Emergency versus elective ureteroscopy for the management of ureteral stones.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the safety and efficacy of emergency ureteroscopy (URS) compared with elective URS.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent URS for isolated ureteral stones in a single center from October 2001 to February 2014. Our patient cohort was divided into two groups: an emergency URS group (Group A), which consisted of patients who underwent URS within the first 24 h of admission, and an elective or planned URS group (Group B). The URS success rate was defined as being the incidence of successful stone fragmentation and whether there was resolution of renal obstruction.

RESULTS

A total of 2957 patients' medical records were available for analysis. Of these, 704 (21%) comprised of emergency cases and the remaining 2253 (79%) were elective cases. Patients in Group A were younger, had a smaller BMIs, and had smaller stone sizes ( < 0.001). The URS success rate was found to be 97% in Group A and 96% in Group B ( = 0.35). Intraoperative or postoperative complication rates were not found to vary significantly between the groups (8% vs 7%, respectively,  = 0.50). The incidence of ureteral stenting was nearly twice as high if URS was performed during night hours (85% vs 45%,  < 0.001). However, ureteral stenting was more prevalent in Group B compared to Group A patients (57% vs 25%,  < 0.001), possibly as a result of the number of pre-stented patients (73%).

CONCLUSIONS

Emergency URS is an effective and safe option for patients with renal colic. Younger patients without pre-existing obesity and with stone sizes up to 8 mm located in the distal ureter might be a better match for emergency URS.