The Kite Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 2A2, Canada.
Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3G9, Canada.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 6;18(2):405. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020405.
The use of slip-resistant winter footwear is crucial for the prevention of slips and falls on ice and snow. The main objective of this paper is to evaluate a mechanical testing method to determine footwear slip resistance on wet and dry ice surfaces and to compare it with the human-centred test method introduced by researchers at KITE (Knowledge, Innovation, Talent, Everywhere)-Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network. Phase 1 of this study assessed the repeatability and reproducibility of the mechanical method by evaluating ten different occupational winter boots using two SATRA Slip resistance testers (STM 603, SATRA Technology Centre, Kettering, UK). One tester is located in Toronto and one in Montreal. These boots were chosen based on the needs of the IRSST (Institut de Recherche Robert-Sauvé en Santé et en Sécurité du Travail, Montréal, Quebec, Canada), who were primarily interested in providing safe winter footwear for police, firefighters and municipal workers. In Phase 2, the results of the human-centred test approach were compared with the mechanical results. In Phase 3, two of these boots with conflicting results from the previous phases were tested using a second human-centred method. In Phase 1, the mechanical testing results obtained in the two labs showed a high linear correlation (>0.94) and good agreement on both ice surfaces; however, they revealed a bias (~0.06) between the two labs on the dry ice condition. The mechanical and human-centred tests (phase 2) were found to be better correlated in the wet ice condition (R = 0.95) compared to the dry ice condition (R = 0.34). Finally, the rating of the footwear slip resistance based on the number of slips counted in phase 3 was consistent with the rating by the human-centred test method (phase 2), but not the mechanical method (phase 1). The findings of this study provide a better understanding of the limitations of the SATRA ice tray for measuring footwear slip resistance and demonstrate that the mechanical method must be further refined to make it more comparable to the human-centred methods to achieve better agreement with real-world performance.
在冰面和雪地上,使用具有防滑功能的冬季鞋类对于防止滑倒和摔倒至关重要。本文的主要目的是评估一种机械测试方法,以确定湿冰和干冰表面上鞋类的防滑阻力,并将其与 KITE(Knowledge,Innovation,Talent,Everywhere)-多伦多康复研究所-大学健康网络研究人员引入的以人为中心的测试方法进行比较。该研究的第一阶段通过使用两个 SATRA 防滑测试仪(STM 603,SATRA Technology Centre,Kettering,UK)评估十种不同的职业冬季靴,评估了机械方法的可重复性和再现性。一个测试在多伦多,一个在蒙特利尔。这些靴子是根据 IRSST(Institut de Recherche Robert-Sauvé en Santé et en Sécurité du Travail,Montréal,Quebec,Canada)的需求选择的,IRSST 主要有兴趣为警察、消防员和市政工人提供安全的冬季鞋类。在第二阶段,将以人为中心的测试方法的结果与机械结果进行了比较。在第三阶段,使用第二种以人为中心的方法对前两个阶段结果有冲突的两种靴子进行了测试。在第一阶段,两个实验室获得的机械测试结果显示出高线性相关性(>0.94),并且在两种冰面上都具有良好的一致性;但是,它们在干冰条件下显示出两个实验室之间的偏差(~0.06)。在湿冰条件下(R = 0.95),机械和以人为中心的测试(第二阶段)比在干冰条件下(R = 0.34)相关性更好。最后,根据第三阶段中记录的滑倒次数对鞋类防滑阻力的评级与以人为中心的测试方法(第二阶段)的评级一致,但与机械方法(第一阶段)不一致。这项研究的结果提供了对 SATRA 冰盘测量鞋类防滑阻力的局限性的更好理解,并表明必须进一步改进机械方法,使其更能与人以中心的方法相媲美,以实现与实际性能更好的一致性。