• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改善 Kings County Hospital Center 创伤患者的 SCD 依从性:质量改进报告。

Improving SCD compliance in trauma patients at Kings County Hospital Center: a quality improvement report.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, New York, USA.

Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open Qual. 2021 Jan;10(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001171.

DOI:10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001171
PMID:33419735
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7798780/
Abstract

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is the fourth most commonly reported complication in trauma patients. For these patients, thromboprophylaxis is a standard of care. Patient compliance with sequential compression devices (SCDs), a form of mechanical VTE prophylaxis, has been a focus of efforts to improve patient safety. At our institution, a baseline audit in July 2020 revealed that patients admitted to the trauma floors have poor compliance with the use of SCDs. In this quality improvement project, we developed a patient education intervention to improve SCD compliance. We distributed an informational flyer to patients and led short educational sessions on VTE risk factors and proper SCD use. Our aim was to increase our SCD compliance rate by 30% in 4 weeks. We used three plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles to implement and refine our intervention. We measured SCD compliance during morning and afternoon patient observations and generated run charts to understand how our cycles were leading to change. After a 4-week period, we did not achieve our aim, but increased our overall compliance from 45% to 60% and sustained this improvement throughout our PDSA cycles. Morning compliance was lower than afternoon compliance both at baseline (45% vs 48.5%) and at the end the project (45% vs 53%). Our results suggest that patient education should be coupled with interventions that address other barriers to SCD compliance.

摘要

静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)是创伤患者中第四种最常见的报告并发症。对于这些患者,血栓预防是一种标准的护理。患者对连续压迫装置(SCD)的依从性,一种机械性 VTE 预防措施,一直是提高患者安全性的重点。在我们的机构中,2020 年 7 月的基线审核显示,入住创伤病房的患者对 SCD 的使用依从性很差。在这个质量改进项目中,我们开发了一种患者教育干预措施,以提高 SCD 的依从性。我们向患者发放了宣传传单,并就 VTE 风险因素和正确使用 SCD 进行了简短的教育课程。我们的目标是在 4 周内将我们的 SCD 依从率提高 30%。我们使用了三个计划-执行-研究-行动(PDSA)循环来实施和完善我们的干预措施。我们在早晨和下午的患者观察期间测量 SCD 的依从性,并生成运行图,以了解我们的循环如何带来变化。经过 4 周的时间,我们没有达到我们的目标,但将我们的整体依从率从 45%提高到 60%,并在整个 PDSA 循环中保持了这一提高。在基线时(45%比 48.5%)和项目结束时(45%比 53%),早晨的依从性都低于下午的依从性。我们的结果表明,患者教育应与解决 SCD 依从性其他障碍的干预措施相结合。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ec3/7798780/6061012dda97/bmjoq-2020-001171f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ec3/7798780/7540e6737533/bmjoq-2020-001171f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ec3/7798780/6061012dda97/bmjoq-2020-001171f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ec3/7798780/7540e6737533/bmjoq-2020-001171f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ec3/7798780/6061012dda97/bmjoq-2020-001171f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Improving SCD compliance in trauma patients at Kings County Hospital Center: a quality improvement report.改善 Kings County Hospital Center 创伤患者的 SCD 依从性:质量改进报告。
BMJ Open Qual. 2021 Jan;10(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001171.
2
Sequential Compression Device Compliance for Venous Thromboembolism in High-Risk Trauma: A Quality Improvement Study.高危创伤患者静脉血栓栓塞症序贯压迫装置依从性:一项质量改进研究。
J Trauma Nurs. 2024;31(1):34-39. doi: 10.1097/JTN.0000000000000768.
3
Sequential compression device compliance in pregnant women requiring antepartum admission.产前住院孕妇序贯加压装置依从性。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021 Apr;34(7):1063-1069. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1623873. Epub 2019 Jun 4.
4
Timely Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Trauma: A Team Approach to Process Improvement.创伤及时预防静脉血栓栓塞症:团队方法改善流程。
J Trauma Nurs. 2020 May/Jun;27(3):185-189. doi: 10.1097/JTN.0000000000000509.
5
Increasing venous thromboembolism risk assessment through a whole hospital-based intervention: a pre-post service evaluation to demonstrate quality improvement.通过全院范围内的干预措施提高静脉血栓栓塞风险评估水平:一项前后对照的服务评估以证明质量改进。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2024 Mar 11;36(1). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzae019.
6
Multidisciplinary, patient-centred approach to improving compliance with venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in a district general hospital.多学科、以患者为中心的方法,提高一家地区综合医院静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)预防的依从性。
BMJ Open Qual. 2020 Jul;9(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000680.
7
Compliance with mechanical venous thromboproembolism prophylaxis after cesarean delivery.剖宫产术后机械性静脉血栓栓塞预防措施的依从性。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016 Oct;29(19):3072-5. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2015.1118453. Epub 2015 Dec 4.
8
Surgeon-led improvement in compliance with use of sequential compression devices in a neurosurgery patient population.外科医生主导的改进可提高神经外科患者人群中使用序贯压迫装置的依从性。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Aug 5;13(3):e002807. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002807.
9
What Factors Influence Compliance With Sequential Compression Devices in an Orthopaedic Unit: A Quality Assurance Observational Study.
J Surg Orthop Adv. 2018 Winter;27(4):307-311.
10
Sequential compression devices in postoperative urologic patients: an observational trial and survey study on the influence of patient and hospital factors on compliance.术后泌尿科患者使用序贯压迫装置:一项关于患者和医院因素对依从性影响的观察性试验和调查研究。
BMC Urol. 2013 Apr 11;13:20. doi: 10.1186/1471-2490-13-20.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the Quality of Use of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Prophylactic Devices for Stroke Patients at Leeds General Infirmary: An Audit and Re-audit.评估利兹总医院中风患者静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)预防装置的使用质量:一次审计与重新审计
Cureus. 2024 Dec 13;16(12):e75636. doi: 10.7759/cureus.75636. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Surgeon-led improvement in compliance with use of sequential compression devices in a neurosurgery patient population.外科医生主导的改进可提高神经外科患者人群中使用序贯压迫装置的依从性。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Aug 5;13(3):e002807. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002807.

