Williamson H A, Hector M G, LeFevre M, White R D
Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Missouri-Columbia 65212.
Fam Med. 1988 Jan-Feb;20(1):51-4.
One approach to addressing the deficit in the primary care knowledge base is to answer clinical questions using a consortium of collaborating practices. Previous reports have described networks that collect descriptive data from many practices, but there are difficulties in establishing and managing large networks. Accordingly, smaller networks may be more valuable in some settings and for some clinical questions. At the University of Missouri, we have developed a research network composed of four rural family practices and a group of study coordinators. Research topics have been chosen, study methods devised, funding obtained, and valuable data collected. Although logistical problems with any diverse network are formidable, a structured approach with careful communication can overcome these difficulties. The lessons from this experience combined with those of larger primary care networks should assist others in implementing research consortiums. Collaborative research by family physicians is practical, feasible, personally and professionally rewarding, and likely to contribute important primary care knowledge.
解决基层医疗知识库不足的一种方法是通过合作医疗机构联盟来回答临床问题。先前的报告描述了从众多医疗机构收集描述性数据的网络,但建立和管理大型网络存在困难。因此,在某些情况下以及针对某些临床问题,较小的网络可能更有价值。在密苏里大学,我们建立了一个由四个农村家庭医疗诊所和一组研究协调员组成的研究网络。已经选定了研究主题,设计了研究方法,获得了资金,并收集了有价值的数据。尽管任何多样化网络的后勤问题都很艰巨,但采用精心沟通的结构化方法可以克服这些困难。从这次经验中吸取的教训,再结合较大的基层医疗网络的经验教训,应该会帮助其他人实施研究联盟。家庭医生开展合作研究是切实可行的,在个人和职业方面都有回报,并且可能会贡献重要的基层医疗知识。