Prehosp Emerg Care. 2022 Mar-Apr;26(2):179-188. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2021.1873471. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA) in schools and universities are uncommon. However, these institutions must plan and prepare for such events to ensure the best outcomes. To evaluate their preparedness we assessed baseline characteristics, survival outcomes and 12-year trends for OHCA in schools/universities compared to other public locations. We conducted a retrospective analysis of OHCA in schools/universities and public locations between 2008 and 2019 using Victorian Ambulance Cardiac Arrest Registry data. We included 9,037 EMS attended cases, 131 occurred in schools/universities and 8,906 in public locations. Compared to public locations, a significantly higher proportion of EMS treated cases in schools/universities received bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) (95.5% vs. 78.5%, p < 0.001), public access defibrillation (PAD) (26.1% vs. 9.9%, p < 0.001) and presented in shockable rhythms (69.4% vs. 50.9%, p < 0.001). Unadjusted survival to hospital discharge rates were also significantly higher in schools/universities (39.6% vs. 24.2%, p < 0.001). The long-term unadjusted trends for bystander CPR in schools/universities increased from 91.7% (2008-10) to 100% (2017-19) (p-trend = 0.025), for PAD from 4.2% (2008-10) to 47.5% (2017-19) (p-trend < 0.001) and for survival to hospital discharge from 16.7% (2008-10) to 57.5% (2017-19) (p-trend = 0.004). However, after adjustment for favorable cardiac arrest factors, such as younger age, bystander CPR and PAD, survival was similar between schools/universities and public locations. The majority of OHCA in schools and universities were witnessed and received bystander CPR, however less than half received PAD. Developing site-specific cardiac emergency response plans and providing age appropriate CPR training to primary, secondary and university students would help improve PAD rates.
院外心脏骤停(OHCA)在学校和大学中较为少见。然而,这些机构必须做好计划和准备,以确保取得最佳结果。为了评估他们的准备情况,我们评估了 OHCA 在学校/大学与其他公共场所的基线特征、生存结果和 12 年趋势。我们使用维多利亚救护车心脏骤停登记处的数据,对 2008 年至 2019 年学校/大学和公共场所发生的 OHCA 进行了回顾性分析。我们纳入了 9037 例接受过 EMS 治疗的病例,其中 131 例发生在学校/大学,8906 例发生在公共场所。与公共场所相比,学校/大学中接受过 EMS 治疗的病例中,旁观者心肺复苏(CPR)(95.5%比 78.5%,p<0.001)、公共获取除颤(PAD)(26.1%比 9.9%,p<0.001)和出现可除颤节律(69.4%比 50.9%,p<0.001)的比例显著更高。未经调整的住院出院生存率在学校/大学也显著更高(39.6%比 24.2%,p<0.001)。未经调整的学校/大学旁观者 CPR 长期趋势从 2008-10 年的 91.7%上升到 2017-19 年的 100%(p 趋势=0.025),PAD 从 2008-10 年的 4.2%上升到 2017-19 年的 47.5%(p 趋势<0.001),从 2008-10 年的 16.7%上升到 2017-19 年的 57.5%(p 趋势=0.004)。然而,在校正了有利的心脏骤停因素(如年龄较小、旁观者 CPR 和 PAD)后,学校/大学和公共场所之间的生存率相似。大多数学校/大学的 OHCA 都有目击者并接受了旁观者 CPR,但不到一半的人接受了 PAD。制定特定地点的心脏急救应急计划,并为小学生、中学生和大学生提供适当年龄的 CPR 培训,将有助于提高 PAD 率。