 Dec 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The definition of mixed features by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) remains controversal; however, there has been no systematic review of the prevalence of DSM-5 mixed features. We conducted a meta-analysis and systematic review to examine the prevalence of DSM-5-defined mixed features in major depressive episodes (MDE) and manic/hypomanic episodes.

METHODS

We systematically searched all literature types (i.e., observational, cross-sectional, cohort, retrospective chart review, and post-hoc analysis) in electronic databases including MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Web of Science from 2013 to 2020.

RESULTS

A total of 17 studies with 20 samples were selected. The pooled prevalences of the mixed features in MDE and manic/hypomanic episodes were 11.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 7.9-16.7%) and 26.8 (95% CI = 17.0-39.5%), respectively. The prevalence of mixed features during major depressive disorder in East Asian countries was the lowest, which ranged from 0-2.2%. The subgroup analysis did not identify any influential factors for substantial heterogeneity. Most of the individual studies demonstrated moderate to high risk of bias.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the increasing attention and controversy surrounding DSM-5-defined mixed features, few studies have systematically estimated the prevalence. Future studies with appropriate design and sample sizes should measure the prevalence of mixed features during MDE and manic/hypomanic episodes.

摘要

背景

《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-5)对混合特征的定义仍存在争议;然而,目前尚无对 DSM-5 混合特征流行率的系统评价。我们进行了一项荟萃分析和系统评价,以检查重性抑郁发作(MDE)和躁狂/轻躁狂发作中 DSM-5 定义的混合特征的流行率。

方法

我们系统地检索了电子数据库中的所有文献类型(即观察性、横断面、队列、回顾性图表审查和事后分析),包括 MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL、PsycINFO 和 Web of Science,检索时间为 2013 年至 2020 年。

结果

共选择了 17 项研究的 20 个样本。MDE 和躁狂/轻躁狂发作中混合特征的合并患病率分别为 11.6%(95%置信区间 [CI] = 7.9-16.7%)和 26.8%(95% CI = 17.0-39.5%)。东亚国家重度抑郁症中混合特征的患病率最低,范围为 0-2.2%。亚组分析未发现任何有显著影响的混杂因素。大多数研究的个体都存在中度到高度偏倚风险。

结论

尽管 DSM-5 定义的混合特征越来越受到关注和争议,但很少有研究系统地估计其流行率。未来应进行具有适当设计和样本量的研究,以测量 MDE 和躁狂/轻躁狂发作期间混合特征的患病率。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验