Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, OH.
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jan;14(1):e009407. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009407. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
The conventional method of implanting balloon-expandable SAPIEN-3 (S3) valve results in a final 70:30 or 80:20 ratio of the valve in the aorta:left ventricular outflow tract with published rates of permanent pacemaker around 10%. We sought to evaluate whether higher implantation of S3 reduces conduction abnormalities including the need for permanent pacemaker.
We included consecutive patients who underwent transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement using S3 between April 2015 and December 2018 and compared outcomes with typical valve deployment strategy to our more contemporary high deployment technique (HDT). We excluded patients with nontransfemoral access or valve-in-valve.
Among 1028 patients, HDT was performed in 406 patients (39.5%). Mean implantation depth under the noncoronary cusp was significantly smaller with HDT compared with conventional technique (1.5±1.6 versus 3.2±1.9 mm; <0.001). Successful implantation was achieved in 100% of the patients in both groups with no cases of conversion to open heart surgery, second valve implantation within the first transcatheter aortic valve replacement, or coronary occlusion during transcatheter aortic valve replacement. One patient (0.2%) had valve embolization with HDT (=0.216). Thirty-day permanent pacemaker rates were lower with HDT (5.5% versus 13.1%; <0.001), as were rates of complete heart block (3.5% versus 11.2%; <0.001) and new-onset left bundle branch block (5.3% versus 12.2%; <0.001). There were no differences in mild (16.5% versus 15.9%; =0.804), or moderate-to-severe aortic regurgitation (1% versus 2.7%; =0.081) at 1 year. HDT was associated with slightly higher 1-year mean gradients (13.1±6.2 versus 11.8±4.9 mm Hg; =0.042) and peak gradients (25±11.9 versus 22.5±9 mm Hg; =0.026). However, Doppler velocity index was similar (0.47±0.15 versus 0.48±0.13; =0.772).
Our novel technique for balloon-expandable S3 valve positioning consistently achieves higher implantation resulting in substantial reduction in conduction abnormalities and permanent pacemaker requirement after transcatheter aortic valve replacement without compromising procedural safety or valve hemodynamics. Operators should consider this as an important technique to improve patient outcomes.
传统的植入球囊扩张式 SAPIEN-3(S3)瓣膜的方法导致瓣膜在主动脉中的最终比例为 70:30 或 80:20,左心室流出道,永久性起搏器的发表率约为 10%。我们试图评估更高的 S3 植入是否会降低传导异常,包括永久性起搏器的需求。
我们纳入了 2015 年 4 月至 2018 年 12 月期间接受经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣置换术的连续患者,并比较了典型瓣膜部署策略与我们更现代的高部署技术(HDT)的结果。我们排除了非经股动脉入路或瓣中瓣的患者。
在 1028 名患者中,406 名患者(39.5%)接受了 HDT。与传统技术相比,HDT 下非冠状动脉瓣下的植入深度明显较小(1.5±1.6 毫米比 3.2±1.9 毫米;<0.001)。两组患者均 100%成功植入,无转换为开胸手术、第一次经导管主动脉瓣置换术中再次植入瓣膜或经导管主动脉瓣置换术中冠状动脉闭塞的病例。1 名患者(0.2%)发生 HDT 瓣膜栓塞(=0.216)。HDT 的 30 天永久性起搏器使用率较低(5.5%比 13.1%;<0.001),完全性心脏传导阻滞(3.5%比 11.2%;<0.001)和新发左束支传导阻滞(5.3%比 12.2%;<0.001)的发生率也较低。1 年时轻度(16.5%比 15.9%;=0.804)或中度至重度主动脉瓣反流(1%比 2.7%;=0.081)无差异。HDT 与 1 年平均梯度(13.1±6.2 毫米汞柱比 11.8±4.9 毫米汞柱;=0.042)和峰值梯度(25±11.9 毫米汞柱比 22.5±9 毫米汞柱;=0.026)略有升高。然而,多普勒速度指数相似(0.47±0.15 毫米汞柱比 0.48±0.13 毫米汞柱;=0.772)。
我们用于球囊扩张式 S3 瓣膜定位的新方法可实现更高的植入成功率,从而显著降低经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的传导异常和永久性起搏器需求,同时不影响手术安全性或瓣膜血液动力学。操作人员应考虑将其作为改善患者预后的重要技术。