本文引用的文献

1
Systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes in patients with suspected deep vein thrombosis.疑似深静脉血栓形成患者结局的系统评价与荟萃分析
Blood Adv. 2020 Jun 23;4(12):2779-2788. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020001558.
2
Association of the Risk of a Venous Thromboembolic Event in Emergency vs Elective General Surgery.急诊与择期普通外科手术静脉血栓栓塞事件风险的关联。
JAMA Surg. 2020 Jun 1;155(6):503-511. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0433.
3
What Factors Influence Compliance With Sequential Compression Devices in an Orthopaedic Unit: A Quality Assurance Observational Study.
J Surg Orthop Adv. 2018 Winter;27(4):307-311.
4
A pilot study of venous flow augmentation using a novel mechanical graded intermittent sequential compression device for venous insufficiency.使用新型机械分级间歇序贯压缩装置治疗静脉功能不全的静脉血流增强的初步研究。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2019 Mar;7(2):217-221. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2018.10.018. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
5
A Process Improvement Evaluation of Sequential Compression Device Compliance and Effects of Provider Intervention.序贯加压装置依从性及医护人员干预效果的过程改进评估
J Surg Orthop Adv. 2017 Summer;26(2):94-97.
6
Effect of Compression Devices on Preventing Deep Vein Thrombosis Among Adult Trauma Patients: A Systematic Review.加压装置对成年创伤患者预防深静脉血栓形成的影响:一项系统评价
Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2015 Sep-Oct;34(5):289-300. doi: 10.1097/DCC.0000000000000127.
7
Implementing evidence-based practice using an interprofessional team approach: part two.
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2014 Sep;41(5):548-50. doi: 10.1188/14.ONF.548-550.
8
The 'procoagulopathy' of trauma: too much, too late?创伤的“促凝障碍”:太多,太迟?
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2013 Dec;19(6):578-86. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000032.
9
Sequential compression devices in postoperative urologic patients: an observational trial and survey study on the influence of patient and hospital factors on compliance.术后泌尿科患者使用序贯压迫装置:一项关于患者和医院因素对依从性影响的观察性试验和调查研究。
BMC Urol. 2013 Apr 11;13:20. doi: 10.1186/1471-2490-13-20.
10
Promoting a culture of safety as a patient safety strategy: a systematic review.促进安全文化作为患者安全策略:系统评价。
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Mar 5;158(5 Pt 2):369-74. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-5-201303051-00002.