Cheng Jun, He Jun, Wang Shanshan, Zhao Zhangxiang, Yan Haidan, Guan Qingzhou, Li Jing, Guo Zheng, Ao Lu
Department of Bioinformatics, Fujian Key Laboratory of Medical Bioinformatics, Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Gastrointestinal Cancer, The School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Department of Systems Biology, College of Bioinformatics Science and Technology, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Front Mol Biosci. 2020 Dec 23;7:533196. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2020.533196. eCollection 2020.
The non-cancerous components in tumor tissues, e.g., infiltrating stromal cells and immune cells, dilute tumor purity and might confound genomic mutation profile analyses and the identification of pathological biomarkers. It is necessary to systematically evaluate the influence of tumor purity. Here, using public gastric cancer samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), we firstly showed that numbers of mutation, separately called by four algorithms, were significant positively correlated with tumor purities (all < 0.05, Spearman rank correlation). Similar results were also observed in other nine cancers from TCGA. Notably, the result was further confirmed by six in-house samples from two gastric cancer patients and five in-house samples from two colorectal cancer patients with different tumor purities. Furthermore, the metastasis mechanism of gastric cancer may be incorrectly characterized as numbers of mutation and tumor purities of 248 lymph node metastatic (N + M0) samples were both significantly lower than those of 121 non-metastatic (N0M0) samples ( < 0.05, Wilcoxon rank-sum test). Similar phenomena were also observed that tumor purities could confound the analysis of histological subtypes of cancer and the identification of microsatellite instability status (MSI) in both gastric and colon cancer. Finally, we suggested that the higher tumor purity, such as above 70%, rather than 60%, could be better to meet the requirement of mutation calling. In conclusion, the influence of tumor purity on the genomic mutation profile and pathological analyses should be fully considered in the further study.
肿瘤组织中的非癌成分,如浸润的基质细胞和免疫细胞,会稀释肿瘤纯度,可能会混淆基因组突变谱分析以及病理生物标志物的鉴定。有必要系统地评估肿瘤纯度的影响。在此,我们使用来自癌症基因组图谱(TCGA)的公开胃癌样本,首先表明,由四种算法分别调用的突变数量与肿瘤纯度呈显著正相关(所有P<0.05,Spearman等级相关性)。在TCGA的其他九种癌症中也观察到了类似结果。值得注意的是,来自两名胃癌患者的六个内部样本以及来自两名具有不同肿瘤纯度的结直肠癌患者的五个内部样本进一步证实了这一结果。此外,胃癌的转移机制可能被错误表征,因为248个淋巴结转移(N+M0)样本的突变数量和肿瘤纯度均显著低于121个非转移(N0M0)样本(P<0.05,Wilcoxon秩和检验)。在胃癌和结肠癌中也观察到类似现象,即肿瘤纯度会混淆癌症组织学亚型的分析以及微卫星不稳定性状态(MSI)的鉴定。最后,我们建议,较高的肿瘤纯度,如高于70%,而非60%,可能更能满足突变检测的要求。总之,在进一步研究中应充分考虑肿瘤纯度对基因组突变谱和病理分析的影响。