Bansal Alka, Jain Smita, Sharma Lokendra, Sharma Neha, Jain Charu, Madaan Moksh
Department of Pharmacology, SMS Medical College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Department of Mathematics, JECRC University, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
J Educ Health Promot. 2020 Nov 26;9:301. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_221_20. eCollection 2020.
Medical education is tricky to imbibe and difficult to apply. Various teaching-learning (TL) methods have been tried from time to time to enhance the proficiency of students. The aim was to assess the students' perception toward three different TL methods (pedagogy, andragogy, and heutagogy) in medical education.
A comparative experimentalquestionnaire-based study was done on population of second-year MBBS students of SMS Medical College, Jaipur, in October 2019. They were taught topic of anticancer drugs using pedagogy, andragogy, and heutagogy methods. Then, their opinion regarding these methods was collected and evaluated. The reliability of the questionnaire was ascertained by Cronbach's alpha value which turned out to be 0.89. The data collected were analyzed statistically using one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Principal Component Analysis (PCA).
The results showed that all these methods differ significantly from each other as the < 0.05 considering 5% as level of significance. PCA revealed that andragogy and heutagogy were found to be most effective in this study.
Competency-based andragogy and capability-based heutagogy are more effective TL methods than didactic lecture-based pedagogy for MBBS undergraduate students.
医学教育难以吸收且难以应用。为提高学生的专业水平,人们不时尝试各种教学方法。目的是评估学生对医学教育中三种不同教学方法(教学法、成人教学法和 heutagogy)的看法。
2019 年 10 月,对斋浦尔 SMS 医学院二年级 MBBS 学生群体进行了一项基于比较实验问卷的研究。使用教学法、成人教学法和 heutagogy 方法向他们讲授抗癌药物的主题。然后,收集并评估他们对这些方法的看法。问卷的信度通过克朗巴哈系数确定,结果为 0.89。使用单向方差分析(ANOVA)和主成分分析(PCA)对收集到的数据进行统计分析。
结果表明,考虑到 5%的显著性水平,所有这些方法彼此之间存在显著差异,<0.05。主成分分析表明,在本研究中成人教学法和 heutagogy 被发现是最有效的。
对于 MBBS 本科学生,基于能力的成人教学法和基于能力的 heutagogy 比基于说教式讲座的教学法更有效的教学方法。