文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期，新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.

作者信息

Sterne Jonathan A C, Savović Jelena, Page Matthew J, Elbers Roy G, Blencowe Natalie S, Boutron Isabelle, Cates Christopher J, Cheng Hung-Yuan, Corbett Mark S, Eldridge Sandra M, Emberson Jonathan R, Hernán Miguel A, Hopewell Sally, Hróbjartsson Asbjørn, Junqueira Daniela R, Jüni Peter, Kirkham Jamie J, Lasserson Toby, Li Tianjing, McAleenan Alexandra, Reeves Barnaby C, Shepperd Sasha, Shrier Ian, Stewart Lesley A, Tilling Kate, White Ian R, Whiting Penny F, Higgins Julian P T

机构信息

Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2BN, UK

NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, Bristol, UK.

出版信息

BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.l4898
PMID:31462531
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

[1]
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.

BMJ. 2019-8-28

[2]
The revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) showed low interrater reliability and challenges in its application.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2020-10

[3]
Practicalities of using a modified version of the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool for randomised and non-randomised study designs applied in a health technology assessment setting.

Res Synth Methods. 2013-11-14

[4]
Research Quality of Clinical Trials Reported for Foods with Function Claims in Japan, 2023-2024: Evaluation Based on a Revised Tool to Assess Risk of Bias in Randomized Trials.

Nutrients. 2024-8-17

[5]
Risk of bias judgments for random sequence generation in Cochrane systematic reviews were frequently not in line with Cochrane Handbook.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019-8-5

[6]
Common challenges and suggestions for risk of bias tool development: a systematic review of methodological studies.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2024-7

[7]
Frequency of use and adequacy of Cochrane risk of bias tool 2 in non-Cochrane systematic reviews published in 2020: Meta-research study.

Res Synth Methods. 2024-5

[8]
SYRCLE's risk of bias tool for animal studies.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014-3-26

[9]
Using Risk of Bias 2 to assess results from randomised controlled trials: guidance from Cochrane.

BMJ Evid Based Med. 2023-8

[10]
Adequacy of risk of bias assessment in surgical vs non-surgical trials in Cochrane reviews: a methodological study.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020-9-29

引用本文的文献

[1]
The role of remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) in colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized-controlled studies.

Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025-9-8

[2]
Intraoperative and Postoperative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2025-9-5

[3]
Approaches for the treatment of perforated peptic ulcers: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025-9-5

[4]
A systematic review of health promoting effects of consumption of whey-based fermented products on adults.

Front Nutr. 2025-8-20

[5]
Effect of Preoperative Budesonide on Postoperative Sore Throat: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Hosp Pharm. 2025-9-1

[6]
Exploring the Relationship Between Gut Health and Autoimmune Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Cureus. 2025-8-3

[7]
Impact of Urate-Lowering Agents on Renal Outcomes in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review.

Cureus. 2025-8-4

[8]
Human Versus Artificial Intelligence: Comparing Cochrane Authors' and ChatGPT's Risk of Bias Assessments.

Cochrane Evid Synth Methods. 2025-8-31

[9]
Consumption of sorghum-based products and their impact on blood glucose and satiety in adult patients: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

PLoS One. 2025-9-4

[10]
Methodological Standards for Conducting High-Quality Systematic Reviews.

Biology (Basel). 2025-8-1

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索