Naga Hani I, Mellia Joseph A, Diatta Fortunay, Othman Sammy, Patel Viren, Janis Jeffrey E, Heniford B Todd, Fischer John P
Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa.
Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Dec 16;8(12):e3309. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003309. eCollection 2020 Dec.
The prevalence of complex abdominal wall defects continues to rise, which necessitates increasingly sophisticated medical and surgical management. Insurance coverage for reconstructive surgery varies due to differing interpretations of medical necessity. The authors sought to characterize the current insurance landscape for a subset of key adjunctive procedures in abdominal wall reconstruction, including component separation and simultaneous ventral hernia repair with panniculectomy (SVHR-P) or abdominoplasty (SVHR-A), and synthesize a set of reporting recommendations based on insurer criteria.
Insurance companies were selected based on their national and state market share. Preauthorization criteria, preauthorization lists, and medical/clinical policies by each company for component separation, SVRH-P, and SVRH-A were examined. Coverage criteria were abstracted and analyzed.
Fifty insurance companies were included in the study. Only 1 company had clear approval criteria for component separation, while 38 cover it on a case-by-case basis. Four companies had clear approval policies for SVHR-P, 4 cover them on an individual case basis, and 28 flatly do not cover SVHR-P. Similarly, 3 companies had clear approval policies for SVHR-A, 6 cover them case by case, and 33 do not cover SVHR-A.
Component separation and soft tissue contouring are important adjunctive AWR procedures with efficacy supported by peer-reviewed literature. The variability in SVHR-P and SVHR-A coverage likely decreases access to these procedures even when there are established medical indications. The authors recommend standardization of coverage criteria for component separation, given that differing interpretations of medical necessity increase the likelihood of insurance denials.
复杂腹壁缺损的患病率持续上升,这就需要越来越复杂的医学和外科治疗。由于对医疗必要性的不同解释,重建手术的保险覆盖范围各不相同。作者试图描述腹壁重建中一组关键辅助手术的当前保险情况,包括成分分离、同时进行腹疝修补术与脂肪切除术(SVHR-P)或腹壁成形术(SVHR-A),并根据保险公司的标准综合制定一套报告建议。
根据保险公司的全国和州市场份额进行选择。检查了各公司对成分分离、SVHR-P和SVHR-A的预授权标准、预授权清单以及医疗/临床政策。提取并分析了覆盖标准。
该研究纳入了50家保险公司。只有1家公司对成分分离有明确的批准标准,而38家是逐案处理。4家公司对SVHR-P有明确的批准政策,4家逐案处理,28家完全不覆盖SVHR-P。同样,3家公司对SVHR-A有明确的批准政策,6家逐案处理,33家不覆盖SVHR-A。
成分分离和软组织塑形是重要的辅助腹壁重建手术,其疗效得到了同行评审文献的支持。即使有既定的医学指征,SVHR-P和SVHR-A覆盖范围的差异可能会减少获得这些手术的机会。鉴于对医疗必要性的不同解释增加了保险拒赔的可能性,作者建议对成分分离的覆盖标准进行标准化。