Suppr超能文献

聚氨基甲酸酯与壳聚糖基聚合物鼻填塞在功能性内窥镜鼻窦手术后的应用比较:一项前瞻性随机双盲研究。

Polyurethane Versus Chitosan-Based Polymers Nasal Packs After Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Double-Blinded Study.

机构信息

Otorhinolaryngology Department, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.

出版信息

Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2021 Sep;35(5):624-630. doi: 10.1177/1945892420983645. Epub 2021 Jan 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Different packing materials are applied to the nose at the end of surgery to maintain drainage and sinus ventilation of the paranasal sinuses and avoid some complications such as bleeding, infection, crustations, adhesions in the middle meatus and lateralization of the middle turbinate.

OBJECTIVE

The study aims to compare the clinical outcomes of two absorbable packing materials, the synthetic polyurethane, and the naturally occurring Chitosan-based polymers (CBP) nasal packs, after functional endoscopic sinus surgery.

METHODS

Fifty patients with bilateral chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polypi were operated with 100 surgical cavities. At the end of the surgery, one side was randomly packed with synthetic polyurethane and the opposite side with CBP nasal pack. Measure their outcomes at week 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12 as the presence of remnants materials in the middle meatus, crustations, adhesions, bleeding, granulations, infection, and general satisfaction of patients.

RESULTS

CBP nasal pack shows a statistically significant advantage only in the first two weeks as regard remnants material, crusting and bleeding. All over the 12 weeks, there was no statistically significant difference between the two types of packs as regard granulations, adhesions and infection. In the first month, eight patients of the CBP group experienced bad smell and two patients had watery rhinorrhea as adverse reaction without a statistically significant difference. Patients were generally satisfied without a statistically significant difference between the two types of packs.

CONCLUSION

Synthetic polyurethane and Chitosan-based polymers nasal packs are safe and efficient regarding; the mucosal healing, bleeding control, and the overall satisfaction of patients. The CBP showed a higher statistically significant advantage in the first two weeks only regarding the amount of the retained material, crusting as well as bleeding. Patients packed with CBP experienced fish-like smelly odor and watery rhinorrhea but there is no statistically significant difference.

摘要

背景

在手术结束时,不同的填塞材料被应用于鼻腔,以保持鼻窦的引流和窦通气,并避免一些并发症,如出血、感染、结痂、中鼻甲粘连和中鼻甲外侧化。

目的

本研究旨在比较两种可吸收填塞材料,即合成聚氨酯和天然来源的壳聚糖基聚合物(CBP)鼻填塞物,在功能性内窥镜鼻窦手术后的临床效果。

方法

50 例双侧慢性鼻-鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉患者接受了 100 个手术腔的手术。手术结束时,一侧随机用合成聚氨酯填塞,另一侧用 CBP 鼻填塞。在第 1、2、4、8 和 12 周时测量它们的结果,包括中鼻甲内残留材料、结痂、粘连、出血、肉芽组织、感染以及患者的总体满意度。

结果

CBP 鼻填塞在头两周内仅在残留材料、结痂和出血方面表现出统计学上的显著优势。在 12 周的时间内,两种填塞物在肉芽组织、粘连和感染方面没有统计学上的显著差异。在第一个月,CBP 组的 8 例患者出现异味,2 例患者出现水样鼻涕,无统计学差异。患者总体满意度无统计学差异。

结论

合成聚氨酯和壳聚糖基聚合物鼻填塞在黏膜愈合、出血控制和患者总体满意度方面是安全有效的。CBP 在头两周内仅在残留材料、结痂和出血方面表现出更高的统计学显著优势。用 CBP 填塞的患者会出现鱼腥味和水样鼻涕,但无统计学差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验