Ermers Daisy Jm, Kuip Evelien Jm, Veldhoven Cmm, Schers Henk J, Perry Marieke, Bronkhorst Ewald M, Vissers Kris Cp, Engels Yvonne
Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Palliat Med. 2021 Mar;35(3):592-602. doi: 10.1177/0269216320986720. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
The Surprise Question (" ) is widely used to identify palliative patients, though with low predictive value. To improve timely identification of palliative care needs, we propose an additional Surprise Question (" ) if the original Surprise Question is answered with "no." The combination of the two questions is called the Double Surprise Question.
To examine the prognostic accuracy of the Double Surprise Question in outpatients with cancer.
A prospective study.
Twelve medical oncologists completed the Double Surprise Question for 379 patients.
In group 1 (original Surprise Question "yes": surprised if dead) 92.1% (176/191) of the patients were still alive after 1 year, in group 2a (original and additional Surprise Question "no": not surprised if dead and not surprised if alive) 60.0% (63/105), and in group 2b (original Surprise Question "no," additional Surprise Question "yes": surprised if alive) 26.5% (22/83) ( < 0.0001). The positive predictive value increased by using the Double Surprise Question; 74% (61/83) vs 55% (103/188). Anticipatory palliative care provision and Advance Care Planning items were most often documented in group 2b.
The Double Surprise Question is a promising tool to more accurately identify outpatients with cancer at risk of dying within 1 year, and therefore, those in need of palliative care. Studies should reveal whether the implementation of the Double Surprise Question leads to more timely palliative care.
“意外问题”被广泛用于识别姑息治疗患者,但其预测价值较低。为了提高对姑息治疗需求的及时识别,我们建议如果最初的“意外问题”回答为“否”,则增加一个补充“意外问题”。这两个问题的组合称为“双重意外问题”。
检验“双重意外问题”对癌症门诊患者的预后准确性。
一项前瞻性研究。
12名肿瘤内科医生对379例患者进行了“双重意外问题”调查。
第1组(最初的“意外问题”回答为“是”:如果死亡会感到意外)中,92.1%(176/191)的患者1年后仍存活;第2a组(最初和补充的“意外问题”回答均为“否”:如果死亡不感到意外且如果存活也不感到意外)中,60.0%(63/105)的患者存活;第2b组(最初的“意外问题”回答为“否”,补充的“意外问题”回答为“是”:如果存活会感到意外)中,26.5%(22/83)的患者存活(<0.0001)。使用“双重意外问题”后阳性预测值有所提高;分别为74%(61/83)和55%(103/188)。预先姑息治疗和预立医疗计划项目在第2b组中记录得最为频繁。
“双重意外问题”是一种很有前景的工具,可更准确地识别有在1年内死亡风险的癌症门诊患者,从而识别出需要姑息治疗的患者。研究应揭示“双重意外问题”的实施是否能带来更及时的姑息治疗。