Araghizadeh Hassan, Peyravi Mahmoudreza, Sharififar Simintaj, Ahmadi Marzaleh Milad
Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Baghiyyatollah al-Azam Hospital, Baqiyatallah University of Medical sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Health in Disasters and Emergencies, Health Human Resources Research Center, School of Management and Medical Informatics, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Bull Emerg Trauma. 2020 Oct;8(4):218-223. doi: 10.30476/beat.2020.83646.
The present study aimed at codifying a native model of civil-military coordination (CIMIC) in natural disasters in Iran.
This manuscript is a part of a larger study. The present cross-sectional study was conducted in 2019 using a two-stage Delphi technique. The factors confirmed by the technique were prioritized via a pairwise questionnaire. In doing so, 24 elites and experts in civil-military coordination were presented with the indicators in the course of classic Delphi technique and pairwise comparison. At the end, the nationalized model was finalized by sending the model to ten experts and asking their ideas.
The results obtained from the two rounds of Delphi indicated that 36 coordination factors could be classified into three primary classes of staff, stuff, and system. All factors were confirmed by the experts. Considering the weight of each class, "staff" and "stuff" classes were considered to be the highest and lowest priorities, respectively.
Application of the coordination factors in the context of military and civil organizations leads to a better response to natural disasters. The organizations in charge of responding to disasters should be obliged to apply this model in the highest organizational commitment level as the final goals of disaster management. The results of the present study can be applied for codification of a comprehensive plan for assessing the civil-military coordination in natural disasters.
本研究旨在编纂伊朗自然灾害中军民协调（CIMIC）的本土模式。
本手稿是一项更大规模研究的一部分。本横断面研究于2019年采用两阶段德尔菲技术进行。通过成对问卷对该技术确认的因素进行优先级排序。在此过程中，24位军民协调领域的精英和专家在经典德尔菲技术和成对比较过程中了解了各项指标。最后，通过将该模式发送给十位专家并询问他们的意见，确定了本土化模式。
两轮德尔菲法得出的结果表明，36个协调因素可分为人员、物资和系统三个主要类别。所有因素均得到专家确认。考虑到每个类别的权重，“人员”和“物资”类别分别被视为最高和最低优先级。
在军事和民间组织背景下应用协调因素可更好地应对自然灾害。负责应对灾害的组织应在最高组织承诺水平上应用该模式，作为灾害管理的最终目标。本研究结果可用于编纂评估自然灾害中军民协调的综合计划。
