Chaumont Corentin, Bourilhon Julie, Chastan Nathalie, Mirolo Adrian, Eltchaninoff Hélène, Anselme Frédéric
Department of Cardiology, Rouen University Hospital, CHU de Rouen, 1 rue de Germont, 76031 Rouen, France.
Department of Neurology, Rouen University Hospital, CHU de Rouen, 1 rue de Germont, 76031 Rouen, France.
Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2020 Sep 19;4(5):1-6. doi: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytaa236. eCollection 2020 Oct.
While transient loss of consciousness is a frequent presenting symptom, differential diagnosis between syncope and epilepsy can be challenging. Misdiagnosis of epilepsy leads to important psychosocial consequences and eliminates the opportunity to treat patient's true condition.
A 39-year-old woman presenting with recurrent seizures since her childhood was referred to neurological consultation. Electroencephalograms (EEGs) and magnetic resonance imaging previously performed were normal. A sleep-deprived video-EEG was performed and highlighted after 12 h of sleep deprivation a progressive dropping of the heart rate followed by a complete heart block without ventricular escape rhythm and asystole for about 30 s. Her EEG recording later showed diffuse slow waves traducing a global cerebral dysfunction and suffering. The diagnosis of vaso-vagal syncope with predominant cardioinhibitory response was made and a dual-chamber pacemaker with rate-drop response algorithm was implanted. After a 2 years of follow-up, the patient remained free of syncope.
Patients presenting with loss of consciousness and convulsion are often diagnosed with epilepsy despite normal EEGs. In patients presenting with recurrent seizures with unclear diagnosis of epilepsy or in a situation of drug-resistant epilepsy, syncope diagnosis should always be considered and a risk stratification is necessary. The benefit of pacemaker implantation in patients with recurrent vaso-vagal syncope is still very controversial. Only patients presenting with spontaneous asystole should be considered for pacemaker implantation in case of recurrent vaso-vagal syncope.
虽然短暂性意识丧失是常见的就诊症状,但晕厥与癫痫的鉴别诊断可能具有挑战性。癫痫的误诊会导致重要的心理社会后果,并消除治疗患者真实病情的机会。
一名39岁女性自幼反复出现癫痫发作,前来进行神经科会诊。此前进行的脑电图(EEG)和磁共振成像均正常。进行了睡眠剥夺视频脑电图检查,在睡眠剥夺12小时后发现心率逐渐下降,随后出现完全性心脏传导阻滞,无室性逸搏心律,心脏停搏约30秒。她的脑电图记录随后显示弥漫性慢波,提示全脑功能障碍和痛苦。诊断为以心脏抑制反应为主的血管迷走性晕厥,并植入了具有心率下降反应算法的双腔起搏器。经过2年的随访,患者未再发生晕厥。
尽管脑电图正常,但出现意识丧失和抽搐的患者常被诊断为癫痫。对于诊断不明的反复癫痫发作患者或耐药性癫痫患者,应始终考虑晕厥诊断,并进行风险分层。反复血管迷走性晕厥患者植入起搏器的益处仍存在很大争议。对于反复血管迷走性晕厥患者,仅出现自发性心脏停搏的患者才应考虑植入起搏器。