Medical Faculty, Yunnan University of Business Management.
Faculty of Nursing, Roseleigh, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Jan 8;100(1):e24278. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024278.
The pathogenic mechanism and prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) are substantially improved over the past several decades, but VAP remains frequently seen among the critical cases. The Venner-PneuX endotracheal tube system (VPXETS) has been proved to perform better than standard endotracheal tubes (SET) in the prevention of VAP in some studies. Therefore, this systematic review is aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of VPXETS in order to prevent VAP.
Electronic databases, including PubMed, WANFANG, CENTRAL, CNKI, EMBASE, and CINAHL, are used to search relevant randomized controlled trials for evaluating the therapeutic effect of VPXETS on preventing VAP from January 2011 to December 2020. To be specific, related studies are selected, data are extracted, risk of bias is assessed, and meta-analysis is conducted in succession.
The present review aims to assess the therapeutic effect of VPXETS on preventing VAP in intensive care units (ICUs). Our outcome measures include the incidence and side reaction of VAP.
The present review assesses related studies regarding the therapeutic effect of VPXETS on preventing VAP at ICUs.
Our findings in this work are to be disseminated by means of peer-reviewed publication. No ethical approval is required in our review since it uses the published data. Moreover, anonymity is guaranteed during the data analysis process.
DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/6BERJ.
在过去的几十年中,呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)的发病机制和预防有了很大的改善,但 VAP 在重症病例中仍很常见。一些研究已经证明,Venner-PneuX 气管内管系统(VPXETS)在预防 VAP 方面优于标准气管内管(SET)。因此,本系统评价旨在评估 VPXETS 预防 VAP 的有效性。
电子数据库,包括 PubMed、WANFANG、CENTRAL、CNKI、EMBASE 和 CINAHL,用于搜索评估 VPXETS 预防 VAP 的治疗效果的相关随机对照试验,时间范围为 2011 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月。具体来说,选择相关研究,提取数据,评估偏倚风险,然后进行荟萃分析。
本综述旨在评估 VPXETS 在重症监护病房(ICU)预防 VAP 的治疗效果。我们的结局指标包括 VAP 的发生率和不良反应。
本综述评估了关于 VPXETS 在 ICU 预防 VAP 的治疗效果的相关研究。
我们在这项工作中的发现将通过同行评审出版物进行传播。由于本综述使用了已发表的数据,因此不需要伦理批准。此外,在数据分析过程中保证了匿名性。
OSF 注册号:DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/6BERJ。