Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in the Early Prevention of Obesity in Childhood, Sydney, Australia.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Jan 9;18(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-01074-8.
BACKGROUND: Increasingly, public health interventions are delivered via telephone and/or text messages. Recent systematic reviews of early childhood obesity prevention interventions have not adequately reported on the way interventions are delivered and the experiences/perceptions of stakeholders. We aimed to summarise the literature in early childhood obesity prevention interventions delivered via telephone or text messages for evidence of application of process evaluation primarily to evaluate stakeholders' acceptability of interventions. METHODS: A systematic search of major electronic databases was carried out using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes framework. Studies were included if interventions were delivered via telephone/text messages; aimed at changing caregivers' behaviours to prevent early childhood obesity; with one or more outcomes related to early obesity risk factors such as breastfeeding, solid feeding, tummy time, sleep and settling, physical activity and screen time; published from inception to May 2020. All eligible studies were independently assessed by two reviewers using the Cochrane Collaboration tool for assessing risk of bias. Qualitative studies were assessed using the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research and Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research tools. RESULTS: Twenty-four studies were eligible, and the overall risk of bias was low. Eight studies (33%) had evidence of process evaluation that examined participants' perceptions of interventions. Participants appreciated the convenience of receiving interventions via telephone or text messages. 63% of all studies in this review showed improvement in one or more behaviours related to childhood obesity prevention. Participants were likely to modify behaviours if they received information from a credible source such as from health professionals. CONCLUSION: There is limited reporting of stakeholders' experiences in early obesity prevention studies delivered by telephone or text messages. Only one-third of studies examined participants' acceptability and the potential for delivery of childhood obesity prevention interventions conveniently using this mode of delivery. Interventions delivered remotely via telephone or text messages have the potential to reach equal or a greater number of participants than those delivered via face-to-face methods. Future research should build in process evaluation alongside effectiveness measurements to provide important insight into intervention reach, acceptability and to inform scale up. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration: CRD42019108658.
背景:越来越多的公共卫生干预措施通过电话和/或短信进行。最近对儿童期肥胖预防干预措施的系统评价并未充分报告干预措施的实施方式以及利益相关者的经验/看法。我们旨在总结通过电话或短信进行的儿童期肥胖预防干预措施的文献,主要是为了评估利益相关者对干预措施的可接受性,以提供应用过程评估的证据。
方法:使用人群、干预、比较、结果框架对主要电子数据库进行了系统搜索。如果干预措施通过电话/短信进行;旨在改变照顾者的行为以预防儿童期肥胖;有一个或多个与母乳喂养、固体喂养、腹部时间、睡眠和安定、身体活动和屏幕时间等早期肥胖风险因素相关的结果;从成立到 2020 年 5 月发表,则研究符合纳入标准。所有符合条件的研究均由两位审查员使用 Cochrane 协作组评估偏倚风险工具进行独立评估。定性研究使用综合定性研究报告标准和定性研究报告标准进行评估。
结果:有 24 项研究符合条件,整体偏倚风险较低。8 项研究(33%)有证据表明进行了过程评估,以检查参与者对干预措施的看法。参与者赞赏通过电话或短信接受干预的便利性。本综述中 63%的研究显示出与儿童期肥胖预防相关的一种或多种行为的改善。如果参与者从可信来源(如卫生专业人员)获得信息,则更有可能改变行为。
结论:通过电话或短信进行的早期肥胖预防研究很少报告利益相关者的经验。只有三分之一的研究检查了参与者的可接受性,以及通过这种模式方便地提供儿童期肥胖预防干预措施的潜力。通过电话或短信远程提供的干预措施有可能比面对面方法覆盖更多或同等数量的参与者。未来的研究应在有效性测量的基础上纳入过程评估,为干预措施的覆盖面、可接受性提供重要的见解,并为扩大规模提供信息。
试验注册:PROSPERO 注册:CRD42019108658。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021-1-9
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-2-1
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019-10-23
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019-8-13
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-6-22
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022-12-27
Matern Child Nutr. 2022-5
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020-5-26
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020-4-8
Healthcare (Basel). 2020-3-16
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019-8-13